Financhill
Sell
34

PUMP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$5.52
Seasonality move :
-11.13%
Day range:
$5.43 - $5.74
52-week range:
$4.61 - $11.17
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
26.47x
P/S ratio:
0.41x
P/B ratio:
0.69x
Volume:
1.1M
Avg. volume:
1.8M
1-year change:
-44.5%
Market cap:
$566.3M
Revenue:
$1.4B
EPS (TTM):
-$1.43

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
PUMP
ProPetro Holding
$344.3M $0.06 -7.24% -69.39% $8.72
ACDC
ProFrac Holding
$495.7M -$0.33 -10.12% -50.82% $6.30
BKR
Baker Hughes
$6.5B $0.47 -6.79% -4.26% $46.63
KLXE
KLX Energy Services Holdings
$160.8M -$0.86 -9.27% -26.53% $5.00
NEXT
NextDecade
-- -$0.07 -- -92.86% $9.50
SLB
Schlumberger
$8.6B $0.73 -6.87% -1.17% $47.50
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
PUMP
ProPetro Holding
$5.45 $8.72 $566.3M 26.47x $0.00 0% 0.41x
ACDC
ProFrac Holding
$7.23 $6.30 $1.2B 8.77x $0.00 0% 0.52x
BKR
Baker Hughes
$36.68 $46.63 $36.3B 12.52x $0.23 2.4% 1.32x
KLXE
KLX Energy Services Holdings
$1.85 $5.00 $32.5M -- $0.00 0% 0.04x
NEXT
NextDecade
$7.68 $9.50 $2B -- $0.00 0% --
SLB
Schlumberger
$33.58 $47.50 $45.4B 11.38x $0.29 3.31% 1.32x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
PUMP
ProPetro Holding
5.16% 1.813 5.9% 1.31x
ACDC
ProFrac Holding
53.28% 3.280 87.56% 0.64x
BKR
Baker Hughes
26.12% 1.511 13.79% 0.79x
KLXE
KLX Energy Services Holdings
111.35% 3.666 423.7% 1.05x
NEXT
NextDecade
-- 1.089 -- --
SLB
Schlumberger
41.78% 0.897 24.8% 0.83x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
PUMP
ProPetro Holding
$46.9M $19.2M -15.85% -16.65% 3.46% $13.8M
ACDC
ProFrac Holding
$74.9M $21.3M -10.24% -20.25% 3.47% -$13.8M
BKR
Baker Hughes
$1.5B $752M 13.08% 17.87% 9.52% $409M
KLXE
KLX Energy Services Holdings
$30.2M -$16.5M -21.07% -460.87% -11.3% -$52.6M
NEXT
NextDecade
-$3.1M -$51.9M -- -- -- -$838.8M
SLB
Schlumberger
$1.6B $1.3B 12.01% 19.04% 14.25% $211M

ProPetro Holding vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns PUMP or ACDC?

    ProFrac Holding has a net margin of 2.67% compared to ProPetro Holding's net margin of -2.92%. ProPetro Holding's return on equity of -16.65% beat ProFrac Holding's return on equity of -20.25%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    13.04% $0.09 $871.5M
    ACDC
    ProFrac Holding
    12.48% -$0.12 $2.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About PUMP or ACDC?

    ProPetro Holding has a consensus price target of $8.72, signalling upside risk potential of 60.04%. On the other hand ProFrac Holding has an analysts' consensus of $6.30 which suggests that it could fall by -12.86%. Given that ProPetro Holding has higher upside potential than ProFrac Holding, analysts believe ProPetro Holding is more attractive than ProFrac Holding.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    3 4 0
    ACDC
    ProFrac Holding
    0 4 1
  • Is PUMP or ACDC More Risky?

    ProPetro Holding has a beta of 1.194, which suggesting that the stock is 19.404% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProFrac Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PUMP or ACDC?

    ProPetro Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ProFrac Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ProPetro Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProFrac Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PUMP or ACDC?

