STLD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Commercial Metals has a net margin of 5.35% compared to Steel Dynamics's net margin of 1.45%. Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 17.07% beat Commercial Metals's return on equity of 1.76%.

Steel Dynamics has a consensus price target of $146.24, signalling upside risk potential of 21.45%. On the other hand Commercial Metals has an analysts' consensus of $53.87 which suggests that it could grow by 28.61%. Given that Commercial Metals has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, analysts believe Commercial Metals is more attractive than Steel Dynamics.

Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.347, which suggesting that the stock is 34.654% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Metals has a beta of 1.164, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.354%.

Steel Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.56%. Commercial Metals offers a yield of 1.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Steel Dynamics pays 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals pays out 16.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Commercial Metals quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Steel Dynamics's net income of $207.3M is higher than Commercial Metals's net income of $25.5M. Notably, Steel Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.29x while Commercial Metals's PE ratio is 69.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steel Dynamics is 1.07x versus 0.62x for Commercial Metals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum has a net margin of 5.35% compared to Steel Dynamics's net margin of 0.93%. Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 17.07% beat Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.06%.

Steel Dynamics has a consensus price target of $146.24, signalling upside risk potential of 21.45%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $89.00 which suggests that it could grow by 60.36%. Given that Kaiser Aluminum has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, analysts believe Kaiser Aluminum is more attractive than Steel Dynamics.

Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.347, which suggesting that the stock is 34.654% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.319, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.862%.

Steel Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.56%. Kaiser Aluminum offers a yield of 5.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Steel Dynamics pays 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum pays out 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kaiser Aluminum's is not.

Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues of $765.4M. Steel Dynamics's net income of $207.3M is higher than Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $7.1M. Notably, Steel Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.29x while Kaiser Aluminum's PE ratio is 19.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steel Dynamics is 1.07x versus 0.30x for Kaiser Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor has a net margin of 5.35% compared to Steel Dynamics's net margin of 4.06%. Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 17.07% beat Nucor's return on equity of 9.33%.

Steel Dynamics has a consensus price target of $146.24, signalling upside risk potential of 21.45%. On the other hand Nucor has an analysts' consensus of $150.82 which suggests that it could grow by 35.58%. Given that Nucor has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, analysts believe Nucor is more attractive than Steel Dynamics.

Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.347, which suggesting that the stock is 34.654% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor has a beta of 1.666, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.625%.

Steel Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.56%. Nucor offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Steel Dynamics pays 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor pays out 25.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are smaller than Nucor quarterly revenues of $7.1B. Steel Dynamics's net income of $207.3M is lower than Nucor's net income of $287M. Notably, Steel Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.29x while Nucor's PE ratio is 13.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steel Dynamics is 1.07x versus 0.86x for Nucor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reliance has a net margin of 5.35% compared to Steel Dynamics's net margin of 3.37%. Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 17.07% beat Reliance's return on equity of 11.55%.

Steel Dynamics has a consensus price target of $146.24, signalling upside risk potential of 21.45%. On the other hand Reliance has an analysts' consensus of $328.03 which suggests that it could grow by 17.34%. Given that Steel Dynamics has higher upside potential than Reliance, analysts believe Steel Dynamics is more attractive than Reliance.

Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.347, which suggesting that the stock is 34.654% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reliance has a beta of 0.826, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.391%.

Steel Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.56%. Reliance offers a yield of 1.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Steel Dynamics pays 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Reliance pays out 28.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Reliance quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Steel Dynamics's net income of $207.3M is higher than Reliance's net income of $105.3M. Notably, Steel Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.29x while Reliance's PE ratio is 18.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steel Dynamics is 1.07x versus 1.14x for Reliance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.