PANW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ServiceNow has a net margin of 11.84% compared to Palo Alto Networks's net margin of 12.99%. Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 23.87% beat ServiceNow's return on equity of 16.46%.

Palo Alto Networks has a consensus price target of $211.90, signalling upside risk potential of 29.5%. On the other hand ServiceNow has an analysts' consensus of $1,012.64 which suggests that it could grow by 32.06%. Given that ServiceNow has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, analysts believe ServiceNow is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks.

Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.075, which suggesting that the stock is 7.483% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ServiceNow has a beta of 1.080, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.957%.

Palo Alto Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ServiceNow offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Palo Alto Networks pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ServiceNow pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are smaller than ServiceNow quarterly revenues of $3B. Palo Alto Networks's net income of $267.3M is lower than ServiceNow's net income of $384M. Notably, Palo Alto Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 92.19x while ServiceNow's PE ratio is 112.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palo Alto Networks is 13.53x versus 14.55x for ServiceNow. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ePlus has a net margin of 11.84% compared to Palo Alto Networks's net margin of 4.72%. Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 23.87% beat ePlus's return on equity of 11.36%.

Palo Alto Networks has a consensus price target of $211.90, signalling upside risk potential of 29.5%. On the other hand ePlus has an analysts' consensus of $77.00 which suggests that it could grow by 28.12%. Given that Palo Alto Networks has higher upside potential than ePlus, analysts believe Palo Alto Networks is more attractive than ePlus.

Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.075, which suggesting that the stock is 7.483% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus has a beta of 1.115, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.524%.

Palo Alto Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ePlus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Palo Alto Networks pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than ePlus quarterly revenues of $511M. Palo Alto Networks's net income of $267.3M is higher than ePlus's net income of $24.1M. Notably, Palo Alto Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 92.19x while ePlus's PE ratio is 15.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palo Alto Networks is 13.53x versus 0.76x for ePlus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tenable Holdings has a net margin of 11.84% compared to Palo Alto Networks's net margin of 0.79%. Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 23.87% beat Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -9.69%.

Palo Alto Networks has a consensus price target of $211.90, signalling upside risk potential of 29.5%. On the other hand Tenable Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $46.20 which suggests that it could grow by 50.37%. Given that Tenable Holdings has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, analysts believe Tenable Holdings is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks.

Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.075, which suggesting that the stock is 7.483% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.885, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.462%.

Palo Alto Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tenable Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Palo Alto Networks pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tenable Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues of $235.7M. Palo Alto Networks's net income of $267.3M is higher than Tenable Holdings's net income of $1.9M. Notably, Palo Alto Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 92.19x while Tenable Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palo Alto Networks is 13.53x versus 4.09x for Tenable Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upland Software has a net margin of 11.84% compared to Palo Alto Networks's net margin of -5.04%. Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 23.87% beat Upland Software's return on equity of -76.42%.

Palo Alto Networks has a consensus price target of $211.90, signalling upside risk potential of 29.5%. On the other hand Upland Software has an analysts' consensus of $4.25 which suggests that it could grow by 93.18%. Given that Upland Software has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, analysts believe Upland Software is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks.

Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.075, which suggesting that the stock is 7.483% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upland Software has a beta of 1.298, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.848%.

Palo Alto Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Upland Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Palo Alto Networks pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Upland Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Upland Software quarterly revenues of $68M. Palo Alto Networks's net income of $267.3M is higher than Upland Software's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, Palo Alto Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 92.19x while Upland Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palo Alto Networks is 13.53x versus 0.22x for Upland Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.