CECO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Donaldson has a net margin of 20.37% compared to CECO Environmental's net margin of 11.02%. CECO Environmental's return on equity of 18.77% beat Donaldson's return on equity of 28.11%.

CECO Environmental has a consensus price target of $33.67, signalling upside risk potential of 25.44%. On the other hand Donaldson has an analysts' consensus of $70.50 which suggests that it could fall by -1.2%. Given that CECO Environmental has higher upside potential than Donaldson, analysts believe CECO Environmental is more attractive than Donaldson.

CECO Environmental has a beta of 1.308, which suggesting that the stock is 30.82% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Donaldson has a beta of 1.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.66900000000001%.

CECO Environmental has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Donaldson offers a yield of 1.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. CECO Environmental pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson pays out 29.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CECO Environmental quarterly revenues are $176.7M, which are smaller than Donaldson quarterly revenues of $870M. CECO Environmental's net income of $36M is lower than Donaldson's net income of $95.9M. Notably, CECO Environmental's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.81x while Donaldson's PE ratio is 20.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CECO Environmental is 1.61x versus 2.39x for Donaldson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fuel Tech has a net margin of 20.37% compared to CECO Environmental's net margin of -11.58%. CECO Environmental's return on equity of 18.77% beat Fuel Tech's return on equity of -6.9%.

CECO Environmental has a consensus price target of $33.67, signalling upside risk potential of 25.44%. On the other hand Fuel Tech has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 253.98%. Given that Fuel Tech has higher upside potential than CECO Environmental, analysts believe Fuel Tech is more attractive than CECO Environmental.

CECO Environmental has a beta of 1.308, which suggesting that the stock is 30.82% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fuel Tech has a beta of 4.384, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 338.367%.

CECO Environmental has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fuel Tech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CECO Environmental pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fuel Tech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CECO Environmental quarterly revenues are $176.7M, which are larger than Fuel Tech quarterly revenues of $6.4M. CECO Environmental's net income of $36M is higher than Fuel Tech's net income of -$739K. Notably, CECO Environmental's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.81x while Fuel Tech's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CECO Environmental is 1.61x versus 1.31x for Fuel Tech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kronos Advanced Technologies has a net margin of 20.37% compared to CECO Environmental's net margin of --. CECO Environmental's return on equity of 18.77% beat Kronos Advanced Technologies's return on equity of --.

CECO Environmental has a consensus price target of $33.67, signalling upside risk potential of 25.44%. On the other hand Kronos Advanced Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 10563.51%. Given that Kronos Advanced Technologies has higher upside potential than CECO Environmental, analysts believe Kronos Advanced Technologies is more attractive than CECO Environmental.

CECO Environmental has a beta of 1.308, which suggesting that the stock is 30.82% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kronos Advanced Technologies has a beta of 3.081, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 208.136%.

CECO Environmental has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kronos Advanced Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CECO Environmental pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kronos Advanced Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CECO Environmental quarterly revenues are $176.7M, which are larger than Kronos Advanced Technologies quarterly revenues of --. CECO Environmental's net income of $36M is higher than Kronos Advanced Technologies's net income of --. Notably, CECO Environmental's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.81x while Kronos Advanced Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CECO Environmental is 1.61x versus -- for Kronos Advanced Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Limbach Holdings has a net margin of 20.37% compared to CECO Environmental's net margin of 7.67%. CECO Environmental's return on equity of 18.77% beat Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 23.42%.

CECO Environmental has a consensus price target of $33.67, signalling upside risk potential of 25.44%. On the other hand Limbach Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $125.50 which suggests that it could grow by 0.28%. Given that CECO Environmental has higher upside potential than Limbach Holdings, analysts believe CECO Environmental is more attractive than Limbach Holdings.

CECO Environmental has a beta of 1.308, which suggesting that the stock is 30.82% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.080, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.953%.

CECO Environmental has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Limbach Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CECO Environmental pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Limbach Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CECO Environmental quarterly revenues are $176.7M, which are larger than Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues of $133.1M. CECO Environmental's net income of $36M is higher than Limbach Holdings's net income of $10.2M. Notably, CECO Environmental's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.81x while Limbach Holdings's PE ratio is 44.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CECO Environmental is 1.61x versus 2.83x for Limbach Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.