LZB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flexsteel Industries has a net margin of 5.45% compared to La-Z-Boy's net margin of 8.35%. La-Z-Boy's return on equity of 12.24% beat Flexsteel Industries's return on equity of 13.18%.

La-Z-Boy has a consensus price target of $46.00, signalling upside risk potential of 18.1%. On the other hand Flexsteel Industries has an analysts' consensus of $61.00 which suggests that it could grow by 69.92%. Given that Flexsteel Industries has higher upside potential than La-Z-Boy, analysts believe Flexsteel Industries is more attractive than La-Z-Boy.

La-Z-Boy has a beta of 1.309, which suggesting that the stock is 30.943% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flexsteel Industries has a beta of 0.233, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.745%.

La-Z-Boy has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.16%. Flexsteel Industries offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. La-Z-Boy pays 26.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Flexsteel Industries pays out 30.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

La-Z-Boy quarterly revenues are $521.8M, which are larger than Flexsteel Industries quarterly revenues of $108.5M. La-Z-Boy's net income of $28.4M is higher than Flexsteel Industries's net income of $9.1M. Notably, La-Z-Boy's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.38x while Flexsteel Industries's PE ratio is 10.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for La-Z-Boy is 0.79x versus 0.47x for Flexsteel Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hooker Furnishings has a net margin of 5.45% compared to La-Z-Boy's net margin of -3.96%. La-Z-Boy's return on equity of 12.24% beat Hooker Furnishings's return on equity of -4.37%.

La-Z-Boy has a consensus price target of $46.00, signalling upside risk potential of 18.1%. On the other hand Hooker Furnishings has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 132.56%. Given that Hooker Furnishings has higher upside potential than La-Z-Boy, analysts believe Hooker Furnishings is more attractive than La-Z-Boy.

La-Z-Boy has a beta of 1.309, which suggesting that the stock is 30.943% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hooker Furnishings has a beta of 1.231, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.057%.

La-Z-Boy has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.16%. Hooker Furnishings offers a yield of 10.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. La-Z-Boy pays 26.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Hooker Furnishings pays out 98.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

La-Z-Boy quarterly revenues are $521.8M, which are larger than Hooker Furnishings quarterly revenues of $104.4M. La-Z-Boy's net income of $28.4M is higher than Hooker Furnishings's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, La-Z-Boy's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.38x while Hooker Furnishings's PE ratio is 121.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for La-Z-Boy is 0.79x versus 0.23x for Hooker Furnishings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leggett & Platt has a net margin of 5.45% compared to La-Z-Boy's net margin of 1.34%. La-Z-Boy's return on equity of 12.24% beat Leggett & Platt's return on equity of -54.14%.

La-Z-Boy has a consensus price target of $46.00, signalling upside risk potential of 18.1%. On the other hand Leggett & Platt has an analysts' consensus of $11.67 which suggests that it could grow by 55.76%. Given that Leggett & Platt has higher upside potential than La-Z-Boy, analysts believe Leggett & Platt is more attractive than La-Z-Boy.

La-Z-Boy has a beta of 1.309, which suggesting that the stock is 30.943% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leggett & Platt has a beta of 0.981, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.896%.

La-Z-Boy has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.16%. Leggett & Platt offers a yield of 2.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. La-Z-Boy pays 26.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Leggett & Platt pays out -26.65% of its earnings as a dividend. La-Z-Boy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

La-Z-Boy quarterly revenues are $521.8M, which are smaller than Leggett & Platt quarterly revenues of $1.1B. La-Z-Boy's net income of $28.4M is higher than Leggett & Platt's net income of $14.2M. Notably, La-Z-Boy's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.38x while Leggett & Platt's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for La-Z-Boy is 0.79x versus 0.24x for Leggett & Platt. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nova Lifestyle has a net margin of 5.45% compared to La-Z-Boy's net margin of -94.28%. La-Z-Boy's return on equity of 12.24% beat Nova Lifestyle's return on equity of -1289.9%.

La-Z-Boy has a consensus price target of $46.00, signalling upside risk potential of 18.1%. On the other hand Nova Lifestyle has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that La-Z-Boy has higher upside potential than Nova Lifestyle, analysts believe La-Z-Boy is more attractive than Nova Lifestyle.

La-Z-Boy has a beta of 1.309, which suggesting that the stock is 30.943% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nova Lifestyle has a beta of 0.650, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.041%.

La-Z-Boy has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.16%. Nova Lifestyle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. La-Z-Boy pays 26.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Nova Lifestyle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. La-Z-Boy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

La-Z-Boy quarterly revenues are $521.8M, which are larger than Nova Lifestyle quarterly revenues of $2.6M. La-Z-Boy's net income of $28.4M is higher than Nova Lifestyle's net income of -$2.5M. Notably, La-Z-Boy's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.38x while Nova Lifestyle's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for La-Z-Boy is 0.79x versus 0.27x for Nova Lifestyle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.