X Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum has a net margin of -3.11% compared to United States Steel's net margin of 4.69%. United States Steel's return on equity of 0.85% beat Century Aluminum's return on equity of 18.99%.

United States Steel has a consensus price target of $43.51, signalling downside risk potential of -17.73%. On the other hand Century Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $22.67 which suggests that it could grow by 38.55%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than United States Steel, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than United States Steel.

United States Steel has a beta of 1.816, which suggesting that the stock is 81.63% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.697, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 169.68%.

United States Steel has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.39%. Century Aluminum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United States Steel pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

United States Steel quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Century Aluminum quarterly revenues of $633.9M. United States Steel's net income of -$116M is lower than Century Aluminum's net income of $29.7M. Notably, United States Steel's price-to-earnings ratio is 179.34x while Century Aluminum's PE ratio is 14.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United States Steel is 0.84x versus 0.67x for Century Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of -3.11% compared to United States Steel's net margin of -10.69%. United States Steel's return on equity of 0.85% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -16.75%.

United States Steel has a consensus price target of $43.51, signalling downside risk potential of -17.73%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $9.59 which suggests that it could grow by 50.25%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than United States Steel, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than United States Steel.

United States Steel has a beta of 1.816, which suggesting that the stock is 81.63% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.452%.

United States Steel has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.39%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United States Steel pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

United States Steel quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.6B. United States Steel's net income of -$116M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$495M. Notably, United States Steel's price-to-earnings ratio is 179.34x while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United States Steel is 0.84x versus 0.16x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor has a net margin of -3.11% compared to United States Steel's net margin of 1.99%. United States Steel's return on equity of 0.85% beat Nucor's return on equity of 6.22%.

United States Steel has a consensus price target of $43.51, signalling downside risk potential of -17.73%. On the other hand Nucor has an analysts' consensus of $146.74 which suggests that it could grow by 35.25%. Given that Nucor has higher upside potential than United States Steel, analysts believe Nucor is more attractive than United States Steel.

United States Steel has a beta of 1.816, which suggesting that the stock is 81.63% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor has a beta of 1.733, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.341%.

United States Steel has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.39%. Nucor offers a yield of 2.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. United States Steel pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor pays out 25.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United States Steel quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than Nucor quarterly revenues of $7.8B. United States Steel's net income of -$116M is lower than Nucor's net income of $156M. Notably, United States Steel's price-to-earnings ratio is 179.34x while Nucor's PE ratio is 19.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United States Steel is 0.84x versus 0.84x for Nucor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of -3.11% compared to United States Steel's net margin of 4.97%. United States Steel's return on equity of 0.85% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 13%.

United States Steel has a consensus price target of $43.51, signalling downside risk potential of -17.73%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $146.84 which suggests that it could grow by 16.59%. Given that Steel Dynamics has higher upside potential than United States Steel, analysts believe Steel Dynamics is more attractive than United States Steel.

United States Steel has a beta of 1.816, which suggesting that the stock is 81.63% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.442, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.234%.

United States Steel has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.39%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. United States Steel pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United States Steel quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $4.4B. United States Steel's net income of -$116M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $217.2M. Notably, United States Steel's price-to-earnings ratio is 179.34x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 16.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United States Steel is 0.84x versus 1.12x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.