PACK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Greif has a net margin of -10.29% compared to Ranpak Holdings's net margin of 0.68%. Ranpak Holdings's return on equity of -3.83% beat Greif's return on equity of 9.54%.

Ranpak Holdings has a consensus price target of $11.17, signalling upside risk potential of 200.18%. On the other hand Greif has an analysts' consensus of $71.40 which suggests that it could grow by 36.23%. Given that Ranpak Holdings has higher upside potential than Greif, analysts believe Ranpak Holdings is more attractive than Greif.

Ranpak Holdings has a beta of 2.697, which suggesting that the stock is 169.676% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greif has a beta of 0.909, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.101%.

Ranpak Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Greif offers a yield of 4.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share. Ranpak Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Greif pays out 45.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Greif's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ranpak Holdings quarterly revenues are $105M, which are smaller than Greif quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Ranpak Holdings's net income of -$10.8M is lower than Greif's net income of $8.6M. Notably, Ranpak Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Greif's PE ratio is 14.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ranpak Holdings is 0.84x versus 0.53x for Greif. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Eightco Holdings has a net margin of -10.29% compared to Ranpak Holdings's net margin of -41.41%. Ranpak Holdings's return on equity of -3.83% beat Eightco Holdings's return on equity of -52.91%.

Ranpak Holdings has a consensus price target of $11.17, signalling upside risk potential of 200.18%. On the other hand Eightco Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ranpak Holdings has higher upside potential than Eightco Holdings, analysts believe Ranpak Holdings is more attractive than Eightco Holdings.

Ranpak Holdings has a beta of 2.697, which suggesting that the stock is 169.676% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eightco Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ranpak Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Eightco Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ranpak Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eightco Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ranpak Holdings quarterly revenues are $105M, which are larger than Eightco Holdings quarterly revenues of $7.7M. Ranpak Holdings's net income of -$10.8M is lower than Eightco Holdings's net income of -$3.2M. Notably, Ranpak Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Eightco Holdings's PE ratio is 17.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ranpak Holdings is 0.84x versus 0.05x for Eightco Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Royal Caribbean Group has a net margin of -10.29% compared to Ranpak Holdings's net margin of 14.68%. Ranpak Holdings's return on equity of -3.83% beat Royal Caribbean Group's return on equity of 45.86%.

Ranpak Holdings has a consensus price target of $11.17, signalling upside risk potential of 200.18%. On the other hand Royal Caribbean Group has an analysts' consensus of $265.39 which suggests that it could grow by 34.17%. Given that Ranpak Holdings has higher upside potential than Royal Caribbean Group, analysts believe Ranpak Holdings is more attractive than Royal Caribbean Group.

Ranpak Holdings has a beta of 2.697, which suggesting that the stock is 169.676% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Royal Caribbean Group has a beta of 2.265, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 126.491%.

Ranpak Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Royal Caribbean Group offers a yield of 0.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Ranpak Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Royal Caribbean Group pays out 3.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Royal Caribbean Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ranpak Holdings quarterly revenues are $105M, which are smaller than Royal Caribbean Group quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Ranpak Holdings's net income of -$10.8M is lower than Royal Caribbean Group's net income of $552M. Notably, Ranpak Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Royal Caribbean Group's PE ratio is 18.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ranpak Holdings is 0.84x versus 3.34x for Royal Caribbean Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Travel+Leisure has a net margin of -10.29% compared to Ranpak Holdings's net margin of 12.26%. Ranpak Holdings's return on equity of -3.83% beat Travel+Leisure's return on equity of --.

Ranpak Holdings has a consensus price target of $11.17, signalling upside risk potential of 200.18%. On the other hand Travel+Leisure has an analysts' consensus of $62.33 which suggests that it could grow by 46.77%. Given that Ranpak Holdings has higher upside potential than Travel+Leisure, analysts believe Ranpak Holdings is more attractive than Travel+Leisure.

Ranpak Holdings has a beta of 2.697, which suggesting that the stock is 169.676% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Travel+Leisure has a beta of 1.408, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.754%.

Ranpak Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Travel+Leisure offers a yield of 4.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. Ranpak Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Travel+Leisure pays out 34.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Travel+Leisure's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ranpak Holdings quarterly revenues are $105M, which are smaller than Travel+Leisure quarterly revenues of $971M. Ranpak Holdings's net income of -$10.8M is lower than Travel+Leisure's net income of $119M. Notably, Ranpak Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Travel+Leisure's PE ratio is 7.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ranpak Holdings is 0.84x versus 0.78x for Travel+Leisure. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.