VLO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chevron has a net margin of -1.97% compared to Valero Energy's net margin of 7.59%. Valero Energy's return on equity of 3.35% beat Chevron's return on equity of 10.01%.

Valero Energy has a consensus price target of $143.52, signalling upside risk potential of 8.56%. On the other hand Chevron has an analysts' consensus of $163.38 which suggests that it could grow by 19.02%. Given that Chevron has higher upside potential than Valero Energy, analysts believe Chevron is more attractive than Valero Energy.

Valero Energy has a beta of 0.980, which suggesting that the stock is 2.044% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chevron has a beta of 0.833, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.684%.

Valero Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.33%. Chevron offers a yield of 4.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share. Valero Energy pays 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Chevron pays out 66.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Valero Energy quarterly revenues are $30.3B, which are smaller than Chevron quarterly revenues of $46.1B. Valero Energy's net income of -$595M is lower than Chevron's net income of $3.5B. Notably, Valero Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.72x while Chevron's PE ratio is 15.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy is 0.33x versus 1.28x for Chevron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of -1.97% compared to Valero Energy's net margin of -0.24%. Valero Energy's return on equity of 3.35% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 9.28%.

Valero Energy has a consensus price target of $143.52, signalling upside risk potential of 8.56%. On the other hand Marathon Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $162.07 which suggests that it could grow by 0.33%. Given that Valero Energy has higher upside potential than Marathon Petroleum, analysts believe Valero Energy is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum.

Valero Energy has a beta of 0.980, which suggesting that the stock is 2.044% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.867, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.254%.

Valero Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.33%. Marathon Petroleum offers a yield of 2.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. Valero Energy pays 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum pays out 33.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Valero Energy quarterly revenues are $30.3B, which are smaller than Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues of $31.5B. Valero Energy's net income of -$595M is lower than Marathon Petroleum's net income of -$74M. Notably, Valero Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.72x while Marathon Petroleum's PE ratio is 22.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy is 0.33x versus 0.39x for Marathon Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of -1.97% compared to Valero Energy's net margin of 1.6%. Valero Energy's return on equity of 3.35% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 6.28%.

Valero Energy has a consensus price target of $143.52, signalling upside risk potential of 8.56%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $133.12 which suggests that it could grow by 10.1%. Given that Phillips 66 has higher upside potential than Valero Energy, analysts believe Phillips 66 is more attractive than Valero Energy.

Valero Energy has a beta of 0.980, which suggesting that the stock is 2.044% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.212%.

Valero Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.33%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 3.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Valero Energy pays 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Valero Energy quarterly revenues are $30.3B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $30.4B. Valero Energy's net income of -$595M is lower than Phillips 66's net income of $487M. Notably, Valero Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.72x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 27.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy is 0.33x versus 0.37x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of -1.97% compared to Valero Energy's net margin of 9.52%. Valero Energy's return on equity of 3.35% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 12.7%.

Valero Energy has a consensus price target of $143.52, signalling upside risk potential of 8.56%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $123.64 which suggests that it could grow by 17.81%. Given that Exxon Mobil has higher upside potential than Valero Energy, analysts believe Exxon Mobil is more attractive than Valero Energy.

Valero Energy has a beta of 0.980, which suggesting that the stock is 2.044% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.509, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.105%.

Valero Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.33%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Valero Energy pays 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Valero Energy quarterly revenues are $30.3B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Valero Energy's net income of -$595M is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.7B. Notably, Valero Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.72x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 13.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy is 0.33x versus 1.36x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.