Is Target a Dividend King?
Popular retail giant Target Corporation (NYSE:TGT) has been in a…
Buy
56
RAYC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$13.80
Seasonality move
:
0.24%
Day range:
$13.78 - $13.81
52-week range:
$11.88 - $19.61
Dividend yield:
4.22%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
1.9K
Avg. volume:
40.4K
1-year change:
11.65%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RAYC
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JCHI
JPMorgan Active China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MCH
Matthews China Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RAYC
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF
|
$13.79 | -- | -- | -- | $0.58 | 4.22% | -- |
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
$25.72 | -- | -- | -- | $0.30 | 1.16% | -- |
|
JCHI
JPMorgan Active China ETF
|
$41.18 | -- | -- | -- | $0.92 | 2.24% | -- |
|
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
|
$22.70 | -- | -- | -- | $0.51 | 2.25% | -- |
|
MCH
Matthews China Active ETF
|
$21.30 | -- | -- | -- | $0.29 | 1.36% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RAYC
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF
|
-- | 1.174 | -- | -- |
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | 1.273 | -- | -- |
|
JCHI
JPMorgan Active China ETF
|
-- | 1.267 | -- | -- |
|
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
|
-- | 1.310 | -- | -- |
|
MCH
Matthews China Active ETF
|
-- | 1.642 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RAYC
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JCHI
JPMorgan Active China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MCH
Matthews China Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns RAYC or ASHR?
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF's net margin of --. Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RAYCRayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF-- -- -- ASHRXtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RAYC or ASHR?
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF has higher upside potential than Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF, analysts believe Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF is more attractive than Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RAYCRayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF0 0 0 ASHRXtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF0 0 0 -
Is RAYC or ASHR More Risky?
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has a beta of 0.672, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.848%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RAYC or ASHR?
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.22%. Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF offers a yield of 1.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RAYC or ASHR?
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF quarterly revenues of --. Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's net income of --. Notably, Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF is -- versus -- for Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RAYCRayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF-- -- -- -- ASHRXtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RAYC or JCHI?
JPMorgan Active China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF's net margin of --. Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat JPMorgan Active China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RAYCRayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF-- -- -- JCHIJPMorgan Active China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RAYC or JCHI?
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand JPMorgan Active China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF has higher upside potential than JPMorgan Active China ETF, analysts believe Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF is more attractive than JPMorgan Active China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RAYCRayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF0 0 0 JCHIJPMorgan Active China ETF0 0 0 -
Is RAYC or JCHI More Risky?
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JPMorgan Active China ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RAYC or JCHI?
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.22%. JPMorgan Active China ETF offers a yield of 2.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share. Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JPMorgan Active China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RAYC or JCHI?
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than JPMorgan Active China ETF quarterly revenues of --. Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than JPMorgan Active China ETF's net income of --. Notably, Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while JPMorgan Active China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF is -- versus -- for JPMorgan Active China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RAYCRayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF-- -- -- -- JCHIJPMorgan Active China ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RAYC or KBA?
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF's net margin of --. Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RAYCRayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF-- -- -- KBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RAYC or KBA?
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF, analysts believe Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF is more attractive than KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RAYCRayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF0 0 0 KBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF0 0 0 -
Is RAYC or KBA More Risky?
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has a beta of 0.628, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.246%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RAYC or KBA?
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.22%. KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF offers a yield of 2.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RAYC or KBA?
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF quarterly revenues of --. Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's net income of --. Notably, Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RAYCRayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF-- -- -- -- KBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RAYC or MCH?
Matthews China Active ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF's net margin of --. Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF's return on equity of -- beat Matthews China Active ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RAYCRayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF-- -- -- MCHMatthews China Active ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RAYC or MCH?
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Matthews China Active ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF has higher upside potential than Matthews China Active ETF, analysts believe Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF is more attractive than Matthews China Active ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RAYCRayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF0 0 0 MCHMatthews China Active ETF0 0 0 -
Is RAYC or MCH More Risky?
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matthews China Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RAYC or MCH?
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.22%. Matthews China Active ETF offers a yield of 1.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matthews China Active ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RAYC or MCH?
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Matthews China Active ETF quarterly revenues of --. Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF's net income of -- is lower than Matthews China Active ETF's net income of --. Notably, Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Matthews China Active ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF is -- versus -- for Matthews China Active ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RAYCRayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF-- -- -- -- MCHMatthews China Active ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is COWZ ETF a Good Investment?
There’s a reason even Warren Buffett advocates his heirs to…
3 Stocks Buffett Is Betting On
Warren Buffett appeared to take a hard look at the…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Sell
44
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 110x
Sell
40
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
72
HEES alert for Jan 15
H&E Equipment Services [HEES] is up 105.42% over the past day.
Sell
26
SIG alert for Jan 15
Signet Jewelers [SIG] is down 21.66% over the past day.
Sell
45
WGS alert for Jan 15
GeneDx Holdings [WGS] is down 15.3% over the past day.
