CINF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CNA Financial has a net margin of -3.51% compared to Cincinnati Financial's net margin of 0.58%. Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 10.82% beat CNA Financial's return on equity of 9.46%.

Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $152.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.7%. On the other hand CNA Financial has an analysts' consensus of $43.00 which suggests that it could fall by -9.36%. Given that Cincinnati Financial has higher upside potential than CNA Financial, analysts believe Cincinnati Financial is more attractive than CNA Financial.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.726, which suggesting that the stock is 27.386% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNA Financial has a beta of 0.528, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.159%.

Cincinnati Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. CNA Financial offers a yield of 3.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.46 per share. Cincinnati Financial pays 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. CNA Financial pays out 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CNA Financial's is not.

Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than CNA Financial quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Cincinnati Financial's net income of -$90M is lower than CNA Financial's net income of $21M. Notably, Cincinnati Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.25x while CNA Financial's PE ratio is 13.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cincinnati Financial is 2.01x versus 0.92x for CNA Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

First American Financial has a net margin of -3.51% compared to Cincinnati Financial's net margin of 4.69%. Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 10.82% beat First American Financial's return on equity of 3.21%.

Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $152.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.7%. On the other hand First American Financial has an analysts' consensus of $77.20 which suggests that it could grow by 27.56%. Given that First American Financial has higher upside potential than Cincinnati Financial, analysts believe First American Financial is more attractive than Cincinnati Financial.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.726, which suggesting that the stock is 27.386% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First American Financial has a beta of 1.294, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.44%.

Cincinnati Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. First American Financial offers a yield of 3.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share. Cincinnati Financial pays 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. First American Financial pays out 168.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but First American Financial's is not.

Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than First American Financial quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Cincinnati Financial's net income of -$90M is lower than First American Financial's net income of $74.2M. Notably, Cincinnati Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.25x while First American Financial's PE ratio is 40.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cincinnati Financial is 2.01x versus 1.00x for First American Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RLI has a net margin of -3.51% compared to Cincinnati Financial's net margin of 15.51%. Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 10.82% beat RLI's return on equity of 17.61%.

Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $152.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.7%. On the other hand RLI has an analysts' consensus of $78.25 which suggests that it could grow by 6.88%. Given that Cincinnati Financial has higher upside potential than RLI, analysts believe Cincinnati Financial is more attractive than RLI.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.726, which suggesting that the stock is 27.386% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RLI has a beta of 0.721, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.894%.

Cincinnati Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. RLI offers a yield of 0.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Cincinnati Financial pays 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. RLI pays out 68.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than RLI quarterly revenues of $407.7M. Cincinnati Financial's net income of -$90M is lower than RLI's net income of $63.2M. Notably, Cincinnati Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.25x while RLI's PE ratio is 24.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cincinnati Financial is 2.01x versus 3.91x for RLI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a net margin of -3.51% compared to Cincinnati Financial's net margin of 10.49%. Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 10.82% beat Universal Insurance Holdings's return on equity of 17.07%.

Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $152.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.7%. On the other hand Universal Insurance Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $29.00 which suggests that it could grow by 20.78%. Given that Universal Insurance Holdings has higher upside potential than Cincinnati Financial, analysts believe Universal Insurance Holdings is more attractive than Cincinnati Financial.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.726, which suggesting that the stock is 27.386% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Insurance Holdings has a beta of 0.829, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.082%.

Cincinnati Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. Universal Insurance Holdings offers a yield of 2.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Cincinnati Financial pays 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Insurance Holdings pays out 37.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Universal Insurance Holdings quarterly revenues of $394.9M. Cincinnati Financial's net income of -$90M is lower than Universal Insurance Holdings's net income of $41.4M. Notably, Cincinnati Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.25x while Universal Insurance Holdings's PE ratio is 10.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cincinnati Financial is 2.01x versus 0.45x for Universal Insurance Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.