TENB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Palo Alto Networks has a net margin of -9.59% compared to Tenable Holdings's net margin of 11.84%. Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -11.74% beat Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 23.87%.

Tenable Holdings has a consensus price target of $37.05, signalling upside risk potential of 12.01%. On the other hand Palo Alto Networks has an analysts' consensus of $212.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.86%. Given that Tenable Holdings has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, analysts believe Tenable Holdings is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks.

Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.833, which suggesting that the stock is 16.678% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.025, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.467%.

Tenable Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palo Alto Networks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tenable Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palo Alto Networks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues are $239.1M, which are smaller than Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Tenable Holdings's net income of -$22.9M is lower than Palo Alto Networks's net income of $267.3M. Notably, Tenable Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Palo Alto Networks's PE ratio is 108.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tenable Holdings is 4.26x versus 15.96x for Palo Alto Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ePlus has a net margin of -9.59% compared to Tenable Holdings's net margin of 4.72%. Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -11.74% beat ePlus's return on equity of 11.36%.

Tenable Holdings has a consensus price target of $37.05, signalling upside risk potential of 12.01%. On the other hand ePlus has an analysts' consensus of $77.00 which suggests that it could grow by 14.69%. Given that ePlus has higher upside potential than Tenable Holdings, analysts believe ePlus is more attractive than Tenable Holdings.

Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.833, which suggesting that the stock is 16.678% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus has a beta of 1.121, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.143%.

Tenable Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ePlus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tenable Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues are $239.1M, which are smaller than ePlus quarterly revenues of $511M. Tenable Holdings's net income of -$22.9M is lower than ePlus's net income of $24.1M. Notably, Tenable Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ePlus's PE ratio is 17.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tenable Holdings is 4.26x versus 0.84x for ePlus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Violet has a net margin of -9.59% compared to Tenable Holdings's net margin of 15.63%. Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -11.74% beat Red Violet's return on equity of 9.8%.

Tenable Holdings has a consensus price target of $37.05, signalling upside risk potential of 12.01%. On the other hand Red Violet has an analysts' consensus of $52.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.69%. Given that Tenable Holdings has higher upside potential than Red Violet, analysts believe Tenable Holdings is more attractive than Red Violet.

Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.833, which suggesting that the stock is 16.678% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Violet has a beta of 1.692, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.18%.

Tenable Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Violet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Tenable Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Violet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues are $239.1M, which are larger than Red Violet quarterly revenues of $22M. Tenable Holdings's net income of -$22.9M is lower than Red Violet's net income of $3.4M. Notably, Tenable Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Red Violet's PE ratio is 79.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tenable Holdings is 4.26x versus 8.76x for Red Violet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upland Software has a net margin of -9.59% compared to Tenable Holdings's net margin of -40.61%. Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -11.74% beat Upland Software's return on equity of -36.56%.

Tenable Holdings has a consensus price target of $37.05, signalling upside risk potential of 12.01%. On the other hand Upland Software has an analysts' consensus of $4.25 which suggests that it could grow by 62.21%. Given that Upland Software has higher upside potential than Tenable Holdings, analysts believe Upland Software is more attractive than Tenable Holdings.

Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.833, which suggesting that the stock is 16.678% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upland Software has a beta of 1.269, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.856%.

Tenable Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Upland Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tenable Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Upland Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues are $239.1M, which are larger than Upland Software quarterly revenues of $63.7M. Tenable Holdings's net income of -$22.9M is higher than Upland Software's net income of -$25.8M. Notably, Tenable Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Upland Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tenable Holdings is 4.26x versus 0.27x for Upland Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.