CLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum has a net margin of -10.69% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs's net margin of 4.69%. Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -16.75% beat Century Aluminum's return on equity of 18.99%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $9.69, signalling upside risk potential of 49.48%. On the other hand Century Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $22.67 which suggests that it could grow by 44.56%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Century Aluminum, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Century Aluminum.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.035, which suggesting that the stock is 103.452% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.697, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 169.68%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Century Aluminum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than Century Aluminum quarterly revenues of $633.9M. Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$495M is lower than Century Aluminum's net income of $29.7M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs's price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Century Aluminum's PE ratio is 13.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs is 0.17x versus 0.64x for Century Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor has a net margin of -10.69% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs's net margin of 1.99%. Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -16.75% beat Nucor's return on equity of 6.22%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $9.69, signalling upside risk potential of 49.48%. On the other hand Nucor has an analysts' consensus of $146.74 which suggests that it could grow by 35.25%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Nucor, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Nucor.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.035, which suggesting that the stock is 103.452% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor has a beta of 1.733, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.341%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nucor offers a yield of 2.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor pays out 25.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are smaller than Nucor quarterly revenues of $7.8B. Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$495M is lower than Nucor's net income of $156M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs's price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Nucor's PE ratio is 19.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs is 0.17x versus 0.84x for Nucor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of -10.69% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs's net margin of 4.97%. Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -16.75% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 13%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $9.69, signalling upside risk potential of 49.48%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $146.84 which suggests that it could grow by 16.59%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Steel Dynamics.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.035, which suggesting that the stock is 103.452% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.442, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.234%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$495M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $217.2M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs's price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 16.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs is 0.17x versus 1.12x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United States Steel has a net margin of -10.69% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs's net margin of -3.11%. Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -16.75% beat United States Steel's return on equity of 0.85%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $9.69, signalling upside risk potential of 49.48%. On the other hand United States Steel has an analysts' consensus of $43.51 which suggests that it could fall by -17.73%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than United States Steel, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than United States Steel.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.035, which suggesting that the stock is 103.452% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United States Steel has a beta of 1.816, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.63%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. United States Steel offers a yield of 0.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. United States Steel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than United States Steel quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$495M is lower than United States Steel's net income of -$116M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs's price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while United States Steel's PE ratio is 179.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs is 0.17x versus 0.84x for United States Steel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.