COP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of 16.2% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 1.12%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.57% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 12.35%.

ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $120.76, signalling upside risk potential of 35.72%. On the other hand Marathon Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $156.60 which suggests that it could grow by 22.55%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Marathon Petroleum, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.830, which suggesting that the stock is 16.992% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 1.038, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.789%.

ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.51%. Marathon Petroleum offers a yield of 2.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum pays out 33.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $14.2B, which are smaller than Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues of $33.1B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.3B is higher than Marathon Petroleum's net income of $371M. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.42x while Marathon Petroleum's PE ratio is 12.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 1.92x versus 0.31x for Marathon Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Occidental Petroleum has a net margin of 16.2% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of -1.88%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.57% beat Occidental Petroleum's return on equity of 9.38%.

ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $120.76, signalling upside risk potential of 35.72%. On the other hand Occidental Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $50.71 which suggests that it could grow by 28.35%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Occidental Petroleum, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Occidental Petroleum.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.830, which suggesting that the stock is 16.992% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Occidental Petroleum has a beta of 1.025, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.519%.

ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.51%. Occidental Petroleum offers a yield of 2.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Occidental Petroleum pays out 47.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $14.2B, which are larger than Occidental Petroleum quarterly revenues of $6.8B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.3B is higher than Occidental Petroleum's net income of -$127M. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.42x while Occidental Petroleum's PE ratio is 16.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 1.92x versus 1.44x for Occidental Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of 16.2% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 0.02%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.57% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 7%.

ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $120.76, signalling upside risk potential of 35.72%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $131.86 which suggests that it could grow by 33.06%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Phillips 66, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Phillips 66.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.830, which suggesting that the stock is 16.992% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.175, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.493%.

ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.51%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 4.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $14.2B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $33.7B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.3B is higher than Phillips 66's net income of $8M. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.42x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 20.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 1.92x versus 0.29x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valero Energy has a net margin of 16.2% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 0.91%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.57% beat Valero Energy's return on equity of 9.81%.

ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $120.76, signalling upside risk potential of 35.72%. On the other hand Valero Energy has an analysts' consensus of $142.84 which suggests that it could grow by 29.69%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Valero Energy, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Valero Energy.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.830, which suggesting that the stock is 16.992% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valero Energy has a beta of 1.172, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.193%.

ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.51%. Valero Energy offers a yield of 3.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy pays out 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $14.2B, which are smaller than Valero Energy quarterly revenues of $30.8B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.3B is higher than Valero Energy's net income of $281M. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.42x while Valero Energy's PE ratio is 12.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 1.92x versus 0.27x for Valero Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.