    ProPetro Holding quarterly revenues are $359.4M, which are smaller than ProFrac Holding quarterly revenues of $600.3M. ProPetro Holding's net income of $9.6M is higher than ProFrac Holding's net income of -$17.5M. Notably, ProPetro Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.47x while ProFrac Holding's PE ratio is 8.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProPetro Holding is 0.41x versus 0.52x for ProFrac Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    0.41x 26.47x $359.4M $9.6M
    ACDC
    ProFrac Holding
    0.52x 8.77x $600.3M -$17.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns PUMP or BKR?

    Baker Hughes has a net margin of 2.67% compared to ProPetro Holding's net margin of 6.26%. ProPetro Holding's return on equity of -16.65% beat Baker Hughes's return on equity of 17.87%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    13.04% $0.09 $871.5M
    BKR
    Baker Hughes
    22.95% $0.40 $23.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About PUMP or BKR?

    ProPetro Holding has a consensus price target of $8.72, signalling upside risk potential of 60.04%. On the other hand Baker Hughes has an analysts' consensus of $46.63 which suggests that it could grow by 27.13%. Given that ProPetro Holding has higher upside potential than Baker Hughes, analysts believe ProPetro Holding is more attractive than Baker Hughes.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    3 4 0
    BKR
    Baker Hughes
    12 5 0
  • Is PUMP or BKR More Risky?

    ProPetro Holding has a beta of 1.194, which suggesting that the stock is 19.404% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baker Hughes has a beta of 0.959, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.121%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PUMP or BKR?

    ProPetro Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Baker Hughes offers a yield of 2.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. ProPetro Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Baker Hughes pays out 28.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Baker Hughes's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PUMP or BKR?

    ProPetro Holding quarterly revenues are $359.4M, which are smaller than Baker Hughes quarterly revenues of $6.4B. ProPetro Holding's net income of $9.6M is lower than Baker Hughes's net income of $402M. Notably, ProPetro Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.47x while Baker Hughes's PE ratio is 12.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProPetro Holding is 0.41x versus 1.32x for Baker Hughes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    0.41x 26.47x $359.4M $9.6M
    BKR
    Baker Hughes
    1.32x 12.52x $6.4B $402M
  • Which has Higher Returns PUMP or KLXE?

    KLX Energy Services Holdings has a net margin of 2.67% compared to ProPetro Holding's net margin of -18.12%. ProPetro Holding's return on equity of -16.65% beat KLX Energy Services Holdings's return on equity of -460.87%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    13.04% $0.09 $871.5M
    KLXE
    KLX Energy Services Holdings
    19.61% -$1.62 $234.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About PUMP or KLXE?

    ProPetro Holding has a consensus price target of $8.72, signalling upside risk potential of 60.04%. On the other hand KLX Energy Services Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 170.27%. Given that KLX Energy Services Holdings has higher upside potential than ProPetro Holding, analysts believe KLX Energy Services Holdings is more attractive than ProPetro Holding.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    3 4 0
    KLXE
    KLX Energy Services Holdings
    0 0 0
  • Is PUMP or KLXE More Risky?

    ProPetro Holding has a beta of 1.194, which suggesting that the stock is 19.404% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLX Energy Services Holdings has a beta of 1.086, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.617%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PUMP or KLXE?

    ProPetro Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KLX Energy Services Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ProPetro Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KLX Energy Services Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PUMP or KLXE?

    ProPetro Holding quarterly revenues are $359.4M, which are larger than KLX Energy Services Holdings quarterly revenues of $154M. ProPetro Holding's net income of $9.6M is higher than KLX Energy Services Holdings's net income of -$27.9M. Notably, ProPetro Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.47x while KLX Energy Services Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProPetro Holding is 0.41x versus 0.04x for KLX Energy Services Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    0.41x 26.47x $359.4M $9.6M
    KLXE
    KLX Energy Services Holdings
    0.04x -- $154M -$27.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns PUMP or NEXT?

