TNL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a net margin of 12.26% compared to Travel+Leisure's net margin of 12.07%. Travel+Leisure's return on equity of -- beat Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's return on equity of 116.2%.

Travel+Leisure has a consensus price target of $64.83, signalling upside risk potential of 55.89%. On the other hand Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $29.68 which suggests that it could grow by 81.89%. Given that Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has higher upside potential than Travel+Leisure, analysts believe Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings is more attractive than Travel+Leisure.

Travel+Leisure has a beta of 1.408, which suggesting that the stock is 40.754% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a beta of 2.266, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 126.614%.

Travel+Leisure has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.95%. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Travel+Leisure pays 34.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Travel+Leisure's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Travel+Leisure quarterly revenues are $971M, which are smaller than Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Travel+Leisure's net income of $119M is lower than Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's net income of $254.5M. Notably, Travel+Leisure's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.12x while Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's PE ratio is 8.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Travel+Leisure is 0.76x versus 0.85x for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Eightco Holdings has a net margin of 12.26% compared to Travel+Leisure's net margin of -41.41%. Travel+Leisure's return on equity of -- beat Eightco Holdings's return on equity of -52.91%.

Travel+Leisure has a consensus price target of $64.83, signalling upside risk potential of 55.89%. On the other hand Eightco Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Travel+Leisure has higher upside potential than Eightco Holdings, analysts believe Travel+Leisure is more attractive than Eightco Holdings.

Travel+Leisure has a beta of 1.408, which suggesting that the stock is 40.754% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eightco Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Travel+Leisure has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.95%. Eightco Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Travel+Leisure pays 34.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Eightco Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Travel+Leisure's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Travel+Leisure quarterly revenues are $971M, which are larger than Eightco Holdings quarterly revenues of $7.7M. Travel+Leisure's net income of $119M is higher than Eightco Holdings's net income of -$3.2M. Notably, Travel+Leisure's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.12x while Eightco Holdings's PE ratio is 0.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Travel+Leisure is 0.76x versus 0.04x for Eightco Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ranpak Holdings has a net margin of 12.26% compared to Travel+Leisure's net margin of -10.29%. Travel+Leisure's return on equity of -- beat Ranpak Holdings's return on equity of -3.83%.

Travel+Leisure has a consensus price target of $64.83, signalling upside risk potential of 55.89%. On the other hand Ranpak Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $11.17 which suggests that it could grow by 197.78%. Given that Ranpak Holdings has higher upside potential than Travel+Leisure, analysts believe Ranpak Holdings is more attractive than Travel+Leisure.

Travel+Leisure has a beta of 1.408, which suggesting that the stock is 40.754% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ranpak Holdings has a beta of 2.697, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 169.676%.

Travel+Leisure has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.95%. Ranpak Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Travel+Leisure pays 34.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Ranpak Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Travel+Leisure's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Travel+Leisure quarterly revenues are $971M, which are larger than Ranpak Holdings quarterly revenues of $105M. Travel+Leisure's net income of $119M is higher than Ranpak Holdings's net income of -$10.8M. Notably, Travel+Leisure's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.12x while Ranpak Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Travel+Leisure is 0.76x versus 0.84x for Ranpak Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Royal Caribbean Group has a net margin of 12.26% compared to Travel+Leisure's net margin of 14.68%. Travel+Leisure's return on equity of -- beat Royal Caribbean Group's return on equity of 45.86%.

Travel+Leisure has a consensus price target of $64.83, signalling upside risk potential of 55.89%. On the other hand Royal Caribbean Group has an analysts' consensus of $273.94 which suggests that it could grow by 42.67%. Given that Travel+Leisure has higher upside potential than Royal Caribbean Group, analysts believe Travel+Leisure is more attractive than Royal Caribbean Group.

Travel+Leisure has a beta of 1.408, which suggesting that the stock is 40.754% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Royal Caribbean Group has a beta of 2.265, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 126.491%.

Travel+Leisure has a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.95%. Royal Caribbean Group offers a yield of 0.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Travel+Leisure pays 34.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Royal Caribbean Group pays out 3.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Travel+Leisure quarterly revenues are $971M, which are smaller than Royal Caribbean Group quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Travel+Leisure's net income of $119M is lower than Royal Caribbean Group's net income of $552M. Notably, Travel+Leisure's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.12x while Royal Caribbean Group's PE ratio is 17.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Travel+Leisure is 0.76x versus 3.21x for Royal Caribbean Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.