Financhill
Sell
45

VLO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$118.94
Seasonality move :
-5.38%
Day range:
$114.76 - $119.42
52-week range:
$99.00 - $167.78
Dividend yield:
3.65%
P/E ratio:
42.02x
P/S ratio:
0.29x
P/B ratio:
1.59x
Volume:
2.6M
Avg. volume:
4M
1-year change:
-24.41%
Market cap:
$37.2B
Revenue:
$129.9B
EPS (TTM):
$2.83

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
VLO
Valero Energy
$28.6B $2.46 -20.04% -27.5% $141.25
COP
ConocoPhillips
$14.9B $1.58 6.92% -18.16% $117.47
CVX
Chevron
$52.2B $1.95 -6.92% -20.99% $166.32
MPC
Marathon Petroleum
$32.2B $3.29 -14.66% -24.1% $156.02
PSX
Phillips 66
$32.4B $1.96 -13.13% -30.97% $128.97
XOM
Exxon Mobil
$91.8B $1.48 -12.01% -28.67% $124.06
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
VLO
Valero Energy
$118.93 $141.25 $37.2B 42.02x $1.13 3.65% 0.29x
COP
ConocoPhillips
$91.41 $117.47 $115.6B 11.73x $0.78 3.41% 1.97x
CVX
Chevron
$138.50 $166.32 $243.8B 14.25x $1.71 4.77% 1.30x
MPC
Marathon Petroleum
$141.55 $156.02 $44.2B 14.25x $0.91 2.45% 0.35x
PSX
Phillips 66
$107.15 $128.97 $43.7B 24.41x $1.15 4.29% 0.32x
XOM
Exxon Mobil
$106.21 $124.06 $459.4B 13.55x $0.99 3.65% 1.35x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
VLO
Valero Energy
31.6% 0.797 24.56% 1.05x
COP
ConocoPhillips
26.52% -0.282 18.48% 1.06x
CVX
Chevron
13.58% 0.440 9.31% 0.71x
MPC
Marathon Petroleum
60.76% 0.855 54.05% 0.69x
PSX
Phillips 66
40.81% 1.209 36.58% 0.79x
XOM
Exxon Mobil
12.53% -0.040 7.95% 0.95x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
VLO
Valero Energy
$496M $231M 2.41% 3.35% -2.58% $703M
COP
ConocoPhillips
$4.2B $3B 12.87% 17.57% 22.8% $1.1B
CVX
Chevron
$13.2B $2.4B 9.71% 11.12% 12.95% $4.4B
MPC
Marathon Petroleum
$1.8B $812M 6.18% 12.35% 3.74% $1.4B
PSX
Phillips 66
$2B -$395M 3.76% 6.28% 2.9% -$236M
XOM
Exxon Mobil
$17.2B $7.8B 11.61% 13.48% 12.47% $5.4B

Valero Energy vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns VLO or COP?

    ConocoPhillips has a net margin of -1.97% compared to Valero Energy's net margin of 16.2%. Valero Energy's return on equity of 3.35% beat ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.57%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    VLO
    Valero Energy
    1.64% -$1.90 $37.2B
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    29.42% $1.90 $88.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About VLO or COP?

    Valero Energy has a consensus price target of $141.25, signalling upside risk potential of 18.77%. On the other hand ConocoPhillips has an analysts' consensus of $117.47 which suggests that it could grow by 28.51%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Valero Energy, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Valero Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    VLO
    Valero Energy
    10 5 0
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    13 3 0
  • Is VLO or COP More Risky?

    Valero Energy has a beta of 0.980, which suggesting that the stock is 2.044% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.637, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.349%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock VLO or COP?

    Valero Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.65%. ConocoPhillips offers a yield of 3.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. Valero Energy pays 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. ConocoPhillips pays out 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios VLO or COP?

    Valero Energy quarterly revenues are $30.3B, which are larger than ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues of $14.2B. Valero Energy's net income of -$595M is lower than ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.3B. Notably, Valero Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.02x while ConocoPhillips's PE ratio is 11.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy is 0.29x versus 1.97x for ConocoPhillips. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    VLO
    Valero Energy
    0.29x 42.02x $30.3B -$595M
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    1.97x 11.73x $14.2B $2.3B
  • Which has Higher Returns VLO or CVX?

    Chevron has a net margin of -1.97% compared to Valero Energy's net margin of 6.7%. Valero Energy's return on equity of 3.35% beat Chevron's return on equity of 11.12%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    VLO
    Valero Energy
    1.64% -$1.90 $37.2B
    CVX
    Chevron
    27.34% $1.84 $177.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About VLO or CVX?

    Valero Energy has a consensus price target of $141.25, signalling upside risk potential of 18.77%. On the other hand Chevron has an analysts' consensus of $166.32 which suggests that it could grow by 20.08%. Given that Chevron has higher upside potential than Valero Energy, analysts believe Chevron is more attractive than Valero Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    VLO
    Valero Energy
    10 5 0
    CVX
    Chevron
    8 8 1
  • Is VLO or CVX More Risky?

    Valero Energy has a beta of 0.980, which suggesting that the stock is 2.044% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chevron has a beta of 0.833, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.684%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock VLO or CVX?

    Valero Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.65%. Chevron offers a yield of 4.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share. Valero Energy pays 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Chevron pays out 66.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios VLO or CVX?

