LII Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CECO Environmental has a net margin of 11.22% compared to Lennox International's net margin of 20.37%. Lennox International's return on equity of 117.97% beat CECO Environmental's return on equity of 18.77%.

Lennox International has a consensus price target of $545.28, signalling downside risk potential of -3.13%. On the other hand CECO Environmental has an analysts' consensus of $33.67 which suggests that it could grow by 32.76%. Given that CECO Environmental has higher upside potential than Lennox International, analysts believe CECO Environmental is more attractive than Lennox International.

Lennox International has a beta of 1.182, which suggesting that the stock is 18.168% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CECO Environmental has a beta of 1.308, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.82%.

Lennox International has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.82%. CECO Environmental offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lennox International pays 19.87% of its earnings as a dividend. CECO Environmental pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lennox International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lennox International quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than CECO Environmental quarterly revenues of $176.7M. Lennox International's net income of $120.3M is higher than CECO Environmental's net income of $36M. Notably, Lennox International's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.09x while CECO Environmental's PE ratio is 19.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lennox International is 3.75x versus 1.52x for CECO Environmental. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Limbach Holdings has a net margin of 11.22% compared to Lennox International's net margin of 6.85%. Lennox International's return on equity of 117.97% beat Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 22.87%.

Lennox International has a consensus price target of $545.28, signalling downside risk potential of -3.13%. On the other hand Limbach Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $107.00 which suggests that it could grow by 3.55%. Given that Limbach Holdings has higher upside potential than Lennox International, analysts believe Limbach Holdings is more attractive than Lennox International.

Lennox International has a beta of 1.182, which suggesting that the stock is 18.168% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.080, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.953%.

Lennox International has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.82%. Limbach Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lennox International pays 19.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Limbach Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lennox International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lennox International quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues of $143.7M. Lennox International's net income of $120.3M is higher than Limbach Holdings's net income of $9.8M. Notably, Lennox International's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.09x while Limbach Holdings's PE ratio is 40.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lennox International is 3.75x versus 2.39x for Limbach Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northwest Pipe has a net margin of 11.22% compared to Lennox International's net margin of 3.41%. Lennox International's return on equity of 117.97% beat Northwest Pipe's return on equity of 9.1%.

Lennox International has a consensus price target of $545.28, signalling downside risk potential of -3.13%. On the other hand Northwest Pipe has an analysts' consensus of $53.33 which suggests that it could grow by 38.64%. Given that Northwest Pipe has higher upside potential than Lennox International, analysts believe Northwest Pipe is more attractive than Lennox International.

Lennox International has a beta of 1.182, which suggesting that the stock is 18.168% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northwest Pipe has a beta of 0.957, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.269%.

Lennox International has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.82%. Northwest Pipe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lennox International pays 19.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Northwest Pipe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lennox International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lennox International quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Northwest Pipe quarterly revenues of $116.1M. Lennox International's net income of $120.3M is higher than Northwest Pipe's net income of $4M. Notably, Lennox International's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.09x while Northwest Pipe's PE ratio is 11.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lennox International is 3.75x versus 0.78x for Northwest Pipe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trane Technologies PLC has a net margin of 11.22% compared to Lennox International's net margin of 12.9%. Lennox International's return on equity of 117.97% beat Trane Technologies PLC's return on equity of 37.49%.

Lennox International has a consensus price target of $545.28, signalling downside risk potential of -3.13%. On the other hand Trane Technologies PLC has an analysts' consensus of $399.35 which suggests that it could fall by -0.88%. Given that Lennox International has more downside risk than Trane Technologies PLC, analysts believe Trane Technologies PLC is more attractive than Lennox International.

Lennox International has a beta of 1.182, which suggesting that the stock is 18.168% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trane Technologies PLC has a beta of 1.140, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.986%.

Lennox International has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.82%. Trane Technologies PLC offers a yield of 0.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share. Lennox International pays 19.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Trane Technologies PLC pays out 29.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lennox International quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Trane Technologies PLC quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Lennox International's net income of $120.3M is lower than Trane Technologies PLC's net income of $604.9M. Notably, Lennox International's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.09x while Trane Technologies PLC's PE ratio is 33.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lennox International is 3.75x versus 4.51x for Trane Technologies PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.