Financhill
Buy
93

LMB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$128.20
Seasonality move :
14.77%
Day range:
$124.22 - $128.84
52-week range:
$48.17 - $129.40
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
45.03x
P/S ratio:
2.84x
P/B ratio:
9.06x
Volume:
151.2K
Avg. volume:
261.8K
1-year change:
124.52%
Market cap:
$1.5B
Revenue:
$518.8M
EPS (TTM):
$2.79

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
LMB
Limbach Holdings
$121.1M $0.43 17.98% 54.5% $125.50
AAON
AAON
$290.4M $0.24 10.34% -28.5% $111.25
CECO
CECO Environmental
$151.5M $0.09 29.91% 47.23% $33.67
FTEK
Fuel Tech
$6.6M -$0.02 -13.58% -200% $4.00
GFF
Griffon
$618.2M $1.09 0.33% 78.37% $96.71
LII
Lennox International
$1B $3.25 2.02% -0.53% $558.61
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
LMB
Limbach Holdings
$125.62 $125.50 $1.5B 45.03x $0.00 0% 2.84x
AAON
AAON
$99.94 $111.25 $8.1B 52.60x $0.10 0.34% 6.62x
CECO
CECO Environmental
$27.34 $33.67 $964.2M 21.19x $0.00 0% 1.64x
FTEK
Fuel Tech
$1.68 $4.00 $51.7M -- $0.00 0% 1.94x
GFF
Griffon
$67.63 $96.71 $3.2B 14.00x $0.18 0.98% 1.27x
LII
Lennox International
$574.60 $558.61 $20.4B 25.61x $1.15 0.8% 3.83x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
LMB
Limbach Holdings
5.64% 3.184 1.11% 1.47x
AAON
AAON
23.63% 1.285 3.97% 1.75x
CECO
CECO Environmental
54.36% 3.175 42.13% 1.37x
FTEK
Fuel Tech
-- -0.534 -- 6.40x
GFF
Griffon
87.74% 2.276 45.51% 1.30x
LII
Lennox International
56.2% 1.490 5.5% 0.68x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
LMB
Limbach Holdings
$36.7M $8.3M 20.89% 23.42% 6.4% $11K
AAON
AAON
$86.4M $35.1M 17.6% 20.04% 10.96% -$78.6M
CECO
CECO Environmental
$62.2M $5.5M 10.65% 18.77% 34.68% -$15.1M
FTEK
Fuel Tech
$3M -$952K -6.9% -6.9% -14.92% $1.4M
GFF
Griffon
$252.2M $101.2M 13.25% 105.75% 16.77% $2.7M
LII
Lennox International
$328.5M $157.2M 44.73% 117.97% 14.41% -$61.3M

Limbach Holdings vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns LMB or AAON?

    AAON has a net margin of 7.67% compared to Limbach Holdings's net margin of 9.1%. Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 23.42% beat AAON's return on equity of 20.04%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LMB
    Limbach Holdings
    27.59% $0.85 $170.8M
    AAON
    AAON
    26.82% $0.35 $1.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About LMB or AAON?

    Limbach Holdings has a consensus price target of $125.50, signalling downside risk potential of -0.1%. On the other hand AAON has an analysts' consensus of $111.25 which suggests that it could grow by 11.32%. Given that AAON has higher upside potential than Limbach Holdings, analysts believe AAON is more attractive than Limbach Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LMB
    Limbach Holdings
    2 0 0
    AAON
    AAON
    2 3 0
  • Is LMB or AAON More Risky?

    Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.080, which suggesting that the stock is 7.953% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AAON has a beta of 1.059, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.91%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LMB or AAON?

    Limbach Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AAON offers a yield of 0.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Limbach Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AAON pays out 15.48% of its earnings as a dividend. AAON's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LMB or AAON?

    Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues are $133.1M, which are smaller than AAON quarterly revenues of $322.1M. Limbach Holdings's net income of $10.2M is lower than AAON's net income of $29.3M. Notably, Limbach Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.03x while AAON's PE ratio is 52.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Limbach Holdings is 2.84x versus 6.62x for AAON. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LMB
    Limbach Holdings
    2.84x 45.03x $133.1M $10.2M
    AAON
    AAON
    6.62x 52.60x $322.1M $29.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns LMB or CECO?

    CECO Environmental has a net margin of 7.67% compared to Limbach Holdings's net margin of 20.37%. Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 23.42% beat CECO Environmental's return on equity of 18.77%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LMB
    Limbach Holdings
    27.59% $0.85 $170.8M
    CECO
    CECO Environmental
    35.18% $0.98 $630.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About LMB or CECO?

    Limbach Holdings has a consensus price target of $125.50, signalling downside risk potential of -0.1%. On the other hand CECO Environmental has an analysts' consensus of $33.67 which suggests that it could grow by 23.14%. Given that CECO Environmental has higher upside potential than Limbach Holdings, analysts believe CECO Environmental is more attractive than Limbach Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LMB
    Limbach Holdings
    2 0 0
    CECO
    CECO Environmental
    3 0 0
  • Is LMB or CECO More Risky?

    Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.080, which suggesting that the stock is 7.953% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CECO Environmental has a beta of 1.308, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.82%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LMB or CECO?

    Limbach Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CECO Environmental offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Limbach Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CECO Environmental pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LMB or CECO?

    Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues are $133.1M, which are smaller than CECO Environmental quarterly revenues of $176.7M. Limbach Holdings's net income of $10.2M is lower than CECO Environmental's net income of $36M. Notably, Limbach Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.03x while CECO Environmental's PE ratio is 21.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Limbach Holdings is 2.84x versus 1.64x for CECO Environmental. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LMB
    Limbach Holdings
    2.84x 45.03x $133.1M $10.2M
    CECO
    CECO Environmental
    1.64x 21.19x $176.7M $36M
  • Which has Higher Returns LMB or FTEK?

