KLAC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadcom has a net margin of 26.8% compared to KLA's net margin of 36.89%. KLA's return on equity of 96.34% beat Broadcom's return on equity of 14.67%.

KLA has a consensus price target of $820.53, signalling upside risk potential of 42.32%. On the other hand Broadcom has an analysts' consensus of $249.03 which suggests that it could grow by 70.23%. Given that Broadcom has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe Broadcom is more attractive than KLA.

KLA has a beta of 1.370, which suggesting that the stock is 36.998% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadcom has a beta of 1.055, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.474%.

KLA has a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. Broadcom offers a yield of 1.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. KLA pays 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcom pays out 166.48% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Broadcom's is not.

KLA quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are smaller than Broadcom quarterly revenues of $14.9B. KLA's net income of $824.5M is lower than Broadcom's net income of $5.5B. Notably, KLA's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.24x while Broadcom's PE ratio is 70.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KLA is 7.18x versus 12.83x for Broadcom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intel has a net margin of 26.8% compared to KLA's net margin of -0.88%. KLA's return on equity of 96.34% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.02%.

KLA has a consensus price target of $820.53, signalling upside risk potential of 42.32%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $22.96 which suggests that it could grow by 15.65%. Given that KLA has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe KLA is more attractive than Intel.

KLA has a beta of 1.370, which suggesting that the stock is 36.998% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.129, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.94%.

KLA has a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. Intel offers a yield of 2.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. KLA pays 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

KLA quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $14.3B. KLA's net income of $824.5M is higher than Intel's net income of -$126M. Notably, KLA's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.24x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KLA is 7.18x versus 1.60x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 26.8% compared to KLA's net margin of 11.02%. KLA's return on equity of 96.34% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -6.29%.

KLA has a consensus price target of $820.53, signalling upside risk potential of 42.32%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $112.79 which suggests that it could grow by 128.18%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than KLA.

KLA has a beta of 1.370, which suggesting that the stock is 36.998% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.781, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.133%.

KLA has a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. KLA pays 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

KLA quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.8B. KLA's net income of $824.5M is higher than Marvell Technology's net income of $200.2M. Notably, KLA's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.24x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KLA is 7.18x versus 7.42x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 26.8% compared to KLA's net margin of 56.17%. KLA's return on equity of 96.34% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

KLA has a consensus price target of $820.53, signalling upside risk potential of 42.32%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $170.01 which suggests that it could grow by 80.27%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than KLA.

KLA has a beta of 1.370, which suggesting that the stock is 36.998% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.959, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.871%.

KLA has a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. KLA pays 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

KLA quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. KLA's net income of $824.5M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, KLA's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.24x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 32.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KLA is 7.18x versus 17.93x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.