NCLH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Carnival PLC has a net margin of 16.92% compared to Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's net margin of 5.1%. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's return on equity of 93.73% beat Carnival PLC's return on equity of 25.06%.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a consensus price target of $30.60, signalling upside risk potential of 17.12%. On the other hand Carnival PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 20.02%. Given that Carnival PLC has higher upside potential than Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings, analysts believe Carnival PLC is more attractive than Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a beta of 2.655, which suggesting that the stock is 165.512% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Carnival PLC has a beta of 2.720, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 172.009%.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Carnival PLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Carnival PLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than Carnival PLC quarterly revenues of $5.9B. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's net income of $474.9M is higher than Carnival PLC's net income of $303M. Notably, Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.97x while Carnival PLC's PE ratio is 16.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings is 1.32x versus 1.24x for Carnival PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Eightco Holdings has a net margin of 16.92% compared to Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's net margin of -41.41%. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's return on equity of 93.73% beat Eightco Holdings's return on equity of -52.91%.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a consensus price target of $30.60, signalling upside risk potential of 17.12%. On the other hand Eightco Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has higher upside potential than Eightco Holdings, analysts believe Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings is more attractive than Eightco Holdings.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a beta of 2.655, which suggesting that the stock is 165.512% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eightco Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Eightco Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eightco Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Eightco Holdings quarterly revenues of $7.7M. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's net income of $474.9M is higher than Eightco Holdings's net income of -$3.2M. Notably, Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.97x while Eightco Holdings's PE ratio is 0.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings is 1.32x versus 0.06x for Eightco Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Royal Caribbean Group has a net margin of 16.92% compared to Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's net margin of 22.74%. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's return on equity of 93.73% beat Royal Caribbean Group's return on equity of 46.09%.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a consensus price target of $30.60, signalling upside risk potential of 17.12%. On the other hand Royal Caribbean Group has an analysts' consensus of $247.66 which suggests that it could grow by 4.12%. Given that Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has higher upside potential than Royal Caribbean Group, analysts believe Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings is more attractive than Royal Caribbean Group.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a beta of 2.655, which suggesting that the stock is 165.512% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Royal Caribbean Group has a beta of 2.599, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 159.928%.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Royal Caribbean Group offers a yield of 0.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Royal Caribbean Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than Royal Caribbean Group quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's net income of $474.9M is lower than Royal Caribbean Group's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.97x while Royal Caribbean Group's PE ratio is 24.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings is 1.32x versus 4.10x for Royal Caribbean Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Travel+Leisure has a net margin of 16.92% compared to Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's net margin of 9.77%. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's return on equity of 93.73% beat Travel+Leisure's return on equity of --.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a consensus price target of $30.60, signalling upside risk potential of 17.12%. On the other hand Travel+Leisure has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.25%. Given that Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has higher upside potential than Travel+Leisure, analysts believe Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings is more attractive than Travel+Leisure.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a beta of 2.655, which suggesting that the stock is 165.512% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Travel+Leisure has a beta of 1.640, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.045%.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Travel+Leisure offers a yield of 3.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Travel+Leisure pays out 34.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Travel+Leisure's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Travel+Leisure quarterly revenues of $993M. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's net income of $474.9M is higher than Travel+Leisure's net income of $97M. Notably, Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.97x while Travel+Leisure's PE ratio is 8.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings is 1.32x versus 0.94x for Travel+Leisure. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.