    Fuel Tech has a net margin of 7.67% compared to Limbach Holdings's net margin of -11.58%. Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 23.42% beat Fuel Tech's return on equity of -6.9%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LMB
    Limbach Holdings
    27.59% $0.85 $170.8M
    FTEK
    Fuel Tech
    46.37% -$0.02 $41.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About LMB or FTEK?

    Limbach Holdings has a consensus price target of $125.50, signalling downside risk potential of -0.1%. On the other hand Fuel Tech has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 138.1%. Given that Fuel Tech has higher upside potential than Limbach Holdings, analysts believe Fuel Tech is more attractive than Limbach Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LMB
    Limbach Holdings
    2 0 0
    FTEK
    Fuel Tech
    0 0 0
  • Is LMB or FTEK More Risky?

    Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.080, which suggesting that the stock is 7.953% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fuel Tech has a beta of 4.384, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 338.367%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LMB or FTEK?

    Limbach Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fuel Tech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Limbach Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fuel Tech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LMB or FTEK?

    Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues are $133.1M, which are larger than Fuel Tech quarterly revenues of $6.4M. Limbach Holdings's net income of $10.2M is higher than Fuel Tech's net income of -$739K. Notably, Limbach Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.03x while Fuel Tech's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Limbach Holdings is 2.84x versus 1.94x for Fuel Tech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LMB
    Limbach Holdings
    2.84x 45.03x $133.1M $10.2M
    FTEK
    Fuel Tech
    1.94x -- $6.4M -$739K
  • Which has Higher Returns LMB or GFF?

    Griffon has a net margin of 7.67% compared to Limbach Holdings's net margin of 9.28%. Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 23.42% beat Griffon's return on equity of 105.75%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LMB
    Limbach Holdings
    27.59% $0.85 $170.8M
    GFF
    Griffon
    41.23% $1.21 $1.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About LMB or GFF?

    Limbach Holdings has a consensus price target of $125.50, signalling downside risk potential of -0.1%. On the other hand Griffon has an analysts' consensus of $96.71 which suggests that it could grow by 43.01%. Given that Griffon has higher upside potential than Limbach Holdings, analysts believe Griffon is more attractive than Limbach Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LMB
    Limbach Holdings
    2 0 0
    GFF
    Griffon
    6 0 0
  • Is LMB or GFF More Risky?

    Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.080, which suggesting that the stock is 7.953% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Griffon has a beta of 1.172, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.215%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LMB or GFF?

    Limbach Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Griffon offers a yield of 0.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Limbach Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Griffon pays out 17.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Griffon's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LMB or GFF?

    Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues are $133.1M, which are smaller than Griffon quarterly revenues of $611.7M. Limbach Holdings's net income of $10.2M is lower than Griffon's net income of $56.8M. Notably, Limbach Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.03x while Griffon's PE ratio is 14.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Limbach Holdings is 2.84x versus 1.27x for Griffon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LMB
    Limbach Holdings
    2.84x 45.03x $133.1M $10.2M
    GFF
    Griffon
    1.27x 14.00x $611.7M $56.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns LMB or LII?

    Lennox International has a net margin of 7.67% compared to Limbach Holdings's net margin of 11.22%. Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 23.42% beat Lennox International's return on equity of 117.97%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LMB
    Limbach Holdings
    27.59% $0.85 $170.8M
    LII
    Lennox International
    30.63% $3.37 $1.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About LMB or LII?

    Limbach Holdings has a consensus price target of $125.50, signalling downside risk potential of -0.1%. On the other hand Lennox International has an analysts' consensus of $558.61 which suggests that it could fall by -2.78%. Given that Lennox International has more downside risk than Limbach Holdings, analysts believe Limbach Holdings is more attractive than Lennox International.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LMB
    Limbach Holdings
    2 0 0
    LII
    Lennox International
    4 8 4
  • Is LMB or LII More Risky?

    Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.080, which suggesting that the stock is 7.953% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lennox International has a beta of 1.182, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.168%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LMB or LII?

    Limbach Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lennox International offers a yield of 0.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. Limbach Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lennox International pays out 19.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Lennox International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LMB or LII?

    Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues are $133.1M, which are smaller than Lennox International quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Limbach Holdings's net income of $10.2M is lower than Lennox International's net income of $120.3M. Notably, Limbach Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.03x while Lennox International's PE ratio is 25.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Limbach Holdings is 2.84x versus 3.83x for Lennox International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LMB
    Limbach Holdings
    2.84x 45.03x $133.1M $10.2M
    LII
    Lennox International
    3.83x 25.61x $1.1B $120.3M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Where Will Cognizant Stock Be In 5 Years?
Where Will Cognizant Stock Be In 5 Years?

Cognizant Technologies (NASDAQ:CTSH) is a global provider of IT services…

NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?

NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) and Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) are two of the hottest…

Why Did Forge Global Stock Go Down?
Why Did Forge Global Stock Go Down?

Shares of Forge Global (NYSE:FRGE), a platform that allows accredited…

Stock Ideas

Buy
68
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Buy
66
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 45x

Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Alerts

Buy
54
AAP alert for May 23

Advance Auto Parts [AAP] is down 0.98% over the past day.

Buy
67
IONQ alert for May 23

IonQ [IONQ] is down 0.48% over the past day.

Buy
75
URBN alert for May 23

Urban Outfitters [URBN] is down 1.24% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock