NVDA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Advanced Micro Devices has a net margin of 56.17% compared to NVIDIA's net margin of 6.29%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32% beat Advanced Micro Devices's return on equity of 2.9%.

NVIDIA has a consensus price target of $167.69, signalling upside risk potential of 49.45%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices has an analysts' consensus of $144.34 which suggests that it could grow by 51.47%. Given that Advanced Micro Devices has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe Advanced Micro Devices is more attractive than NVIDIA.

NVIDIA has a beta of 1.959, which suggesting that the stock is 95.871% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 1.887, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.664%.

NVIDIA has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.04%. Advanced Micro Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NVIDIA pays 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NVIDIA quarterly revenues are $39.3B, which are larger than Advanced Micro Devices quarterly revenues of $7.7B. NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B is higher than Advanced Micro Devices's net income of $482M. Notably, NVIDIA's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.19x while Advanced Micro Devices's PE ratio is 96.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NVIDIA is 21.33x versus 6.05x for Advanced Micro Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intel has a net margin of 56.17% compared to NVIDIA's net margin of -0.88%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.02%.

NVIDIA has a consensus price target of $167.69, signalling upside risk potential of 49.45%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $22.68 which suggests that it could grow by 14.27%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Intel.

NVIDIA has a beta of 1.959, which suggesting that the stock is 95.871% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.129, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.94%.

NVIDIA has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.04%. Intel offers a yield of 2.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. NVIDIA pays 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NVIDIA quarterly revenues are $39.3B, which are larger than Intel quarterly revenues of $14.3B. NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B is higher than Intel's net income of -$126M. Notably, NVIDIA's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.19x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NVIDIA is 21.33x versus 1.60x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLA has a net margin of 56.17% compared to NVIDIA's net margin of 26.8%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32% beat KLA's return on equity of 96.34%.

NVIDIA has a consensus price target of $167.69, signalling upside risk potential of 49.45%. On the other hand KLA has an analysts' consensus of $809.78 which suggests that it could grow by 19.75%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than KLA.

NVIDIA has a beta of 1.959, which suggesting that the stock is 95.871% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA has a beta of 1.370, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.998%.

NVIDIA has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.04%. KLA offers a yield of 0.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share. NVIDIA pays 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA pays out 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NVIDIA quarterly revenues are $39.3B, which are larger than KLA quarterly revenues of $3.1B. NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B is higher than KLA's net income of $824.5M. Notably, NVIDIA's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.19x while KLA's PE ratio is 28.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NVIDIA is 21.33x versus 8.42x for KLA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microchip Technology has a net margin of 56.17% compared to NVIDIA's net margin of -5.22%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32% beat Microchip Technology's return on equity of 4.76%.

NVIDIA has a consensus price target of $167.69, signalling upside risk potential of 49.45%. On the other hand Microchip Technology has an analysts' consensus of $63.87 which suggests that it could grow by 64.9%. Given that Microchip Technology has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe Microchip Technology is more attractive than NVIDIA.

NVIDIA has a beta of 1.959, which suggesting that the stock is 95.871% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microchip Technology has a beta of 1.513, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.332%.

NVIDIA has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.04%. Microchip Technology offers a yield of 4.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. NVIDIA pays 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Microchip Technology pays out 47.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NVIDIA quarterly revenues are $39.3B, which are larger than Microchip Technology quarterly revenues of $1B. NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B is higher than Microchip Technology's net income of -$53.6M. Notably, NVIDIA's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.19x while Microchip Technology's PE ratio is 69.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NVIDIA is 21.33x versus 4.41x for Microchip Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.