ADI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intel has a net margin of 16.15% compared to Analog Devices's net margin of -0.88%. Analog Devices's return on equity of 4.44% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.02%.

Analog Devices has a consensus price target of $256.12, signalling upside risk potential of 43.6%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $22.90 which suggests that it could grow by 6.34%. Given that Analog Devices has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Analog Devices is more attractive than Intel.

Analog Devices has a beta of 1.057, which suggesting that the stock is 5.655% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.129, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.94%.

Analog Devices has a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.1%. Intel offers a yield of 2.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Analog Devices pays 109.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend.

Analog Devices quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $14.3B. Analog Devices's net income of $391.3M is higher than Intel's net income of -$126M. Notably, Analog Devices's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.80x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Analog Devices is 9.53x versus 1.74x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microchip Technology has a net margin of 16.15% compared to Analog Devices's net margin of -5.22%. Analog Devices's return on equity of 4.44% beat Microchip Technology's return on equity of 4.76%.

Analog Devices has a consensus price target of $256.12, signalling upside risk potential of 43.6%. On the other hand Microchip Technology has an analysts' consensus of $64.52 which suggests that it could grow by 43.69%. Given that Microchip Technology has higher upside potential than Analog Devices, analysts believe Microchip Technology is more attractive than Analog Devices.

Analog Devices has a beta of 1.057, which suggesting that the stock is 5.655% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microchip Technology has a beta of 1.513, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.332%.

Analog Devices has a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.1%. Microchip Technology offers a yield of 4.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Analog Devices pays 109.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Microchip Technology pays out 47.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Microchip Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Analog Devices's is not.

Analog Devices quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Microchip Technology quarterly revenues of $1B. Analog Devices's net income of $391.3M is higher than Microchip Technology's net income of -$53.6M. Notably, Analog Devices's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.80x while Microchip Technology's PE ratio is 80.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Analog Devices is 9.53x versus 5.11x for Microchip Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 16.15% compared to Analog Devices's net margin of 11.02%. Analog Devices's return on equity of 4.44% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -6.29%.

Analog Devices has a consensus price target of $256.12, signalling upside risk potential of 43.6%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $110.18 which suggests that it could grow by 80.74%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than Analog Devices, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than Analog Devices.

Analog Devices has a beta of 1.057, which suggesting that the stock is 5.655% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.781, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.133%.

Analog Devices has a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.1%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Analog Devices pays 109.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend.

Analog Devices quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Analog Devices's net income of $391.3M is higher than Marvell Technology's net income of $200.2M. Notably, Analog Devices's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.80x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Analog Devices is 9.53x versus 9.15x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 16.15% compared to Analog Devices's net margin of 56.17%. Analog Devices's return on equity of 4.44% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

Analog Devices has a consensus price target of $256.12, signalling upside risk potential of 43.6%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $168.01 which suggests that it could grow by 46.96%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Analog Devices, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Analog Devices.

Analog Devices has a beta of 1.057, which suggesting that the stock is 5.655% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.959, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.871%.

Analog Devices has a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.1%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Analog Devices pays 109.8% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Analog Devices's is not.

Analog Devices quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. Analog Devices's net income of $391.3M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, Analog Devices's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.80x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 38.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Analog Devices is 9.53x versus 21.73x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.