Financhill
Buy
93

LMB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$113.16
Seasonality move :
4.54%
Day range:
$102.25 - $105.00
52-week range:
$43.78 - $107.00
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
40.05x
P/S ratio:
2.39x
P/B ratio:
7.83x
Volume:
330.9K
Avg. volume:
275.7K
1-year change:
128.05%
Market cap:
$1.2B
Revenue:
$518.8M
EPS (TTM):
$2.58

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
LMB
Limbach Holdings
$121.1M $0.43 19.18% 76.5% $107.00
AAON
AAON
$290.4M $0.24 11.28% -21.2% $111.25
CECO
CECO Environmental
$151.5M $0.09 29.91% 47.23% $33.67
DCI
Donaldson
$936M $0.94 0.88% 2.49% $70.50
FTEK
Fuel Tech
$6.6M -$0.02 33.95% -50% $4.00
LII
Lennox International
$1B $3.25 2.02% -0.53% $545.28
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
LMB
Limbach Holdings
$103.33 $107.00 $1.2B 40.05x $0.00 0% 2.39x
AAON
AAON
$98.92 $111.25 $8B 52.06x $0.10 0.34% 6.55x
CECO
CECO Environmental
$25.36 $33.67 $894.4M 19.66x $0.00 0% 1.52x
DCI
Donaldson
$66.65 $70.50 $8B 19.49x $0.27 1.62% 2.24x
FTEK
Fuel Tech
$0.97 $4.00 $29.8M -- $0.00 0% 1.18x
LII
Lennox International
$562.92 $545.28 $20B 25.09x $1.15 0.82% 3.75x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
LMB
Limbach Holdings
5.9% 3.184 1% 1.40x
AAON
AAON
23.63% 1.285 3.97% 1.75x
CECO
CECO Environmental
54.36% 3.175 42.13% 1.37x
DCI
Donaldson
27.21% 0.992 7.17% 1.03x
FTEK
Fuel Tech
-- -0.534 -- 4.79x
LII
Lennox International
56.2% 1.490 5.5% 0.68x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
LMB
Limbach Holdings
$43.6M $14.4M 20.27% 22.87% 9.72% $18M
AAON
AAON
$86.4M $35.1M 17.6% 20.04% 10.96% -$78.6M
CECO
CECO Environmental
$62.2M $5.5M 10.65% 18.77% 34.68% -$15.1M
DCI
Donaldson
$305.9M $125.5M 20.17% 28.11% 15.05% $71.5M
FTEK
Fuel Tech
$2.2M -$2.1M -4.48% -4.48% -34.53% -$1.7M
LII
Lennox International
$328.5M $157.2M 44.73% 117.97% 14.41% -$61.3M

Limbach Holdings vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns LMB or AAON?

    AAON has a net margin of 6.85% compared to Limbach Holdings's net margin of 9.1%. Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 22.87% beat AAON's return on equity of 20.04%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LMB
    Limbach Holdings
    30.33% $0.82 $163.1M
    AAON
    AAON
    26.82% $0.35 $1.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About LMB or AAON?

    Limbach Holdings has a consensus price target of $107.00, signalling upside risk potential of 3.55%. On the other hand AAON has an analysts' consensus of $111.25 which suggests that it could grow by 12.47%. Given that AAON has higher upside potential than Limbach Holdings, analysts believe AAON is more attractive than Limbach Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LMB
    Limbach Holdings
    2 0 0
    AAON
    AAON
    2 3 0
  • Is LMB or AAON More Risky?

    Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.080, which suggesting that the stock is 7.953% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AAON has a beta of 1.059, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.91%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LMB or AAON?

    Limbach Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AAON offers a yield of 0.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Limbach Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AAON pays out 15.48% of its earnings as a dividend. AAON's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LMB or AAON?

    Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues are $143.7M, which are smaller than AAON quarterly revenues of $322.1M. Limbach Holdings's net income of $9.8M is lower than AAON's net income of $29.3M. Notably, Limbach Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.05x while AAON's PE ratio is 52.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Limbach Holdings is 2.39x versus 6.55x for AAON. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LMB
    Limbach Holdings
    2.39x 40.05x $143.7M $9.8M
    AAON
    AAON
    6.55x 52.06x $322.1M $29.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns LMB or CECO?

    CECO Environmental has a net margin of 6.85% compared to Limbach Holdings's net margin of 20.37%. Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 22.87% beat CECO Environmental's return on equity of 18.77%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LMB
    Limbach Holdings
    30.33% $0.82 $163.1M
    CECO
    CECO Environmental
    35.18% $0.98 $630.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About LMB or CECO?

    Limbach Holdings has a consensus price target of $107.00, signalling upside risk potential of 3.55%. On the other hand CECO Environmental has an analysts' consensus of $33.67 which suggests that it could grow by 32.76%. Given that CECO Environmental has higher upside potential than Limbach Holdings, analysts believe CECO Environmental is more attractive than Limbach Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LMB
    Limbach Holdings
    2 0 0
    CECO
    CECO Environmental
    3 0 0
  • Is LMB or CECO More Risky?

    Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.080, which suggesting that the stock is 7.953% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CECO Environmental has a beta of 1.308, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.82%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LMB or CECO?

    Limbach Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CECO Environmental offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Limbach Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CECO Environmental pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LMB or CECO?

    Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues are $143.7M, which are smaller than CECO Environmental quarterly revenues of $176.7M. Limbach Holdings's net income of $9.8M is lower than CECO Environmental's net income of $36M. Notably, Limbach Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.05x while CECO Environmental's PE ratio is 19.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Limbach Holdings is 2.39x versus 1.52x for CECO Environmental. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LMB
    Limbach Holdings
    2.39x 40.05x $143.7M $9.8M
    CECO
    CECO Environmental
    1.52x 19.66x $176.7M $36M
  • Which has Higher Returns LMB or DCI?

