LEG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Purple Innovation has a net margin of 4.08% compared to Leggett & Platt's net margin of -33.08%. Leggett & Platt's return on equity of -72.58% beat Purple Innovation's return on equity of -131.76%.

Leggett & Platt has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 39.47%. On the other hand Purple Innovation has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 135.66%. Given that Purple Innovation has higher upside potential than Leggett & Platt, analysts believe Purple Innovation is more attractive than Leggett & Platt.

Leggett & Platt has a beta of 1.074, which suggesting that the stock is 7.365% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Purple Innovation has a beta of 2.064, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 106.393%.

Leggett & Platt has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.38%. Purple Innovation offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leggett & Platt pays -175% of its earnings as a dividend. Purple Innovation pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Leggett & Platt quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Purple Innovation quarterly revenues of $118.6M. Leggett & Platt's net income of $44.9M is higher than Purple Innovation's net income of -$39.2M. Notably, Leggett & Platt's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Purple Innovation's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leggett & Platt is 0.30x versus 0.18x for Purple Innovation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Suncliff has a net margin of 4.08% compared to Leggett & Platt's net margin of --. Leggett & Platt's return on equity of -72.58% beat Suncliff's return on equity of --.

Leggett & Platt has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 39.47%. On the other hand Suncliff has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Leggett & Platt has higher upside potential than Suncliff, analysts believe Leggett & Platt is more attractive than Suncliff.

Leggett & Platt has a beta of 1.074, which suggesting that the stock is 7.365% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Suncliff has a beta of 52.322, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5132.152%.

Leggett & Platt has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.38%. Suncliff offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leggett & Platt pays -175% of its earnings as a dividend. Suncliff pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Leggett & Platt quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Suncliff quarterly revenues of --. Leggett & Platt's net income of $44.9M is higher than Suncliff's net income of --. Notably, Leggett & Platt's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Suncliff's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leggett & Platt is 0.30x versus 0.77x for Suncliff. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sleep Number has a net margin of 4.08% compared to Leggett & Platt's net margin of -0.74%. Leggett & Platt's return on equity of -72.58% beat Sleep Number's return on equity of --.

Leggett & Platt has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 39.47%. On the other hand Sleep Number has an analysts' consensus of $12.50 which suggests that it could fall by -17.76%. Given that Leggett & Platt has higher upside potential than Sleep Number, analysts believe Leggett & Platt is more attractive than Sleep Number.

Leggett & Platt has a beta of 1.074, which suggesting that the stock is 7.365% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sleep Number has a beta of 2.084, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.439%.

Leggett & Platt has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.38%. Sleep Number offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leggett & Platt pays -175% of its earnings as a dividend. Sleep Number pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Leggett & Platt quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Sleep Number quarterly revenues of $426.6M. Leggett & Platt's net income of $44.9M is higher than Sleep Number's net income of -$3.1M. Notably, Leggett & Platt's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sleep Number's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leggett & Platt is 0.30x versus 0.20x for Sleep Number. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tempur Sealy International has a net margin of 4.08% compared to Leggett & Platt's net margin of 10%. Leggett & Platt's return on equity of -72.58% beat Tempur Sealy International's return on equity of 103.24%.

Leggett & Platt has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 39.47%. On the other hand Tempur Sealy International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 12.21%. Given that Leggett & Platt has higher upside potential than Tempur Sealy International, analysts believe Leggett & Platt is more attractive than Tempur Sealy International.

Leggett & Platt has a beta of 1.074, which suggesting that the stock is 7.365% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tempur Sealy International has a beta of 1.640, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.029%.

Leggett & Platt has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.38%. Tempur Sealy International offers a yield of 0.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Leggett & Platt pays -175% of its earnings as a dividend. Tempur Sealy International pays out 21.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Tempur Sealy International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Leggett & Platt quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Tempur Sealy International quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Leggett & Platt's net income of $44.9M is lower than Tempur Sealy International's net income of $130M. Notably, Leggett & Platt's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tempur Sealy International's PE ratio is 25.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leggett & Platt is 0.30x versus 2.00x for Tempur Sealy International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.