GRMN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

SEALSQ has a net margin of 23.91% compared to Garmin's net margin of --. Garmin's return on equity of 19.27% beat SEALSQ's return on equity of -72.18%.

Garmin has a consensus price target of $212.57, signalling upside risk potential of 19.11%. On the other hand SEALSQ has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 155.32%. Given that SEALSQ has higher upside potential than Garmin, analysts believe SEALSQ is more attractive than Garmin.

Garmin has a beta of 0.925, which suggesting that the stock is 7.5% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SEALSQ has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Garmin has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.68%. SEALSQ offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Garmin pays 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. SEALSQ pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Garmin's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Garmin quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than SEALSQ quarterly revenues of --. Garmin's net income of $435.7M is higher than SEALSQ's net income of --. Notably, Garmin's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.41x while SEALSQ's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Garmin is 5.48x versus 5.94x for SEALSQ. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Logitech International SA has a net margin of 23.91% compared to Garmin's net margin of 14.93%. Garmin's return on equity of 19.27% beat Logitech International SA's return on equity of 30.08%.

Garmin has a consensus price target of $212.57, signalling upside risk potential of 19.11%. On the other hand Logitech International SA has an analysts' consensus of $95.72 which suggests that it could grow by 38.14%. Given that Logitech International SA has higher upside potential than Garmin, analysts believe Logitech International SA is more attractive than Garmin.

Garmin has a beta of 0.925, which suggesting that the stock is 7.5% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Logitech International SA has a beta of 0.943, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.717%.

Garmin has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.68%. Logitech International SA offers a yield of 1.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. Garmin pays 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Logitech International SA pays out 29.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Garmin quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Logitech International SA quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Garmin's net income of $435.7M is higher than Logitech International SA's net income of $200.1M. Notably, Garmin's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.41x while Logitech International SA's PE ratio is 16.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Garmin is 5.48x versus 2.34x for Logitech International SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sportradar Group AG has a net margin of 23.91% compared to Garmin's net margin of -0.36%. Garmin's return on equity of 19.27% beat Sportradar Group AG's return on equity of 3.89%.

Garmin has a consensus price target of $212.57, signalling upside risk potential of 19.11%. On the other hand Sportradar Group AG has an analysts' consensus of $25.60 which suggests that it could grow by 25.99%. Given that Sportradar Group AG has higher upside potential than Garmin, analysts believe Sportradar Group AG is more attractive than Garmin.

Garmin has a beta of 0.925, which suggesting that the stock is 7.5% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sportradar Group AG has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Garmin has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.68%. Sportradar Group AG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Garmin pays 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Sportradar Group AG pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Garmin's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Garmin quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Sportradar Group AG quarterly revenues of $327.3M. Garmin's net income of $435.7M is higher than Sportradar Group AG's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Garmin's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.41x while Sportradar Group AG's PE ratio is 178.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Garmin is 5.48x versus 5.40x for Sportradar Group AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WISeKey International Holding has a net margin of 23.91% compared to Garmin's net margin of --. Garmin's return on equity of 19.27% beat WISeKey International Holding's return on equity of -88.78%.

Garmin has a consensus price target of $212.57, signalling upside risk potential of 19.11%. On the other hand WISeKey International Holding has an analysts' consensus of $6.93 which suggests that it could grow by 104.46%. Given that WISeKey International Holding has higher upside potential than Garmin, analysts believe WISeKey International Holding is more attractive than Garmin.

Garmin has a beta of 0.925, which suggesting that the stock is 7.5% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WISeKey International Holding has a beta of 1.081, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.139%.

Garmin has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.68%. WISeKey International Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Garmin pays 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. WISeKey International Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Garmin's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Garmin quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than WISeKey International Holding quarterly revenues of --. Garmin's net income of $435.7M is higher than WISeKey International Holding's net income of --. Notably, Garmin's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.41x while WISeKey International Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Garmin is 5.48x versus 1.78x for WISeKey International Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.