LII Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CECO Environmental has a net margin of 11.22% compared to Lennox International's net margin of 20.37%. Lennox International's return on equity of 117.97% beat CECO Environmental's return on equity of 18.77%.

Lennox International has a consensus price target of $558.61, signalling downside risk potential of -2.78%. On the other hand CECO Environmental has an analysts' consensus of $33.67 which suggests that it could grow by 23.14%. Given that CECO Environmental has higher upside potential than Lennox International, analysts believe CECO Environmental is more attractive than Lennox International.

Lennox International has a beta of 1.182, which suggesting that the stock is 18.168% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CECO Environmental has a beta of 1.308, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.82%.

Lennox International has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. CECO Environmental offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lennox International pays 19.87% of its earnings as a dividend. CECO Environmental pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lennox International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lennox International quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than CECO Environmental quarterly revenues of $176.7M. Lennox International's net income of $120.3M is higher than CECO Environmental's net income of $36M. Notably, Lennox International's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.61x while CECO Environmental's PE ratio is 21.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lennox International is 3.83x versus 1.64x for CECO Environmental. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fuel Tech has a net margin of 11.22% compared to Lennox International's net margin of -11.58%. Lennox International's return on equity of 117.97% beat Fuel Tech's return on equity of -6.9%.

Lennox International has a consensus price target of $558.61, signalling downside risk potential of -2.78%. On the other hand Fuel Tech has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 138.1%. Given that Fuel Tech has higher upside potential than Lennox International, analysts believe Fuel Tech is more attractive than Lennox International.

Lennox International has a beta of 1.182, which suggesting that the stock is 18.168% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fuel Tech has a beta of 4.384, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 338.367%.

Lennox International has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. Fuel Tech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lennox International pays 19.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Fuel Tech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lennox International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lennox International quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Fuel Tech quarterly revenues of $6.4M. Lennox International's net income of $120.3M is higher than Fuel Tech's net income of -$739K. Notably, Lennox International's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.61x while Fuel Tech's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lennox International is 3.83x versus 1.94x for Fuel Tech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Limbach Holdings has a net margin of 11.22% compared to Lennox International's net margin of 7.67%. Lennox International's return on equity of 117.97% beat Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 23.42%.

Lennox International has a consensus price target of $558.61, signalling downside risk potential of -2.78%. On the other hand Limbach Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $125.50 which suggests that it could fall by -0.1%. Given that Lennox International has more downside risk than Limbach Holdings, analysts believe Limbach Holdings is more attractive than Lennox International.

Lennox International has a beta of 1.182, which suggesting that the stock is 18.168% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.080, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.953%.

Lennox International has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. Limbach Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lennox International pays 19.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Limbach Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lennox International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lennox International quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues of $133.1M. Lennox International's net income of $120.3M is higher than Limbach Holdings's net income of $10.2M. Notably, Lennox International's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.61x while Limbach Holdings's PE ratio is 45.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lennox International is 3.83x versus 2.84x for Limbach Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trane Technologies PLC has a net margin of 11.22% compared to Lennox International's net margin of 12.9%. Lennox International's return on equity of 117.97% beat Trane Technologies PLC's return on equity of 37.49%.

Lennox International has a consensus price target of $558.61, signalling downside risk potential of -2.78%. On the other hand Trane Technologies PLC has an analysts' consensus of $412.18 which suggests that it could fall by -2.85%. Given that Trane Technologies PLC has more downside risk than Lennox International, analysts believe Lennox International is more attractive than Trane Technologies PLC.

Lennox International has a beta of 1.182, which suggesting that the stock is 18.168% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trane Technologies PLC has a beta of 1.140, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.986%.

Lennox International has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. Trane Technologies PLC offers a yield of 0.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share. Lennox International pays 19.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Trane Technologies PLC pays out 29.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lennox International quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Trane Technologies PLC quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Lennox International's net income of $120.3M is lower than Trane Technologies PLC's net income of $604.9M. Notably, Lennox International's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.61x while Trane Technologies PLC's PE ratio is 35.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lennox International is 3.83x versus 4.75x for Trane Technologies PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.