CINF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

RLI has a net margin of -3.51% compared to Cincinnati Financial's net margin of 15.51%. Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 10.82% beat RLI's return on equity of 17.61%.

Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $152.00, signalling upside risk potential of 0.7%. On the other hand RLI has an analysts' consensus of $78.25 which suggests that it could grow by 2.74%. Given that RLI has higher upside potential than Cincinnati Financial, analysts believe RLI is more attractive than Cincinnati Financial.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.726, which suggesting that the stock is 27.386% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RLI has a beta of 0.721, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.894%.

Cincinnati Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. RLI offers a yield of 0.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Cincinnati Financial pays 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. RLI pays out 68.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than RLI quarterly revenues of $407.7M. Cincinnati Financial's net income of -$90M is lower than RLI's net income of $63.2M. Notably, Cincinnati Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.46x while RLI's PE ratio is 25.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cincinnati Financial is 2.17x versus 4.06x for RLI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safety Insurance Group has a net margin of -3.51% compared to Cincinnati Financial's net margin of 7.31%. Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 10.82% beat Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 8.75%.

Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $152.00, signalling upside risk potential of 0.7%. On the other hand Safety Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -16.16%. Given that Cincinnati Financial has higher upside potential than Safety Insurance Group, analysts believe Cincinnati Financial is more attractive than Safety Insurance Group.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.726, which suggesting that the stock is 27.386% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.218, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.16%.

Cincinnati Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. Safety Insurance Group offers a yield of 4.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Cincinnati Financial pays 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Safety Insurance Group pays out 75.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Safety Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $299.6M. Cincinnati Financial's net income of -$90M is lower than Safety Insurance Group's net income of $21.9M. Notably, Cincinnati Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.46x while Safety Insurance Group's PE ratio is 17.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cincinnati Financial is 2.17x versus 1.08x for Safety Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Selective Insurance Group has a net margin of -3.51% compared to Cincinnati Financial's net margin of 8.55%. Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 10.82% beat Selective Insurance Group's return on equity of 7.57%.

Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $152.00, signalling upside risk potential of 0.7%. On the other hand Selective Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $95.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.96%. Given that Selective Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Cincinnati Financial, analysts believe Selective Insurance Group is more attractive than Cincinnati Financial.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.726, which suggesting that the stock is 27.386% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Selective Insurance Group has a beta of 0.509, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.059%.

Cincinnati Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. Selective Insurance Group offers a yield of 1.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Cincinnati Financial pays 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Selective Insurance Group pays out 45.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Selective Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Cincinnati Financial's net income of -$90M is lower than Selective Insurance Group's net income of $109.9M. Notably, Cincinnati Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.46x while Selective Insurance Group's PE ratio is 24.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cincinnati Financial is 2.17x versus 1.10x for Selective Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WR Berkley has a net margin of -3.51% compared to Cincinnati Financial's net margin of 11.84%. Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 10.82% beat WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.93%.

Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $152.00, signalling upside risk potential of 0.7%. On the other hand WR Berkley has an analysts' consensus of $69.50 which suggests that it could fall by -7.44%. Given that Cincinnati Financial has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe Cincinnati Financial is more attractive than WR Berkley.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.726, which suggesting that the stock is 27.386% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WR Berkley has a beta of 0.435, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.478%.

Cincinnati Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. WR Berkley offers a yield of 0.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Cincinnati Financial pays 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. WR Berkley pays out 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than WR Berkley quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Cincinnati Financial's net income of -$90M is lower than WR Berkley's net income of $417.6M. Notably, Cincinnati Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.46x while WR Berkley's PE ratio is 17.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cincinnati Financial is 2.17x versus 2.11x for WR Berkley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.