Is Target a Dividend King?
Popular retail giant Target Corporation (NYSE:TGT) has been in a…
Sell
25
GXC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$72.92
Seasonality move
:
1.47%
Day range:
$71.00 - $71.20
52-week range:
$59.45 - $97.17
Dividend yield:
2.99%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
10.5K
Avg. volume:
39K
1-year change:
10.31%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
$71.15 | -- | -- | -- | $1.50 | 2.99% | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
$28.03 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 1.82% | -- |
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
$17.32 | -- | -- | -- | $0.41 | 3.05% | -- |
|
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
|
$22.23 | -- | -- | -- | $0.51 | 2.3% | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
$24.56 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 5.01% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | 1.328 | -- | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
-- | 1.759 | -- | -- |
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
-- | 1.401 | -- | -- |
|
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
|
-- | 1.310 | -- | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | 1.854 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
SPDR S&P China ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GXC or CXSE?
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P China ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of -- beat WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- CXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GXC or CXSE?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P China ETF has higher upside potential than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund, analysts believe SPDR S&P China ETF is more attractive than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 CXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund0 0 0 -
Is GXC or CXSE More Risky?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.785, which suggesting that the stock is 21.456% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund has a beta of 0.856, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.373%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXC or CXSE?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.99%. WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund offers a yield of 1.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. SPDR S&P China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXC or CXSE?
SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of -- is lower than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P China ETF is -- versus -- for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -- CXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GXC or FLCH?
Franklin FTSE China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P China ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of -- beat Franklin FTSE China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GXC or FLCH?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Franklin FTSE China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P China ETF has higher upside potential than Franklin FTSE China ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P China ETF is more attractive than Franklin FTSE China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF0 0 0 -
Is GXC or FLCH More Risky?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.785, which suggesting that the stock is 21.456% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin FTSE China ETF has a beta of 0.797, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.261%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXC or FLCH?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.99%. Franklin FTSE China ETF offers a yield of 3.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. SPDR S&P China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin FTSE China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXC or FLCH?
SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Franklin FTSE China ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of -- is lower than Franklin FTSE China ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin FTSE China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P China ETF is -- versus -- for Franklin FTSE China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -- FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GXC or KBA?
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P China ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- KBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GXC or KBA?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P China ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P China ETF is more attractive than KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 KBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF0 0 0 -
Is GXC or KBA More Risky?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.785, which suggesting that the stock is 21.456% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has a beta of 0.628, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.246%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXC or KBA?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.99%. KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF offers a yield of 2.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. SPDR S&P China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXC or KBA?
SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P China ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -- KBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GXC or PGJ?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P China ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GXC or PGJ?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P China ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P China ETF is more attractive than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF0 0 0 -
Is GXC or PGJ More Risky?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.785, which suggesting that the stock is 21.456% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a beta of 1.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.1%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXC or PGJ?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.99%. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF offers a yield of 5.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. SPDR S&P China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXC or PGJ?
SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P China ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -- PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is COWZ ETF a Good Investment?
There’s a reason even Warren Buffett advocates his heirs to…
3 Stocks Buffett Is Betting On
Warren Buffett appeared to take a hard look at the…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 112x
Sell
40
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
61
ITCI alert for Jan 14
Intra-Cellular Therapies [ITCI] is down 0.26% over the past day.
Sell
30
ESTA alert for Jan 14
Establishment Labs Holdings [ESTA] is down 1.51% over the past day.
Buy
72
DJT alert for Jan 14
Trump Media & Technology Group [DJT] is down 8.25% over the past day.
