IRM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Invitation Homes has a net margin of -2.16% compared to Iron Mountain's net margin of 14.43%. Iron Mountain's return on equity of 50.64% beat Invitation Homes's return on equity of 4.35%.

Iron Mountain has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 16.44%. On the other hand Invitation Homes has an analysts' consensus of $37.77 which suggests that it could grow by 17.53%. Given that Invitation Homes has higher upside potential than Iron Mountain, analysts believe Invitation Homes is more attractive than Iron Mountain.

Iron Mountain has a beta of 0.989, which suggesting that the stock is 1.127% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invitation Homes has a beta of 1.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.488%.

Iron Mountain has a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.6%. Invitation Homes offers a yield of 4.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Iron Mountain pays 400.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Invitation Homes pays out 122.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Iron Mountain quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Invitation Homes quarterly revenues of $660.3M. Iron Mountain's net income of -$33.6M is lower than Invitation Homes's net income of $95.3M. Notably, Iron Mountain's price-to-earnings ratio is 291.94x while Invitation Homes's PE ratio is 45.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iron Mountain is 5.18x versus 7.63x for Invitation Homes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lamar Advertising has a net margin of -2.16% compared to Iron Mountain's net margin of 26.14%. Iron Mountain's return on equity of 50.64% beat Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 42.69%.

Iron Mountain has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 16.44%. On the other hand Lamar Advertising has an analysts' consensus of $133.95 which suggests that it could grow by 8.91%. Given that Iron Mountain has higher upside potential than Lamar Advertising, analysts believe Iron Mountain is more attractive than Lamar Advertising.

Iron Mountain has a beta of 0.989, which suggesting that the stock is 1.127% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.503, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.271%.

Iron Mountain has a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.6%. Lamar Advertising offers a yield of 4.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.65 per share. Iron Mountain pays 400.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamar Advertising pays out 103% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Iron Mountain quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Lamar Advertising quarterly revenues of $564.1M. Iron Mountain's net income of -$33.6M is lower than Lamar Advertising's net income of $147.5M. Notably, Iron Mountain's price-to-earnings ratio is 291.94x while Lamar Advertising's PE ratio is 24.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iron Mountain is 5.18x versus 5.77x for Lamar Advertising. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Outfront Media has a net margin of -2.16% compared to Iron Mountain's net margin of 7.66%. Iron Mountain's return on equity of 50.64% beat Outfront Media's return on equity of 32.95%.

Iron Mountain has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 16.44%. On the other hand Outfront Media has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.01%. Given that Iron Mountain has higher upside potential than Outfront Media, analysts believe Iron Mountain is more attractive than Outfront Media.

Iron Mountain has a beta of 0.989, which suggesting that the stock is 1.127% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Outfront Media has a beta of 1.976, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.633%.

Iron Mountain has a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.6%. Outfront Media offers a yield of 6.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Iron Mountain pays 400.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Outfront Media pays out -48.1% of its earnings as a dividend.

Iron Mountain quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Outfront Media quarterly revenues of $451.9M. Iron Mountain's net income of -$33.6M is lower than Outfront Media's net income of $34.6M. Notably, Iron Mountain's price-to-earnings ratio is 291.94x while Outfront Media's PE ratio is 13.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iron Mountain is 5.18x versus 1.66x for Outfront Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PotlatchDeltic has a net margin of -2.16% compared to Iron Mountain's net margin of 1.3%. Iron Mountain's return on equity of 50.64% beat PotlatchDeltic's return on equity of 0.77%.

Iron Mountain has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 16.44%. On the other hand PotlatchDeltic has an analysts' consensus of $51.71 which suggests that it could grow by 31.85%. Given that PotlatchDeltic has higher upside potential than Iron Mountain, analysts believe PotlatchDeltic is more attractive than Iron Mountain.

Iron Mountain has a beta of 0.989, which suggesting that the stock is 1.127% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PotlatchDeltic has a beta of 1.148, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.835%.

Iron Mountain has a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.6%. PotlatchDeltic offers a yield of 4.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Iron Mountain pays 400.39% of its earnings as a dividend. PotlatchDeltic pays out 231.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Iron Mountain quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than PotlatchDeltic quarterly revenues of $255.1M. Iron Mountain's net income of -$33.6M is lower than PotlatchDeltic's net income of $3.3M. Notably, Iron Mountain's price-to-earnings ratio is 291.94x while PotlatchDeltic's PE ratio is 189.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iron Mountain is 5.18x versus 2.92x for PotlatchDeltic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.