NOW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Palo Alto Networks has a net margin of 12.99% compared to ServiceNow's net margin of 11.84%. ServiceNow's return on equity of 16.46% beat Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 23.87%.

ServiceNow has a consensus price target of $1,012.64, signalling upside risk potential of 32.06%. On the other hand Palo Alto Networks has an analysts' consensus of $211.90 which suggests that it could grow by 29.5%. Given that ServiceNow has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, analysts believe ServiceNow is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks.

ServiceNow has a beta of 1.080, which suggesting that the stock is 7.957% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.075, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.483%.

ServiceNow has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palo Alto Networks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ServiceNow pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palo Alto Networks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ServiceNow quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues of $2.3B. ServiceNow's net income of $384M is higher than Palo Alto Networks's net income of $267.3M. Notably, ServiceNow's price-to-earnings ratio is 112.27x while Palo Alto Networks's PE ratio is 92.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ServiceNow is 14.55x versus 13.53x for Palo Alto Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ePlus has a net margin of 12.99% compared to ServiceNow's net margin of 4.72%. ServiceNow's return on equity of 16.46% beat ePlus's return on equity of 11.36%.

ServiceNow has a consensus price target of $1,012.64, signalling upside risk potential of 32.06%. On the other hand ePlus has an analysts' consensus of $77.00 which suggests that it could grow by 28.12%. Given that ServiceNow has higher upside potential than ePlus, analysts believe ServiceNow is more attractive than ePlus.

ServiceNow has a beta of 1.080, which suggesting that the stock is 7.957% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus has a beta of 1.115, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.524%.

ServiceNow has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ePlus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ServiceNow pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ServiceNow quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than ePlus quarterly revenues of $511M. ServiceNow's net income of $384M is higher than ePlus's net income of $24.1M. Notably, ServiceNow's price-to-earnings ratio is 112.27x while ePlus's PE ratio is 15.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ServiceNow is 14.55x versus 0.76x for ePlus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Violet has a net margin of 12.99% compared to ServiceNow's net margin of 4.41%. ServiceNow's return on equity of 16.46% beat Red Violet's return on equity of 8.03%.

ServiceNow has a consensus price target of $1,012.64, signalling upside risk potential of 32.06%. On the other hand Red Violet has an analysts' consensus of $46.00 which suggests that it could grow by 25.44%. Given that ServiceNow has higher upside potential than Red Violet, analysts believe ServiceNow is more attractive than Red Violet.

ServiceNow has a beta of 1.080, which suggesting that the stock is 7.957% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Violet has a beta of 1.573, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.262%.

ServiceNow has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Violet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. ServiceNow pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Violet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ServiceNow quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than Red Violet quarterly revenues of $19.6M. ServiceNow's net income of $384M is higher than Red Violet's net income of $863K. Notably, ServiceNow's price-to-earnings ratio is 112.27x while Red Violet's PE ratio is 71.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ServiceNow is 14.55x versus 6.88x for Red Violet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upland Software has a net margin of 12.99% compared to ServiceNow's net margin of -5.04%. ServiceNow's return on equity of 16.46% beat Upland Software's return on equity of -76.42%.

ServiceNow has a consensus price target of $1,012.64, signalling upside risk potential of 32.06%. On the other hand Upland Software has an analysts' consensus of $4.25 which suggests that it could grow by 93.18%. Given that Upland Software has higher upside potential than ServiceNow, analysts believe Upland Software is more attractive than ServiceNow.

ServiceNow has a beta of 1.080, which suggesting that the stock is 7.957% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upland Software has a beta of 1.298, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.848%.

ServiceNow has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Upland Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ServiceNow pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Upland Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ServiceNow quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than Upland Software quarterly revenues of $68M. ServiceNow's net income of $384M is higher than Upland Software's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, ServiceNow's price-to-earnings ratio is 112.27x while Upland Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ServiceNow is 14.55x versus 0.22x for Upland Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.