FLXS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bassett Furniture Industries has a net margin of 3.98% compared to Flexsteel Industries's net margin of -8.63%. Flexsteel Industries's return on equity of 9.46% beat Bassett Furniture Industries's return on equity of -8.22%.

Flexsteel Industries has a consensus price target of $48.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4.77%. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 37.09%. Given that Bassett Furniture Industries has higher upside potential than Flexsteel Industries, analysts believe Bassett Furniture Industries is more attractive than Flexsteel Industries.

Flexsteel Industries has a beta of 0.399, which suggesting that the stock is 60.138% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries has a beta of 1.687, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.726%.

Flexsteel Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. Bassett Furniture Industries offers a yield of 5.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Flexsteel Industries pays 30.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries pays out -188.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Flexsteel Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flexsteel Industries quarterly revenues are $104M, which are larger than Bassett Furniture Industries quarterly revenues of $83.4M. Flexsteel Industries's net income of $4.1M is higher than Bassett Furniture Industries's net income of -$7.2M. Notably, Flexsteel Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.88x while Bassett Furniture Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flexsteel Industries is 0.73x versus 0.36x for Bassett Furniture Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hooker Furnishings has a net margin of 3.98% compared to Flexsteel Industries's net margin of -3.96%. Flexsteel Industries's return on equity of 9.46% beat Hooker Furnishings's return on equity of -4.37%.

Flexsteel Industries has a consensus price target of $48.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4.77%. On the other hand Hooker Furnishings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 49.14%. Given that Hooker Furnishings has higher upside potential than Flexsteel Industries, analysts believe Hooker Furnishings is more attractive than Flexsteel Industries.

Flexsteel Industries has a beta of 0.399, which suggesting that the stock is 60.138% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hooker Furnishings has a beta of 1.221, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.138%.

Flexsteel Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. Hooker Furnishings offers a yield of 6.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Flexsteel Industries pays 30.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Hooker Furnishings pays out 98.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flexsteel Industries quarterly revenues are $104M, which are smaller than Hooker Furnishings quarterly revenues of $104.4M. Flexsteel Industries's net income of $4.1M is higher than Hooker Furnishings's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, Flexsteel Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.88x while Hooker Furnishings's PE ratio is 111.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flexsteel Industries is 0.73x versus 0.36x for Hooker Furnishings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

La-Z-Boy has a net margin of 3.98% compared to Flexsteel Industries's net margin of 5.77%. Flexsteel Industries's return on equity of 9.46% beat La-Z-Boy's return on equity of 12.4%.

Flexsteel Industries has a consensus price target of $48.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4.77%. On the other hand La-Z-Boy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 6.19%. Given that La-Z-Boy has higher upside potential than Flexsteel Industries, analysts believe La-Z-Boy is more attractive than Flexsteel Industries.

Flexsteel Industries has a beta of 0.399, which suggesting that the stock is 60.138% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison La-Z-Boy has a beta of 1.346, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.58%.

Flexsteel Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. La-Z-Boy offers a yield of 1.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Flexsteel Industries pays 30.58% of its earnings as a dividend. La-Z-Boy pays out 26.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flexsteel Industries quarterly revenues are $104M, which are smaller than La-Z-Boy quarterly revenues of $521M. Flexsteel Industries's net income of $4.1M is lower than La-Z-Boy's net income of $30M. Notably, Flexsteel Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.88x while La-Z-Boy's PE ratio is 14.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flexsteel Industries is 0.73x versus 0.89x for La-Z-Boy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nova Lifestyle has a net margin of 3.98% compared to Flexsteel Industries's net margin of -94.28%. Flexsteel Industries's return on equity of 9.46% beat Nova Lifestyle's return on equity of -1289.9%.

Flexsteel Industries has a consensus price target of $48.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4.77%. On the other hand Nova Lifestyle has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Flexsteel Industries has higher upside potential than Nova Lifestyle, analysts believe Flexsteel Industries is more attractive than Nova Lifestyle.

Flexsteel Industries has a beta of 0.399, which suggesting that the stock is 60.138% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nova Lifestyle has a beta of 1.123, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.315%.

Flexsteel Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. Nova Lifestyle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flexsteel Industries pays 30.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Nova Lifestyle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flexsteel Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flexsteel Industries quarterly revenues are $104M, which are larger than Nova Lifestyle quarterly revenues of $2.6M. Flexsteel Industries's net income of $4.1M is higher than Nova Lifestyle's net income of -$2.5M. Notably, Flexsteel Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.88x while Nova Lifestyle's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flexsteel Industries is 0.73x versus 0.13x for Nova Lifestyle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.