Financhill
Sell
39

FANG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$136.85
Seasonality move :
-0.98%
Day range:
$135.94 - $139.22
52-week range:
$114.00 - $214.50
Dividend yield:
3.85%
P/E ratio:
8.34x
P/S ratio:
2.56x
P/B ratio:
1.03x
Volume:
1.9M
Avg. volume:
2.1M
1-year change:
-31.09%
Market cap:
$39.8B
Revenue:
$11B
EPS (TTM):
$16.35

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
FANG
Diamondback Energy
$3.8B $4.20 35.5% -35.84% $181.77
APA
APA
$2.2B $0.82 -20.83% -61.12% $22.56
CVX
Chevron
$48.4B $2.15 -9.6% -25.69% $162.46
DVN
Devon Energy
$4.4B $1.22 3.87% -35.53% $43.40
EOG
EOG Resources
$5.9B $2.77 -10.89% -25.91% $136.24
XOM
Exxon Mobil
$86.1B $1.74 -11.4% -29.61% $123.65
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
FANG
Diamondback Energy
$136.28 $181.77 $39.8B 8.34x $1.00 3.85% 2.56x
APA
APA
$17.18 $22.56 $6.2B 6.18x $0.25 5.82% 0.61x
CVX
Chevron
$136.02 $162.46 $235.6B 15.55x $1.71 4.91% 1.26x
DVN
Devon Energy
$30.86 $43.40 $19.8B 7.03x $0.24 4.05% 1.17x
EOG
EOG Resources
$110.45 $136.24 $60.3B 10.25x $0.98 3.41% 2.66x
XOM
Exxon Mobil
$102.11 $123.65 $440.1B 13.54x $0.99 3.84% 1.32x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
FANG
Diamondback Energy
26.55% 0.334 28.27% 0.72x
APA
APA
49.69% -0.261 62.24% 0.68x
CVX
Chevron
16.59% 0.440 10.21% 0.68x
DVN
Devon Energy
37.91% -0.062 36.52% 0.90x
EOG
EOG Resources
13.85% 0.577 7.47% 1.61x
XOM
Exxon Mobil
12.51% -0.040 7.23% 0.86x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
FANG
Diamondback Energy
$1.8B $1.7B 9.23% 12.66% 47.98% $663M
APA
APA
$1B $773M 8.66% 17.49% 32.25% $306M
CVX
Chevron
$13.4B $4.3B 8.64% 10.01% 12.57% $1.3B
DVN
Devon Energy
$1.2B $1.1B 12.92% 20.2% 17.36% $1B
EOG
EOG Resources
$4B $2.1B 18.2% 20.78% 32.93% $806M
XOM
Exxon Mobil
$18.5B $9.8B 11% 12.7% 14.56% $7.1B

Diamondback Energy vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns FANG or APA?

    APA has a net margin of 34.86% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 13.16%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.66% beat APA's return on equity of 17.49%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FANG
    Diamondback Energy
    45% $4.83 $55.7B
    APA
    APA
    38.24% $0.96 $11.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About FANG or APA?

    Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $181.77, signalling upside risk potential of 33.38%. On the other hand APA has an analysts' consensus of $22.56 which suggests that it could grow by 31.33%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than APA, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than APA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FANG
    Diamondback Energy
    16 3 0
    APA
    APA
    4 17 3
  • Is FANG or APA More Risky?

    Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.063, which suggesting that the stock is 6.263% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison APA has a beta of 1.185, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.515%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FANG or APA?

    Diamondback Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. APA offers a yield of 5.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Diamondback Energy pays 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. APA pays out 43.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FANG or APA?

    Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than APA quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.4B is higher than APA's net income of $347M. Notably, Diamondback Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.34x while APA's PE ratio is 6.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamondback Energy is 2.56x versus 0.61x for APA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FANG
    Diamondback Energy
    2.56x 8.34x $4B $1.4B
    APA
    APA
    0.61x 6.18x $2.6B $347M
  • Which has Higher Returns FANG or CVX?

    Chevron has a net margin of 34.86% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 7.59%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.66% beat Chevron's return on equity of 10.01%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FANG
    Diamondback Energy
    45% $4.83 $55.7B
    CVX
    Chevron
    29% $2.00 $179.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About FANG or CVX?

    Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $181.77, signalling upside risk potential of 33.38%. On the other hand Chevron has an analysts' consensus of $162.46 which suggests that it could grow by 19.44%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than Chevron, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than Chevron.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FANG
    Diamondback Energy
    16 3 0
    CVX
    Chevron
    9 9 1
  • Is FANG or CVX More Risky?

    Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.063, which suggesting that the stock is 6.263% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chevron has a beta of 0.833, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.684%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FANG or CVX?

    Diamondback Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. Chevron offers a yield of 4.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share. Diamondback Energy pays 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Chevron pays out 66.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FANG or CVX?

    Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues are $4B, which are smaller than Chevron quarterly revenues of $46.1B. Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.4B is lower than Chevron's net income of $3.5B. Notably, Diamondback Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.34x while Chevron's PE ratio is 15.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamondback Energy is 2.56x versus 1.26x for Chevron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FANG
    Diamondback Energy
    2.56x 8.34x $4B $1.4B
    CVX
    Chevron
    1.26x 15.55x $46.1B $3.5B
  • Which has Higher Returns FANG or DVN?

    Devon Energy has a net margin of 34.86% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 11.1%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.66% beat Devon Energy's return on equity of 20.2%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FANG
    Diamondback Energy
    45% $4.83 $55.7B
    DVN
    Devon Energy
    26.78% $0.77 $23.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About FANG or DVN?

    Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $181.77, signalling upside risk potential of 33.38%. On the other hand Devon Energy has an analysts' consensus of $43.40 which suggests that it could grow by 40.65%. Given that Devon Energy has higher upside potential than Diamondback Energy, analysts believe Devon Energy is more attractive than Diamondback Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FANG
    Diamondback Energy
    16 3 0
    DVN
    Devon Energy
    12 8 0
  • Is FANG or DVN More Risky?

    Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.063, which suggesting that the stock is 6.263% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Devon Energy has a beta of 1.023, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.298%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FANG or DVN?

    Diamondback Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. Devon Energy offers a yield of 4.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Diamondback Energy pays 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Devon Energy pays out 32.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FANG or DVN?

    Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues are $4B, which are smaller than Devon Energy quarterly revenues of $4.5B. Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.4B is higher than Devon Energy's net income of $494M. Notably, Diamondback Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.34x while Devon Energy's PE ratio is 7.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamondback Energy is 2.56x versus 1.17x for Devon Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FANG
    Diamondback Energy
    2.56x 8.34x $4B $1.4B
    DVN
    Devon Energy
    1.17x 7.03x $4.5B $494M
  • Which has Higher Returns FANG or EOG?

    EOG Resources has a net margin of 34.86% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 25.04%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.66% beat EOG Resources's return on equity of 20.78%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FANG
    Diamondback Energy
    45% $4.83 $55.7B
    EOG
    EOG Resources
    68.26% $2.65 $34.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About FANG or EOG?

    Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $181.77, signalling upside risk potential of 33.38%. On the other hand EOG Resources has an analysts' consensus of $136.24 which suggests that it could grow by 23.35%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than EOG Resources, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than EOG Resources.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FANG
    Diamondback Energy
    16 3 0
    EOG
    EOG Resources
    14 13 0
  • Is FANG or EOG More Risky?

    Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.063, which suggesting that the stock is 6.263% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EOG Resources has a beta of 0.782, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.762%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FANG or EOG?

    Diamondback Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. EOG Resources offers a yield of 3.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share. Diamondback Energy pays 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. EOG Resources pays out 32.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FANG or EOG?

    Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues are $4B, which are smaller than EOG Resources quarterly revenues of $5.8B. Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.4B is lower than EOG Resources's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Diamondback Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.34x while EOG Resources's PE ratio is 10.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamondback Energy is 2.56x versus 2.66x for EOG Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FANG
    Diamondback Energy
    2.56x 8.34x $4B $1.4B
    EOG
    EOG Resources
    2.66x 10.25x $5.8B $1.5B
  • Which has Higher Returns FANG or XOM?

    Exxon Mobil has a net margin of 34.86% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 9.52%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.66% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 12.7%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FANG
    Diamondback Energy
    45% $4.83 $55.7B
    XOM
    Exxon Mobil
    22.81% $1.76 $307.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About FANG or XOM?

    Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $181.77, signalling upside risk potential of 33.38%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $123.65 which suggests that it could grow by 21.09%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than Exxon Mobil.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FANG
    Diamondback Energy
    16 3 0
    XOM
    Exxon Mobil
    10 10 0
  • Is FANG or XOM More Risky?

    Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.063, which suggesting that the stock is 6.263% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.509, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.105%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FANG or XOM?

    Diamondback Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Diamondback Energy pays 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FANG or XOM?

    Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues are $4B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.4B is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.7B. Notably, Diamondback Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.34x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 13.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamondback Energy is 2.56x versus 1.32x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FANG
    Diamondback Energy
    2.56x 8.34x $4B $1.4B
    XOM
    Exxon Mobil
    1.32x 13.54x $81.1B $7.7B

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Microsoft Stock Outlook, Azure & AI as Drivers of Long-Term Growth
Microsoft Stock Outlook, Azure & AI as Drivers of Long-Term Growth

Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) has been among the top growth stocks of…

Is Tesla Stock Overvalued or a Buy for the Next Decade?
Is Tesla Stock Overvalued or a Buy for the Next Decade?

Shares of EV major Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) have experienced extreme volatility…

Is Apple Stock Undervalued or Overvalued?
Is Apple Stock Undervalued or Overvalued?

For many years, Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) was just about the perfect…

Stock Ideas

Buy
67
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Buy
68
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 46x

Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Alerts

Buy
80
SBET alert for May 29

SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is up 50.89% over the past day.

Buy
100
BOX alert for May 29

Box [BOX] is down 0.81% over the past day.

Sell
22
OKTA alert for May 29

Okta [OKTA] is up 1.91% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock