MCY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American International Group has a net margin of 7.4% compared to Mercury General's net margin of 10.3%. Mercury General's return on equity of 27.18% beat American International Group's return on equity of -4.32%.

Mercury General has a consensus price target of $80.00, signalling upside risk potential of 35.66%. On the other hand American International Group has an analysts' consensus of $88.31 which suggests that it could grow by 7%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than American International Group, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than American International Group.

Mercury General has a beta of 0.905, which suggesting that the stock is 9.548% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American International Group has a beta of 0.688, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.175%.

Mercury General has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. American International Group offers a yield of 1.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Mercury General pays 15.03% of its earnings as a dividend. American International Group pays out -72.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury General's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercury General quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than American International Group quarterly revenues of $6.8B. Mercury General's net income of $101.1M is lower than American International Group's net income of $698M. Notably, Mercury General's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.98x while American International Group's PE ratio is 11.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury General is 0.60x versus 1.92x for American International Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Allstate has a net margin of 7.4% compared to Mercury General's net margin of 3.62%. Mercury General's return on equity of 27.18% beat Allstate's return on equity of 19.96%.

Mercury General has a consensus price target of $80.00, signalling upside risk potential of 35.66%. On the other hand Allstate has an analysts' consensus of $226.59 which suggests that it could grow by 12.14%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than Allstate, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than Allstate.

Mercury General has a beta of 0.905, which suggesting that the stock is 9.548% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allstate has a beta of 0.325, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.546%.

Mercury General has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. Allstate offers a yield of 1.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Mercury General pays 15.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate pays out 23.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercury General quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Allstate quarterly revenues of $16.5B. Mercury General's net income of $101.1M is lower than Allstate's net income of $595M. Notably, Mercury General's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.98x while Allstate's PE ratio is 13.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury General is 0.60x versus 0.83x for Allstate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progressive has a net margin of 7.4% compared to Mercury General's net margin of 12.58%. Mercury General's return on equity of 27.18% beat Progressive's return on equity of 34.35%.

Mercury General has a consensus price target of $80.00, signalling upside risk potential of 35.66%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $293.8824 which suggests that it could grow by 3.52%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than Progressive, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than Progressive.

Mercury General has a beta of 0.905, which suggesting that the stock is 9.548% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.403, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.748%.

Mercury General has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. Progressive offers a yield of 1.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Mercury General pays 15.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercury General quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $20.4B. Mercury General's net income of $101.1M is lower than Progressive's net income of $2.6B. Notably, Mercury General's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.98x while Progressive's PE ratio is 19.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury General is 0.60x versus 2.12x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Travelers Companies has a net margin of 7.4% compared to Mercury General's net margin of 3.35%. Mercury General's return on equity of 27.18% beat The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 15.98%.

Mercury General has a consensus price target of $80.00, signalling upside risk potential of 35.66%. On the other hand The Travelers Companies has an analysts' consensus of $276.26 which suggests that it could grow by 3.06%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than The Travelers Companies, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than The Travelers Companies.

Mercury General has a beta of 0.905, which suggesting that the stock is 9.548% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.533, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.67%.

Mercury General has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. The Travelers Companies offers a yield of 1.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. Mercury General pays 15.03% of its earnings as a dividend. The Travelers Companies pays out 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercury General quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues of $11.8B. Mercury General's net income of $101.1M is lower than The Travelers Companies's net income of $395M. Notably, Mercury General's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.98x while The Travelers Companies's PE ratio is 14.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury General is 0.60x versus 1.32x for The Travelers Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.