    Donaldson has a net margin of 6.85% compared to Limbach Holdings's net margin of 11.02%. Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 22.87% beat Donaldson's return on equity of 28.11%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LMB
    Limbach Holdings
    30.33% $0.82 $163.1M
    DCI
    Donaldson
    35.16% $0.79 $2.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About LMB or DCI?

    Limbach Holdings has a consensus price target of $107.00, signalling upside risk potential of 3.55%. On the other hand Donaldson has an analysts' consensus of $70.50 which suggests that it could grow by 5.28%. Given that Donaldson has higher upside potential than Limbach Holdings, analysts believe Donaldson is more attractive than Limbach Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LMB
    Limbach Holdings
    2 0 0
    DCI
    Donaldson
    1 6 1
  • Is LMB or DCI More Risky?

    Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.080, which suggesting that the stock is 7.953% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Donaldson has a beta of 1.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.66900000000001%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LMB or DCI?

    Limbach Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Donaldson offers a yield of 1.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Limbach Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson pays out 29.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LMB or DCI?

    Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues are $143.7M, which are smaller than Donaldson quarterly revenues of $870M. Limbach Holdings's net income of $9.8M is lower than Donaldson's net income of $95.9M. Notably, Limbach Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.05x while Donaldson's PE ratio is 19.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Limbach Holdings is 2.39x versus 2.24x for Donaldson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LMB
    Limbach Holdings
    2.39x 40.05x $143.7M $9.8M
    DCI
    Donaldson
    2.24x 19.49x $870M $95.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns LMB or FTEK?

    Fuel Tech has a net margin of 6.85% compared to Limbach Holdings's net margin of -35.64%. Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 22.87% beat Fuel Tech's return on equity of -4.48%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LMB
    Limbach Holdings
    30.33% $0.82 $163.1M
    FTEK
    Fuel Tech
    42.31% -$0.06 $42M
  • What do Analysts Say About LMB or FTEK?

    Limbach Holdings has a consensus price target of $107.00, signalling upside risk potential of 3.55%. On the other hand Fuel Tech has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 312.71%. Given that Fuel Tech has higher upside potential than Limbach Holdings, analysts believe Fuel Tech is more attractive than Limbach Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LMB
    Limbach Holdings
    2 0 0
    FTEK
    Fuel Tech
    0 0 0
  • Is LMB or FTEK More Risky?

    Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.080, which suggesting that the stock is 7.953% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fuel Tech has a beta of 4.384, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 338.367%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LMB or FTEK?

    Limbach Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fuel Tech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Limbach Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fuel Tech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LMB or FTEK?

    Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues are $143.7M, which are larger than Fuel Tech quarterly revenues of $5.3M. Limbach Holdings's net income of $9.8M is higher than Fuel Tech's net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Limbach Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.05x while Fuel Tech's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Limbach Holdings is 2.39x versus 1.18x for Fuel Tech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LMB
    Limbach Holdings
    2.39x 40.05x $143.7M $9.8M
    FTEK
    Fuel Tech
    1.18x -- $5.3M -$1.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns LMB or LII?

    Lennox International has a net margin of 6.85% compared to Limbach Holdings's net margin of 11.22%. Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 22.87% beat Lennox International's return on equity of 117.97%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LMB
    Limbach Holdings
    30.33% $0.82 $163.1M
    LII
    Lennox International
    30.63% $3.37 $1.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About LMB or LII?

    Limbach Holdings has a consensus price target of $107.00, signalling upside risk potential of 3.55%. On the other hand Lennox International has an analysts' consensus of $545.28 which suggests that it could fall by -3.13%. Given that Limbach Holdings has higher upside potential than Lennox International, analysts believe Limbach Holdings is more attractive than Lennox International.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LMB
    Limbach Holdings
    2 0 0
    LII
    Lennox International
    4 8 4
  • Is LMB or LII More Risky?

    Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.080, which suggesting that the stock is 7.953% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lennox International has a beta of 1.182, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.168%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LMB or LII?

    Limbach Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lennox International offers a yield of 0.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. Limbach Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lennox International pays out 19.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Lennox International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LMB or LII?

    Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues are $143.7M, which are smaller than Lennox International quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Limbach Holdings's net income of $9.8M is lower than Lennox International's net income of $120.3M. Notably, Limbach Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.05x while Lennox International's PE ratio is 25.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Limbach Holdings is 2.39x versus 3.75x for Lennox International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LMB
    Limbach Holdings
    2.39x 40.05x $143.7M $9.8M
    LII
    Lennox International
    3.75x 25.09x $1.1B $120.3M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Berkshire The Best Stock to Buy in a Bad Market?
Is Berkshire The Best Stock to Buy in a Bad Market?

Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A, BRK.B) has historically been one of the…

Is Shopify Stock Still a Buy in 2025 or Has Growth Peaked?
Is Shopify Stock Still a Buy in 2025 or Has Growth Peaked?

The big picture trends in e‑commerce sales are clearly in…

Is RTX The Best Growth Stock?
Is RTX The Best Growth Stock?

Among the worldwide aerospace and defense markets, the US controls…

Stock Ideas

Buy
71
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Buy
63
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Alerts

Buy
60
RGC alert for May 6

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 41.47% over the past day.

Buy
63
SKX alert for May 6

Skechers USA [SKX] is down 0.03% over the past day.

Sell
20
PTCT alert for May 6

PTC Therapeutics [PTCT] is down 2.12% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock