PUMP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Baker Hughes has a net margin of 2.67% compared to ProPetro Holding's net margin of 6.26%. ProPetro Holding's return on equity of -16.65% beat Baker Hughes's return on equity of 17.87%.

ProPetro Holding has a consensus price target of $8.94, signalling upside risk potential of 64.42%. On the other hand Baker Hughes has an analysts' consensus of $47.13 which suggests that it could grow by 29.17%. Given that ProPetro Holding has higher upside potential than Baker Hughes, analysts believe ProPetro Holding is more attractive than Baker Hughes.

ProPetro Holding has a beta of 1.194, which suggesting that the stock is 19.404% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baker Hughes has a beta of 0.959, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.121%.

ProPetro Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Baker Hughes offers a yield of 2.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. ProPetro Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Baker Hughes pays out 28.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Baker Hughes's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ProPetro Holding quarterly revenues are $359.4M, which are smaller than Baker Hughes quarterly revenues of $6.4B. ProPetro Holding's net income of $9.6M is lower than Baker Hughes's net income of $402M. Notably, ProPetro Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.47x while Baker Hughes's PE ratio is 12.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProPetro Holding is 0.41x versus 1.31x for Baker Hughes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLX Energy Services Holdings has a net margin of 2.67% compared to ProPetro Holding's net margin of -8.82%. ProPetro Holding's return on equity of -16.65% beat KLX Energy Services Holdings's return on equity of -460.87%.

ProPetro Holding has a consensus price target of $8.94, signalling upside risk potential of 64.42%. On the other hand KLX Energy Services Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $8.00 which suggests that it could grow by 314.51%. Given that KLX Energy Services Holdings has higher upside potential than ProPetro Holding, analysts believe KLX Energy Services Holdings is more attractive than ProPetro Holding.

ProPetro Holding has a beta of 1.194, which suggesting that the stock is 19.404% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLX Energy Services Holdings has a beta of 1.086, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.617%.

ProPetro Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KLX Energy Services Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ProPetro Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KLX Energy Services Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ProPetro Holding quarterly revenues are $359.4M, which are larger than KLX Energy Services Holdings quarterly revenues of $165.5M. ProPetro Holding's net income of $9.6M is higher than KLX Energy Services Holdings's net income of -$14.6M. Notably, ProPetro Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.47x while KLX Energy Services Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProPetro Holding is 0.41x versus 0.04x for KLX Energy Services Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NextDecade has a net margin of 2.67% compared to ProPetro Holding's net margin of --. ProPetro Holding's return on equity of -16.65% beat NextDecade's return on equity of --.

ProPetro Holding has a consensus price target of $8.94, signalling upside risk potential of 64.42%. On the other hand NextDecade has an analysts' consensus of $9.50 which suggests that it could grow by 23.86%. Given that ProPetro Holding has higher upside potential than NextDecade, analysts believe ProPetro Holding is more attractive than NextDecade.

ProPetro Holding has a beta of 1.194, which suggesting that the stock is 19.404% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NextDecade has a beta of 1.053, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.287%.

ProPetro Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NextDecade offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ProPetro Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NextDecade pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ProPetro Holding quarterly revenues are $359.4M, which are larger than NextDecade quarterly revenues of --. ProPetro Holding's net income of $9.6M is higher than NextDecade's net income of -$88.8M. Notably, ProPetro Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.47x while NextDecade's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProPetro Holding is 0.41x versus -- for NextDecade. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Schlumberger has a net margin of 2.67% compared to ProPetro Holding's net margin of 9.39%. ProPetro Holding's return on equity of -16.65% beat Schlumberger's return on equity of 19.04%.

ProPetro Holding has a consensus price target of $8.94, signalling upside risk potential of 64.42%. On the other hand Schlumberger has an analysts' consensus of $47.74 which suggests that it could grow by 38.17%. Given that ProPetro Holding has higher upside potential than Schlumberger, analysts believe ProPetro Holding is more attractive than Schlumberger.

ProPetro Holding has a beta of 1.194, which suggesting that the stock is 19.404% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schlumberger has a beta of 1.056, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.627%.

ProPetro Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Schlumberger offers a yield of 3.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. ProPetro Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Schlumberger pays out 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Schlumberger's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ProPetro Holding quarterly revenues are $359.4M, which are smaller than Schlumberger quarterly revenues of $8.5B. ProPetro Holding's net income of $9.6M is lower than Schlumberger's net income of $797M. Notably, ProPetro Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.47x while Schlumberger's PE ratio is 11.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProPetro Holding is 0.41x versus 1.36x for Schlumberger. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.