    NextDecade has a net margin of 2.67% compared to ProPetro Holding's net margin of --. ProPetro Holding's return on equity of -16.65% beat NextDecade's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    13.04% $0.09 $871.5M
    NEXT
    NextDecade
    -- -$0.34 --
  • What do Analysts Say About PUMP or NEXT?

    ProPetro Holding has a consensus price target of $8.72, signalling upside risk potential of 60.04%. On the other hand NextDecade has an analysts' consensus of $9.50 which suggests that it could grow by 23.7%. Given that ProPetro Holding has higher upside potential than NextDecade, analysts believe ProPetro Holding is more attractive than NextDecade.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    3 4 0
    NEXT
    NextDecade
    0 1 0
  • Is PUMP or NEXT More Risky?

    ProPetro Holding has a beta of 1.194, which suggesting that the stock is 19.404% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NextDecade has a beta of 1.053, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.287%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PUMP or NEXT?

    ProPetro Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NextDecade offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ProPetro Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NextDecade pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PUMP or NEXT?

    ProPetro Holding quarterly revenues are $359.4M, which are larger than NextDecade quarterly revenues of --. ProPetro Holding's net income of $9.6M is higher than NextDecade's net income of -$88.8M. Notably, ProPetro Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.47x while NextDecade's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProPetro Holding is 0.41x versus -- for NextDecade. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    0.41x 26.47x $359.4M $9.6M
    NEXT
    NextDecade
    -- -- -- -$88.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns PUMP or SLB?

    Schlumberger has a net margin of 2.67% compared to ProPetro Holding's net margin of 9.39%. ProPetro Holding's return on equity of -16.65% beat Schlumberger's return on equity of 19.04%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    13.04% $0.09 $871.5M
    SLB
    Schlumberger
    18.92% $0.58 $34.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About PUMP or SLB?

    ProPetro Holding has a consensus price target of $8.72, signalling upside risk potential of 60.04%. On the other hand Schlumberger has an analysts' consensus of $47.50 which suggests that it could grow by 41.45%. Given that ProPetro Holding has higher upside potential than Schlumberger, analysts believe ProPetro Holding is more attractive than Schlumberger.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    3 4 0
    SLB
    Schlumberger
    17 4 0
  • Is PUMP or SLB More Risky?

    ProPetro Holding has a beta of 1.194, which suggesting that the stock is 19.404% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schlumberger has a beta of 1.056, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.627%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PUMP or SLB?

    ProPetro Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Schlumberger offers a yield of 3.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. ProPetro Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Schlumberger pays out 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Schlumberger's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PUMP or SLB?

    ProPetro Holding quarterly revenues are $359.4M, which are smaller than Schlumberger quarterly revenues of $8.5B. ProPetro Holding's net income of $9.6M is lower than Schlumberger's net income of $797M. Notably, ProPetro Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.47x while Schlumberger's PE ratio is 11.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProPetro Holding is 0.41x versus 1.32x for Schlumberger. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding
    0.41x 26.47x $359.4M $9.6M
    SLB
    Schlumberger
    1.32x 11.38x $8.5B $797M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Microsoft Stock Outlook, Azure & AI as Drivers of Long-Term Growth
Microsoft Stock Outlook, Azure & AI as Drivers of Long-Term Growth

Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) has been among the top growth stocks of…

Is Tesla Stock Overvalued or a Buy for the Next Decade?
Is Tesla Stock Overvalued or a Buy for the Next Decade?

Shares of EV major Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) have experienced extreme volatility…

Is Apple Stock Undervalued or Overvalued?
Is Apple Stock Undervalued or Overvalued?

For many years, Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) was just about the perfect…

Stock Ideas

Buy
67
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Buy
68
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 46x

Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Alerts

Buy
80
SBET alert for May 29

SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is up 66.26% over the past day.

Buy
100
BOX alert for May 29

Box [BOX] is down 0.84% over the past day.

Sell
22
OKTA alert for May 29

Okta [OKTA] is up 1.5% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock