GM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 6.32% compared to General Motors's net margin of -42.85%. General Motors's return on equity of 8.33% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -65.03%.

General Motors has a consensus price target of $55.74, signalling upside risk potential of 23.22%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.26 which suggests that it could grow by 4.41%. Given that General Motors has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe General Motors is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

General Motors has a beta of 1.361, which suggesting that the stock is 36.127% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

General Motors has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. General Motors pays 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Motors quarterly revenues are $44B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.7B. General Motors's net income of $2.8B is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$743M. Notably, General Motors's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.30x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Motors is 0.26x versus 2.78x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gentherm has a net margin of 6.32% compared to General Motors's net margin of -0.04%. General Motors's return on equity of 8.33% beat Gentherm's return on equity of 7.79%.

General Motors has a consensus price target of $55.74, signalling upside risk potential of 23.22%. On the other hand Gentherm has an analysts' consensus of $40.20 which suggests that it could grow by 54.56%. Given that Gentherm has higher upside potential than General Motors, analysts believe Gentherm is more attractive than General Motors.

General Motors has a beta of 1.361, which suggesting that the stock is 36.127% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gentherm has a beta of 1.439, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.928%.

General Motors has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Gentherm offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. General Motors pays 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Gentherm pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Motors quarterly revenues are $44B, which are larger than Gentherm quarterly revenues of $353.9M. General Motors's net income of $2.8B is higher than Gentherm's net income of -$128K. Notably, General Motors's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.30x while Gentherm's PE ratio is 16.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Motors is 0.26x versus 0.56x for Gentherm. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 6.32% compared to General Motors's net margin of 2.12%. General Motors's return on equity of 8.33% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

General Motors has a consensus price target of $55.74, signalling upside risk potential of 23.22%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $289.42 which suggests that it could grow by 2.57%. Given that General Motors has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe General Motors is more attractive than Tesla.

General Motors has a beta of 1.361, which suggesting that the stock is 36.127% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.429, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 142.869%.

General Motors has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. General Motors pays 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Motors quarterly revenues are $44B, which are larger than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. General Motors's net income of $2.8B is higher than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, General Motors's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.30x while Tesla's PE ratio is 155.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Motors is 0.26x versus 10.33x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Winnebago Industries has a net margin of 6.32% compared to General Motors's net margin of -0.07%. General Motors's return on equity of 8.33% beat Winnebago Industries's return on equity of -0.45%.

General Motors has a consensus price target of $55.74, signalling upside risk potential of 23.22%. On the other hand Winnebago Industries has an analysts' consensus of $48.92 which suggests that it could grow by 53.73%. Given that Winnebago Industries has higher upside potential than General Motors, analysts believe Winnebago Industries is more attractive than General Motors.

General Motors has a beta of 1.361, which suggesting that the stock is 36.127% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Winnebago Industries has a beta of 1.120, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.955%.

General Motors has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Winnebago Industries offers a yield of 4.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. General Motors pays 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Winnebago Industries pays out 283.08% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Winnebago Industries's is not.

General Motors quarterly revenues are $44B, which are larger than Winnebago Industries quarterly revenues of $620.2M. General Motors's net income of $2.8B is higher than Winnebago Industries's net income of -$400K. Notably, General Motors's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.30x while Winnebago Industries's PE ratio is 196.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Motors is 0.26x versus 0.34x for Winnebago Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.