    Valero Energy quarterly revenues are $30.3B, which are smaller than Chevron quarterly revenues of $48.3B. Valero Energy's net income of -$595M is lower than Chevron's net income of $3.2B. Notably, Valero Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.02x while Chevron's PE ratio is 14.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy is 0.29x versus 1.30x for Chevron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    VLO
    Valero Energy
    0.29x 42.02x $30.3B -$595M
    CVX
    Chevron
    1.30x 14.25x $48.3B $3.2B
  • Which has Higher Returns VLO or MPC?

    Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of -1.97% compared to Valero Energy's net margin of 1.12%. Valero Energy's return on equity of 3.35% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 12.35%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    VLO
    Valero Energy
    1.64% -$1.90 $37.2B
    MPC
    Marathon Petroleum
    5.29% $1.15 $52B
  • What do Analysts Say About VLO or MPC?

    Valero Energy has a consensus price target of $141.25, signalling upside risk potential of 18.77%. On the other hand Marathon Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $156.02 which suggests that it could grow by 10.22%. Given that Valero Energy has higher upside potential than Marathon Petroleum, analysts believe Valero Energy is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    VLO
    Valero Energy
    10 5 0
    MPC
    Marathon Petroleum
    6 7 0
  • Is VLO or MPC More Risky?

    Valero Energy has a beta of 0.980, which suggesting that the stock is 2.044% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.867, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.254%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock VLO or MPC?

    Valero Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.65%. Marathon Petroleum offers a yield of 2.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. Valero Energy pays 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum pays out 33.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios VLO or MPC?

    Valero Energy quarterly revenues are $30.3B, which are smaller than Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues of $33.1B. Valero Energy's net income of -$595M is lower than Marathon Petroleum's net income of $371M. Notably, Valero Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.02x while Marathon Petroleum's PE ratio is 14.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy is 0.29x versus 0.35x for Marathon Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    VLO
    Valero Energy
    0.29x 42.02x $30.3B -$595M
    MPC
    Marathon Petroleum
    0.35x 14.25x $33.1B $371M
  • Which has Higher Returns VLO or PSX?

    Phillips 66 has a net margin of -1.97% compared to Valero Energy's net margin of 1.6%. Valero Energy's return on equity of 3.35% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 6.28%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    VLO
    Valero Energy
    1.64% -$1.90 $37.2B
    PSX
    Phillips 66
    6.5% $1.18 $47.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About VLO or PSX?

    Valero Energy has a consensus price target of $141.25, signalling upside risk potential of 18.77%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $128.97 which suggests that it could grow by 20.36%. Given that Phillips 66 has higher upside potential than Valero Energy, analysts believe Phillips 66 is more attractive than Valero Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    VLO
    Valero Energy
    10 5 0
    PSX
    Phillips 66
    8 6 0
  • Is VLO or PSX More Risky?

    Valero Energy has a beta of 0.980, which suggesting that the stock is 2.044% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.212%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock VLO or PSX?

    Valero Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.65%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 4.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. Valero Energy pays 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios VLO or PSX?

    Valero Energy quarterly revenues are $30.3B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $30.4B. Valero Energy's net income of -$595M is lower than Phillips 66's net income of $487M. Notably, Valero Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.02x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 24.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy is 0.29x versus 0.32x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    VLO
    Valero Energy
    0.29x 42.02x $30.3B -$595M
    PSX
    Phillips 66
    0.32x 24.41x $30.4B $487M
  • Which has Higher Returns VLO or XOM?

    Exxon Mobil has a net margin of -1.97% compared to Valero Energy's net margin of 9.39%. Valero Energy's return on equity of 3.35% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 13.48%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    VLO
    Valero Energy
    1.64% -$1.90 $37.2B
    XOM
    Exxon Mobil
    21.28% $1.72 $308.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About VLO or XOM?

    Valero Energy has a consensus price target of $141.25, signalling upside risk potential of 18.77%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $124.06 which suggests that it could grow by 16.81%. Given that Valero Energy has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil, analysts believe Valero Energy is more attractive than Exxon Mobil.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    VLO
    Valero Energy
    10 5 0
    XOM
    Exxon Mobil
    9 10 0
  • Is VLO or XOM More Risky?

    Valero Energy has a beta of 0.980, which suggesting that the stock is 2.044% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.509, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.105%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock VLO or XOM?

    Valero Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.65%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Valero Energy pays 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios VLO or XOM?

    Valero Energy quarterly revenues are $30.3B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Valero Energy's net income of -$595M is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.6B. Notably, Valero Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.02x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 13.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy is 0.29x versus 1.35x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    VLO
    Valero Energy
    0.29x 42.02x $30.3B -$595M
    XOM
    Exxon Mobil
    1.35x 13.55x $81.1B $7.6B

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Did Cathie Wood Buy AMD?
Why Did Cathie Wood Buy AMD?

Noted tech investor Cathie Wood has used the recent stock…

Why Did Salesforce Stock Drop After a Strong Quarter?
Why Did Salesforce Stock Drop After a Strong Quarter?

Popular customer relationship management platform provider Salesforce (NYSE:CRM) has been…

Is Adobe Stock a Bargain With AI Tools Driving Growth?
Is Adobe Stock a Bargain With AI Tools Driving Growth?

The share price of American computer software company Adobe (NASDAQ:ADBE)…

Stock Ideas

Buy
71
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 34x

Buy
63
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Alerts

Sell
4
CABO alert for May 3

Cable One [CABO] is down 41.98% over the past day.

Buy
55
PDEX alert for May 3

Pro-Dex [PDEX] is down 32.02% over the past day.

Buy
91
TRUP alert for May 3

Trupanion [TRUP] is up 23.52% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock