GM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lucid Group has a net margin of 6.32% compared to General Motors's net margin of -155.79%. General Motors's return on equity of 8.33% beat Lucid Group's return on equity of -68.6%.

General Motors has a consensus price target of $53.77, signalling upside risk potential of 6.75%. On the other hand Lucid Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.53 which suggests that it could fall by -11%. Given that General Motors has higher upside potential than Lucid Group, analysts believe General Motors is more attractive than Lucid Group.

General Motors has a beta of 1.361, which suggesting that the stock is 36.127% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

General Motors has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. Lucid Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. General Motors pays 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Motors quarterly revenues are $44B, which are larger than Lucid Group quarterly revenues of $235M. General Motors's net income of $2.8B is higher than Lucid Group's net income of -$366.2M. Notably, General Motors's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.02x while Lucid Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Motors is 0.29x versus 8.58x for Lucid Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 6.32% compared to General Motors's net margin of -43.95%. General Motors's return on equity of 8.33% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -57.26%.

General Motors has a consensus price target of $53.77, signalling upside risk potential of 6.75%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.43 which suggests that it could fall by -8.73%. Given that General Motors has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe General Motors is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

General Motors has a beta of 1.361, which suggesting that the stock is 36.127% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

General Motors has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. General Motors pays 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Motors quarterly revenues are $44B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.2B. General Motors's net income of $2.8B is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$545M. Notably, General Motors's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.02x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Motors is 0.29x versus 3.32x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 6.32% compared to General Motors's net margin of 2.12%. General Motors's return on equity of 8.33% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

General Motors has a consensus price target of $53.77, signalling upside risk potential of 6.75%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $290.36 which suggests that it could fall by -16.59%. Given that General Motors has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe General Motors is more attractive than Tesla.

General Motors has a beta of 1.361, which suggesting that the stock is 36.127% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.429, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 142.869%.

General Motors has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. General Motors pays 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Motors quarterly revenues are $44B, which are larger than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. General Motors's net income of $2.8B is higher than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, General Motors's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.02x while Tesla's PE ratio is 192.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Motors is 0.29x versus 12.82x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Winnebago Industries has a net margin of 6.32% compared to General Motors's net margin of -0.07%. General Motors's return on equity of 8.33% beat Winnebago Industries's return on equity of -0.45%.

General Motors has a consensus price target of $53.77, signalling upside risk potential of 6.75%. On the other hand Winnebago Industries has an analysts' consensus of $48.92 which suggests that it could grow by 33.54%. Given that Winnebago Industries has higher upside potential than General Motors, analysts believe Winnebago Industries is more attractive than General Motors.

General Motors has a beta of 1.361, which suggesting that the stock is 36.127% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Winnebago Industries has a beta of 1.120, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.955%.

General Motors has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. Winnebago Industries offers a yield of 3.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. General Motors pays 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Winnebago Industries pays out 283.08% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Winnebago Industries's is not.

General Motors quarterly revenues are $44B, which are larger than Winnebago Industries quarterly revenues of $620.2M. General Motors's net income of $2.8B is higher than Winnebago Industries's net income of -$400K. Notably, General Motors's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.02x while Winnebago Industries's PE ratio is 196.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Motors is 0.29x versus 0.39x for Winnebago Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.