X Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of -3.11% compared to United States Steel's net margin of -10.69%. United States Steel's return on equity of 0.85% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -16.75%.

United States Steel has a consensus price target of $42.79, signalling upside risk potential of 3.31%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $10.71 which suggests that it could grow by 49.8%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than United States Steel, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than United States Steel.

United States Steel has a beta of 1.816, which suggesting that the stock is 81.63% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.452%.

United States Steel has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United States Steel pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

United States Steel quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.6B. United States Steel's net income of -$116M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$495M. Notably, United States Steel's price-to-earnings ratio is 142.83x while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United States Steel is 0.67x versus 0.18x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Commercial Metals has a net margin of -3.11% compared to United States Steel's net margin of 1.45%. United States Steel's return on equity of 0.85% beat Commercial Metals's return on equity of 1.76%.

United States Steel has a consensus price target of $42.79, signalling upside risk potential of 3.31%. On the other hand Commercial Metals has an analysts' consensus of $52.17 which suggests that it could grow by 13.04%. Given that Commercial Metals has higher upside potential than United States Steel, analysts believe Commercial Metals is more attractive than United States Steel.

United States Steel has a beta of 1.816, which suggesting that the stock is 81.63% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Metals has a beta of 1.292, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.238%.

United States Steel has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. Commercial Metals offers a yield of 1.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. United States Steel pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals pays out 16.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United States Steel quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Commercial Metals quarterly revenues of $1.8B. United States Steel's net income of -$116M is lower than Commercial Metals's net income of $25.5M. Notably, United States Steel's price-to-earnings ratio is 142.83x while Commercial Metals's PE ratio is 76.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United States Steel is 0.67x versus 0.69x for Commercial Metals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum has a net margin of -3.11% compared to United States Steel's net margin of 2.78%. United States Steel's return on equity of 0.85% beat Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 6.41%.

United States Steel has a consensus price target of $42.79, signalling upside risk potential of 3.31%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $69.00 which suggests that it could grow by 0.86%. Given that United States Steel has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe United States Steel is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

United States Steel has a beta of 1.816, which suggesting that the stock is 81.63% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.398, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.799%.

United States Steel has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. Kaiser Aluminum offers a yield of 4.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. United States Steel pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum pays out 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend.

United States Steel quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues of $777.4M. United States Steel's net income of -$116M is lower than Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $21.6M. Notably, United States Steel's price-to-earnings ratio is 142.83x while Kaiser Aluminum's PE ratio is 25.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United States Steel is 0.67x versus 0.37x for Kaiser Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of -3.11% compared to United States Steel's net margin of 4.97%. United States Steel's return on equity of 0.85% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 13%.

United States Steel has a consensus price target of $42.79, signalling upside risk potential of 3.31%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $146.11 which suggests that it could grow by 12.72%. Given that Steel Dynamics has higher upside potential than United States Steel, analysts believe Steel Dynamics is more attractive than United States Steel.

United States Steel has a beta of 1.816, which suggesting that the stock is 81.63% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.442, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.234%.

United States Steel has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. United States Steel pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United States Steel quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $4.4B. United States Steel's net income of -$116M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $217.2M. Notably, United States Steel's price-to-earnings ratio is 142.83x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 17.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United States Steel is 0.67x versus 1.16x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.