INVH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Innovative Industrial Properties has a net margin of 24.57% compared to Invitation Homes's net margin of 52.15%. Invitation Homes's return on equity of 4.8% beat Innovative Industrial Properties's return on equity of 8.3%.

Invitation Homes has a consensus price target of $37.27, signalling upside risk potential of 7.82%. On the other hand Innovative Industrial Properties has an analysts' consensus of $67.17 which suggests that it could grow by 20.67%. Given that Innovative Industrial Properties has higher upside potential than Invitation Homes, analysts believe Innovative Industrial Properties is more attractive than Invitation Homes.

Invitation Homes has a beta of 0.867, which suggesting that the stock is 13.257% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innovative Industrial Properties has a beta of 1.724, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.39%.

Invitation Homes has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.3%. Innovative Industrial Properties offers a yield of 13.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.90 per share. Invitation Homes pays 151.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Innovative Industrial Properties pays out 132.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Invitation Homes quarterly revenues are $674.5M, which are larger than Innovative Industrial Properties quarterly revenues of $76.7M. Invitation Homes's net income of $165.7M is higher than Innovative Industrial Properties's net income of $40M. Notably, Invitation Homes's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.90x while Innovative Industrial Properties's PE ratio is 10.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invitation Homes is 8.01x versus 5.15x for Innovative Industrial Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Iron Mountain has a net margin of 24.57% compared to Invitation Homes's net margin of 1%. Invitation Homes's return on equity of 4.8% beat Iron Mountain's return on equity of 236.21%.

Invitation Homes has a consensus price target of $37.27, signalling upside risk potential of 7.82%. On the other hand Iron Mountain has an analysts' consensus of $115.00 which suggests that it could grow by 18.88%. Given that Iron Mountain has higher upside potential than Invitation Homes, analysts believe Iron Mountain is more attractive than Invitation Homes.

Invitation Homes has a beta of 0.867, which suggesting that the stock is 13.257% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Iron Mountain has a beta of 1.083, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.321%.

Invitation Homes has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.3%. Iron Mountain offers a yield of 2.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. Invitation Homes pays 151.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Iron Mountain pays out 438.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Invitation Homes quarterly revenues are $674.5M, which are smaller than Iron Mountain quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Invitation Homes's net income of $165.7M is higher than Iron Mountain's net income of $16M. Notably, Invitation Homes's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.90x while Iron Mountain's PE ratio is 235.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invitation Homes is 8.01x versus 4.57x for Iron Mountain. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lamar Advertising has a net margin of 24.57% compared to Invitation Homes's net margin of -0.21%. Invitation Homes's return on equity of 4.8% beat Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 30.88%.

Invitation Homes has a consensus price target of $37.27, signalling upside risk potential of 7.82%. On the other hand Lamar Advertising has an analysts' consensus of $127.80 which suggests that it could grow by 10.87%. Given that Lamar Advertising has higher upside potential than Invitation Homes, analysts believe Lamar Advertising is more attractive than Invitation Homes.

Invitation Homes has a beta of 0.867, which suggesting that the stock is 13.257% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.379, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.929%.

Invitation Homes has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.3%. Lamar Advertising offers a yield of 4.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.55 per share. Invitation Homes pays 151.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamar Advertising pays out 160.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Invitation Homes quarterly revenues are $674.5M, which are larger than Lamar Advertising quarterly revenues of $579.6M. Invitation Homes's net income of $165.7M is higher than Lamar Advertising's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Invitation Homes's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.90x while Lamar Advertising's PE ratio is 32.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invitation Homes is 8.01x versus 5.36x for Lamar Advertising. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PotlatchDeltic has a net margin of 24.57% compared to Invitation Homes's net margin of 9.62%. Invitation Homes's return on equity of 4.8% beat PotlatchDeltic's return on equity of 2.32%.

Invitation Homes has a consensus price target of $37.27, signalling upside risk potential of 7.82%. On the other hand PotlatchDeltic has an analysts' consensus of $49.56 which suggests that it could grow by 29.9%. Given that PotlatchDeltic has higher upside potential than Invitation Homes, analysts believe PotlatchDeltic is more attractive than Invitation Homes.

Invitation Homes has a beta of 0.867, which suggesting that the stock is 13.257% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PotlatchDeltic has a beta of 1.167, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.72%.

Invitation Homes has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.3%. PotlatchDeltic offers a yield of 4.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Invitation Homes pays 151.84% of its earnings as a dividend. PotlatchDeltic pays out 650.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Invitation Homes quarterly revenues are $674.5M, which are larger than PotlatchDeltic quarterly revenues of $268.3M. Invitation Homes's net income of $165.7M is higher than PotlatchDeltic's net income of $25.8M. Notably, Invitation Homes's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.90x while PotlatchDeltic's PE ratio is 62.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invitation Homes is 8.01x versus 2.74x for PotlatchDeltic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.