GEF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bassett Furniture Industries has a net margin of 0.68% compared to Greif's net margin of 2.26%. Greif's return on equity of 9.54% beat Bassett Furniture Industries's return on equity of -3.9%.

Greif has a consensus price target of $71.40, signalling upside risk potential of 31.44%. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1.82%. Given that Greif has higher upside potential than Bassett Furniture Industries, analysts believe Greif is more attractive than Bassett Furniture Industries.

Greif has a beta of 0.940, which suggesting that the stock is 5.977% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries has a beta of 1.259, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.912%.

Greif has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.94%. Bassett Furniture Industries offers a yield of 4.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Greif pays 45.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries pays out -68.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Greif's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Greif quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Bassett Furniture Industries quarterly revenues of $82.2M. Greif's net income of $8.6M is higher than Bassett Furniture Industries's net income of $1.9M. Notably, Greif's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.52x while Bassett Furniture Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greif is 0.55x versus 0.50x for Bassett Furniture Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 0.68% compared to Greif's net margin of --. Greif's return on equity of 9.54% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Greif has a consensus price target of $71.40, signalling upside risk potential of 31.44%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 23.46%. Given that Greif has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe Greif is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

Greif has a beta of 0.940, which suggesting that the stock is 5.977% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.762, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 176.173%.

Greif has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.94%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greif pays 45.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Greif's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Greif quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Greif's net income of $8.6M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Greif's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.52x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greif is 0.55x versus 146.44x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann has a net margin of 0.68% compared to Greif's net margin of --. Greif's return on equity of 9.54% beat Northann's return on equity of --.

Greif has a consensus price target of $71.40, signalling upside risk potential of 31.44%. On the other hand Northann has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Greif has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe Greif is more attractive than Northann.

Greif has a beta of 0.940, which suggesting that the stock is 5.977% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Greif has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.94%. Northann offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greif pays 45.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Northann pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Greif's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Greif quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Northann quarterly revenues of --. Greif's net income of $8.6M is higher than Northann's net income of --. Notably, Greif's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.52x while Northann's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greif is 0.55x versus 0.69x for Northann. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ranpak Holdings has a net margin of 0.68% compared to Greif's net margin of -10.29%. Greif's return on equity of 9.54% beat Ranpak Holdings's return on equity of -3.83%.

Greif has a consensus price target of $71.40, signalling upside risk potential of 31.44%. On the other hand Ranpak Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $11.17 which suggests that it could grow by 152.64%. Given that Ranpak Holdings has higher upside potential than Greif, analysts believe Ranpak Holdings is more attractive than Greif.

Greif has a beta of 0.940, which suggesting that the stock is 5.977% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ranpak Holdings has a beta of 2.791, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 179.059%.

Greif has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.94%. Ranpak Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greif pays 45.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Ranpak Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Greif's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Greif quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Ranpak Holdings quarterly revenues of $105M. Greif's net income of $8.6M is higher than Ranpak Holdings's net income of -$10.8M. Notably, Greif's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.52x while Ranpak Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greif is 0.55x versus 1.00x for Ranpak Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.