JCHI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

SPDR S&P China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to JPMorgan Active China ETF's net margin of --. JPMorgan Active China ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of --.

JPMorgan Active China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR S&P China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that JPMorgan Active China ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR S&P China ETF, analysts believe JPMorgan Active China ETF is more attractive than SPDR S&P China ETF.

JPMorgan Active China ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.785, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.456%.

JPMorgan Active China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. SPDR S&P China ETF offers a yield of 2.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. JPMorgan Active China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR S&P China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

JPMorgan Active China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues of --. JPMorgan Active China ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of --. Notably, JPMorgan Active China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR S&P China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JPMorgan Active China ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR S&P China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Matthews China Active ETF has a net margin of -- compared to JPMorgan Active China ETF's net margin of --. JPMorgan Active China ETF's return on equity of -- beat Matthews China Active ETF's return on equity of --.

JPMorgan Active China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Matthews China Active ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that JPMorgan Active China ETF has higher upside potential than Matthews China Active ETF, analysts believe JPMorgan Active China ETF is more attractive than Matthews China Active ETF.

JPMorgan Active China ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matthews China Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

JPMorgan Active China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. Matthews China Active ETF offers a yield of 1.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. JPMorgan Active China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matthews China Active ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

JPMorgan Active China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Matthews China Active ETF quarterly revenues of --. JPMorgan Active China ETF's net income of -- is lower than Matthews China Active ETF's net income of --. Notably, JPMorgan Active China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Matthews China Active ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JPMorgan Active China ETF is -- versus -- for Matthews China Active ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

iShares MSCI China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to JPMorgan Active China ETF's net margin of --. JPMorgan Active China ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI China ETF's return on equity of --.

JPMorgan Active China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that JPMorgan Active China ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI China ETF, analysts believe JPMorgan Active China ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI China ETF.

JPMorgan Active China ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI China ETF has a beta of 0.801, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.867%.

JPMorgan Active China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. iShares MSCI China ETF offers a yield of 2.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share. JPMorgan Active China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

JPMorgan Active China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI China ETF quarterly revenues of --. JPMorgan Active China ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI China ETF's net income of --. Notably, JPMorgan Active China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JPMorgan Active China ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to JPMorgan Active China ETF's net margin of --. JPMorgan Active China ETF's return on equity of -- beat Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF's return on equity of --.

JPMorgan Active China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that JPMorgan Active China ETF has higher upside potential than Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF, analysts believe JPMorgan Active China ETF is more attractive than Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF.

JPMorgan Active China ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

JPMorgan Active China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF offers a yield of 4.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. JPMorgan Active China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

JPMorgan Active China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. JPMorgan Active China ETF's net income of -- is lower than Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, JPMorgan Active China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JPMorgan Active China ETF is -- versus -- for Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.