SRAD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

SEALSQ has a net margin of -0.36% compared to Sportradar Group AG's net margin of --. Sportradar Group AG's return on equity of 3.89% beat SEALSQ's return on equity of -72.18%.

Sportradar Group AG has a consensus price target of $26.37, signalling upside risk potential of 16.82%. On the other hand SEALSQ has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 132.56%. Given that SEALSQ has higher upside potential than Sportradar Group AG, analysts believe SEALSQ is more attractive than Sportradar Group AG.

Sportradar Group AG has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SEALSQ has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Sportradar Group AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SEALSQ offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sportradar Group AG pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SEALSQ pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sportradar Group AG quarterly revenues are $327.3M, which are larger than SEALSQ quarterly revenues of --. Sportradar Group AG's net income of -$1.2M is higher than SEALSQ's net income of --. Notably, Sportradar Group AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 198.47x while SEALSQ's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sportradar Group AG is 6.00x versus 6.52x for SEALSQ. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Logitech International SA has a net margin of -0.36% compared to Sportradar Group AG's net margin of 14.93%. Sportradar Group AG's return on equity of 3.89% beat Logitech International SA's return on equity of 30.08%.

Sportradar Group AG has a consensus price target of $26.37, signalling upside risk potential of 16.82%. On the other hand Logitech International SA has an analysts' consensus of $91.35 which suggests that it could grow by 27.46%. Given that Logitech International SA has higher upside potential than Sportradar Group AG, analysts believe Logitech International SA is more attractive than Sportradar Group AG.

Sportradar Group AG has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Logitech International SA has a beta of 0.943, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.717%.

Sportradar Group AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Logitech International SA offers a yield of 1.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. Sportradar Group AG pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Logitech International SA pays out 29.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Logitech International SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sportradar Group AG quarterly revenues are $327.3M, which are smaller than Logitech International SA quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Sportradar Group AG's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Logitech International SA's net income of $200.1M. Notably, Sportradar Group AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 198.47x while Logitech International SA's PE ratio is 16.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sportradar Group AG is 6.00x versus 2.43x for Logitech International SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

STMicroelectronics NV has a net margin of -0.36% compared to Sportradar Group AG's net margin of 10.27%. Sportradar Group AG's return on equity of 3.89% beat STMicroelectronics NV's return on equity of 10.39%.

Sportradar Group AG has a consensus price target of $26.37, signalling upside risk potential of 16.82%. On the other hand STMicroelectronics NV has an analysts' consensus of $26.91 which suggests that it could grow by 31.59%. Given that STMicroelectronics NV has higher upside potential than Sportradar Group AG, analysts believe STMicroelectronics NV is more attractive than Sportradar Group AG.

Sportradar Group AG has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison STMicroelectronics NV has a beta of 1.556, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.589%.

Sportradar Group AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. STMicroelectronics NV offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Sportradar Group AG pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. STMicroelectronics NV pays out 18.5% of its earnings as a dividend. STMicroelectronics NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sportradar Group AG quarterly revenues are $327.3M, which are smaller than STMicroelectronics NV quarterly revenues of $3.3B. Sportradar Group AG's net income of -$1.2M is lower than STMicroelectronics NV's net income of $341M. Notably, Sportradar Group AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 198.47x while STMicroelectronics NV's PE ratio is 10.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sportradar Group AG is 6.00x versus 1.43x for STMicroelectronics NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WISeKey International Holding has a net margin of -0.36% compared to Sportradar Group AG's net margin of --. Sportradar Group AG's return on equity of 3.89% beat WISeKey International Holding's return on equity of -88.78%.

Sportradar Group AG has a consensus price target of $26.37, signalling upside risk potential of 16.82%. On the other hand WISeKey International Holding has an analysts' consensus of $6.93 which suggests that it could grow by 63.85%. Given that WISeKey International Holding has higher upside potential than Sportradar Group AG, analysts believe WISeKey International Holding is more attractive than Sportradar Group AG.

Sportradar Group AG has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WISeKey International Holding has a beta of 1.081, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.139%.

Sportradar Group AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WISeKey International Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sportradar Group AG pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WISeKey International Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sportradar Group AG quarterly revenues are $327.3M, which are larger than WISeKey International Holding quarterly revenues of --. Sportradar Group AG's net income of -$1.2M is higher than WISeKey International Holding's net income of --. Notably, Sportradar Group AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 198.47x while WISeKey International Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sportradar Group AG is 6.00x versus 1.78x for WISeKey International Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.