EQIX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Invitation Homes has a net margin of -0.62% compared to Equinix's net margin of 21.71%. Equinix's return on equity of 6.34% beat Invitation Homes's return on equity of 4.52%.

Equinix has a consensus price target of $1,025.40, signalling upside risk potential of 27.95%. On the other hand Invitation Homes has an analysts' consensus of $36.82 which suggests that it could grow by 8.32%. Given that Equinix has higher upside potential than Invitation Homes, analysts believe Equinix is more attractive than Invitation Homes.

Equinix has a beta of 0.954, which suggesting that the stock is 4.569% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invitation Homes has a beta of 0.863, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.722%.

Equinix has a quarterly dividend of $4.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.18%. Invitation Homes offers a yield of 3.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Equinix pays 201.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Invitation Homes pays out 151.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinix quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Invitation Homes quarterly revenues of $659.1M. Equinix's net income of -$14M is lower than Invitation Homes's net income of $143.1M. Notably, Equinix's price-to-earnings ratio is 93.74x while Invitation Homes's PE ratio is 46.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinix is 8.78x versus 7.96x for Invitation Homes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Iron Mountain has a net margin of -0.62% compared to Equinix's net margin of 6.57%. Equinix's return on equity of 6.34% beat Iron Mountain's return on equity of 236.21%.

Equinix has a consensus price target of $1,025.40, signalling upside risk potential of 27.95%. On the other hand Iron Mountain has an analysts' consensus of $116.13 which suggests that it could grow by 39.74%. Given that Iron Mountain has higher upside potential than Equinix, analysts believe Iron Mountain is more attractive than Equinix.

Equinix has a beta of 0.954, which suggesting that the stock is 4.569% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Iron Mountain has a beta of 0.978, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.188%.

Equinix has a quarterly dividend of $4.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.18%. Iron Mountain offers a yield of 3.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. Equinix pays 201.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Iron Mountain pays out 438.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinix quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Iron Mountain quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Equinix's net income of -$14M is lower than Iron Mountain's net income of $103.9M. Notably, Equinix's price-to-earnings ratio is 93.74x while Iron Mountain's PE ratio is 136.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinix is 8.78x versus 3.99x for Iron Mountain. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lamar Advertising has a net margin of -0.62% compared to Equinix's net margin of -0.21%. Equinix's return on equity of 6.34% beat Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 30.88%.

Equinix has a consensus price target of $1,025.40, signalling upside risk potential of 27.95%. On the other hand Lamar Advertising has an analysts' consensus of $132.60 which suggests that it could grow by 21.15%. Given that Equinix has higher upside potential than Lamar Advertising, analysts believe Equinix is more attractive than Lamar Advertising.

Equinix has a beta of 0.954, which suggesting that the stock is 4.569% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.339, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.853%.

Equinix has a quarterly dividend of $4.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.18%. Lamar Advertising offers a yield of 5.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.55 per share. Equinix pays 201.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamar Advertising pays out 160.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinix quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Lamar Advertising quarterly revenues of $579.6M. Equinix's net income of -$14M is lower than Lamar Advertising's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Equinix's price-to-earnings ratio is 93.74x while Lamar Advertising's PE ratio is 31.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinix is 8.78x versus 5.09x for Lamar Advertising. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PotlatchDeltic has a net margin of -0.62% compared to Equinix's net margin of 2.01%. Equinix's return on equity of 6.34% beat PotlatchDeltic's return on equity of 1.04%.

Equinix has a consensus price target of $1,025.40, signalling upside risk potential of 27.95%. On the other hand PotlatchDeltic has an analysts' consensus of $50.38 which suggests that it could grow by 18.5%. Given that Equinix has higher upside potential than PotlatchDeltic, analysts believe Equinix is more attractive than PotlatchDeltic.

Equinix has a beta of 0.954, which suggesting that the stock is 4.569% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PotlatchDeltic has a beta of 1.125, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.539%.

Equinix has a quarterly dividend of $4.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.18%. PotlatchDeltic offers a yield of 4.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Equinix pays 201.6% of its earnings as a dividend. PotlatchDeltic pays out 650.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinix quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than PotlatchDeltic quarterly revenues of $258.1M. Equinix's net income of -$14M is lower than PotlatchDeltic's net income of $5.2M. Notably, Equinix's price-to-earnings ratio is 93.74x while PotlatchDeltic's PE ratio is 153.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinix is 8.78x versus 3.18x for PotlatchDeltic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.