NOW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Palo Alto Networks has a net margin of 15.45% compared to ServiceNow's net margin of 16.4%. ServiceNow's return on equity of 16.34% beat Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 61.92%.

ServiceNow has a consensus price target of $1,071.37, signalling downside risk potential of -0.53%. On the other hand Palo Alto Networks has an analysts' consensus of $203.07 which suggests that it could grow by 13.13%. Given that Palo Alto Networks has higher upside potential than ServiceNow, analysts believe Palo Alto Networks is more attractive than ServiceNow.

ServiceNow has a beta of 0.986, which suggesting that the stock is 1.374% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.139, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.925%.

ServiceNow has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palo Alto Networks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ServiceNow pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palo Alto Networks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ServiceNow quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues of $2.1B. ServiceNow's net income of $432M is higher than Palo Alto Networks's net income of $350.7M. Notably, ServiceNow's price-to-earnings ratio is 167.50x while Palo Alto Networks's PE ratio is 46.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ServiceNow is 21.38x versus 15.38x for Palo Alto Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ePlus has a net margin of 15.45% compared to ServiceNow's net margin of 6.08%. ServiceNow's return on equity of 16.34% beat ePlus's return on equity of 12.01%.

ServiceNow has a consensus price target of $1,071.37, signalling downside risk potential of -0.53%. On the other hand ePlus has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 20.22%. Given that ePlus has higher upside potential than ServiceNow, analysts believe ePlus is more attractive than ServiceNow.

ServiceNow has a beta of 0.986, which suggesting that the stock is 1.374% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus has a beta of 1.095, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.534%.

ServiceNow has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ePlus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ServiceNow pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ServiceNow quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than ePlus quarterly revenues of $515.2M. ServiceNow's net income of $432M is higher than ePlus's net income of $31.3M. Notably, ServiceNow's price-to-earnings ratio is 167.50x while ePlus's PE ratio is 18.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ServiceNow is 21.38x versus 0.94x for ePlus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Violet has a net margin of 15.45% compared to ServiceNow's net margin of 9.02%. ServiceNow's return on equity of 16.34% beat Red Violet's return on equity of 5.77%.

ServiceNow has a consensus price target of $1,071.37, signalling downside risk potential of -0.53%. On the other hand Red Violet has an analysts' consensus of $25.00 which suggests that it could grow by 20.08%. Given that Red Violet has higher upside potential than ServiceNow, analysts believe Red Violet is more attractive than ServiceNow.

ServiceNow has a beta of 0.986, which suggesting that the stock is 1.374% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Violet has a beta of 1.483, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.283%.

ServiceNow has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Violet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ServiceNow pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Violet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ServiceNow quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Red Violet quarterly revenues of $19.1M. ServiceNow's net income of $432M is higher than Red Violet's net income of $1.7M. Notably, ServiceNow's price-to-earnings ratio is 167.50x while Red Violet's PE ratio is 99.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ServiceNow is 21.38x versus 7.16x for Red Violet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upland Software has a net margin of 15.45% compared to ServiceNow's net margin of -2.6%. ServiceNow's return on equity of 16.34% beat Upland Software's return on equity of -69.75%.

ServiceNow has a consensus price target of $1,071.37, signalling downside risk potential of -0.53%. On the other hand Upland Software has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -35.63%. Given that Upland Software has more downside risk than ServiceNow, analysts believe ServiceNow is more attractive than Upland Software.

ServiceNow has a beta of 0.986, which suggesting that the stock is 1.374% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upland Software has a beta of 1.275, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.538%.

ServiceNow has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Upland Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ServiceNow pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Upland Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ServiceNow quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Upland Software quarterly revenues of $66.7M. ServiceNow's net income of $432M is higher than Upland Software's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, ServiceNow's price-to-earnings ratio is 167.50x while Upland Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ServiceNow is 21.38x versus 0.49x for Upland Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.