MCY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cincinnati Financial has a net margin of -7.77% compared to Mercury General's net margin of -3.51%. Mercury General's return on equity of 16.11% beat Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 10.82%.

Mercury General has a consensus price target of $80.00, signalling upside risk potential of 33.85%. On the other hand Cincinnati Financial has an analysts' consensus of $152.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.23%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than Cincinnati Financial, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than Cincinnati Financial.

Mercury General has a beta of 0.905, which suggesting that the stock is 9.548% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.726, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.386%.

Mercury General has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.13%. Cincinnati Financial offers a yield of 2.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share. Mercury General pays 15.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial pays out 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercury General quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Mercury General's net income of -$108.3M is lower than Cincinnati Financial's net income of -$90M. Notably, Mercury General's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.58x while Cincinnati Financial's PE ratio is 15.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury General is 0.59x versus 2.09x for Cincinnati Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safety Insurance Group has a net margin of -7.77% compared to Mercury General's net margin of 7.31%. Mercury General's return on equity of 16.11% beat Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 8.75%.

Mercury General has a consensus price target of $80.00, signalling upside risk potential of 33.85%. On the other hand Safety Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -14.24%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than Safety Insurance Group, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than Safety Insurance Group.

Mercury General has a beta of 0.905, which suggesting that the stock is 9.548% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.218, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.16%.

Mercury General has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.13%. Safety Insurance Group offers a yield of 4.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Mercury General pays 15.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Safety Insurance Group pays out 75.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercury General quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Safety Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $299.6M. Mercury General's net income of -$108.3M is lower than Safety Insurance Group's net income of $21.9M. Notably, Mercury General's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.58x while Safety Insurance Group's PE ratio is 16.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury General is 0.59x versus 1.05x for Safety Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Selective Insurance Group has a net margin of -7.77% compared to Mercury General's net margin of 8.55%. Mercury General's return on equity of 16.11% beat Selective Insurance Group's return on equity of 7.57%.

Mercury General has a consensus price target of $80.00, signalling upside risk potential of 33.85%. On the other hand Selective Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $95.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.11%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than Selective Insurance Group, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than Selective Insurance Group.

Mercury General has a beta of 0.905, which suggesting that the stock is 9.548% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Selective Insurance Group has a beta of 0.509, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.059%.

Mercury General has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.13%. Selective Insurance Group offers a yield of 1.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Mercury General pays 15.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Selective Insurance Group pays out 45.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercury General quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Selective Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Mercury General's net income of -$108.3M is lower than Selective Insurance Group's net income of $109.9M. Notably, Mercury General's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.58x while Selective Insurance Group's PE ratio is 23.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury General is 0.59x versus 1.06x for Selective Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Fire Group has a net margin of -7.77% compared to Mercury General's net margin of 5.35%. Mercury General's return on equity of 16.11% beat United Fire Group's return on equity of 8.6%.

Mercury General has a consensus price target of $80.00, signalling upside risk potential of 33.85%. On the other hand United Fire Group has an analysts' consensus of $30.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.91%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than United Fire Group, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than United Fire Group.

Mercury General has a beta of 0.905, which suggesting that the stock is 9.548% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Fire Group has a beta of 0.488, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.206%.

Mercury General has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.13%. United Fire Group offers a yield of 2.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Mercury General pays 15.03% of its earnings as a dividend. United Fire Group pays out 26.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercury General quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than United Fire Group quarterly revenues of $331.1M. Mercury General's net income of -$108.3M is lower than United Fire Group's net income of $17.7M. Notably, Mercury General's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.58x while United Fire Group's PE ratio is 10.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury General is 0.59x versus 0.56x for United Fire Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.