KRMN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CPI Aerostructures has a net margin of -- compared to Karman Holdings's net margin of 3.86%. Karman Holdings's return on equity of -- beat CPI Aerostructures's return on equity of 84.62%.

Karman Holdings has a consensus price target of $39.50, signalling upside risk potential of 4.25%. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.94%. Given that CPI Aerostructures has higher upside potential than Karman Holdings, analysts believe CPI Aerostructures is more attractive than Karman Holdings.

Karman Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures has a beta of 1.196, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.609%.

Karman Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CPI Aerostructures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Karman Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Karman Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CPI Aerostructures quarterly revenues of $19.4M. Karman Holdings's net income of -- is lower than CPI Aerostructures's net income of $749.7K. Notably, Karman Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CPI Aerostructures's PE ratio is 13.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Karman Holdings is -- versus 0.54x for CPI Aerostructures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of -- compared to Karman Holdings's net margin of 7.56%. Karman Holdings's return on equity of -- beat RTX's return on equity of 7.4%.

Karman Holdings has a consensus price target of $39.50, signalling upside risk potential of 4.25%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $137.93 which suggests that it could grow by 5.93%. Given that RTX has higher upside potential than Karman Holdings, analysts believe RTX is more attractive than Karman Holdings.

Karman Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.604, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.563%.

Karman Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RTX offers a yield of 1.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Karman Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Karman Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $20.3B. Karman Holdings's net income of -- is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Karman Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while RTX's PE ratio is 38.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Karman Holdings is -- versus 2.15x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Servotronics has a net margin of -- compared to Karman Holdings's net margin of -13.31%. Karman Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Servotronics's return on equity of -6.68%.

Karman Holdings has a consensus price target of $39.50, signalling upside risk potential of 4.25%. On the other hand Servotronics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Karman Holdings has higher upside potential than Servotronics, analysts believe Karman Holdings is more attractive than Servotronics.

Karman Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Servotronics has a beta of 0.265, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.456%.

Karman Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Servotronics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Karman Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Servotronics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Karman Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Servotronics quarterly revenues of $9.8M. Karman Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Servotronics's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Karman Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Servotronics's PE ratio is 211.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Karman Holdings is -- versus 0.61x for Servotronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TransDigm Group has a net margin of -- compared to Karman Holdings's net margin of 24.58%. Karman Holdings's return on equity of -- beat TransDigm Group's return on equity of --.

Karman Holdings has a consensus price target of $39.50, signalling upside risk potential of 4.25%. On the other hand TransDigm Group has an analysts' consensus of $1,482.82 which suggests that it could grow by 2.24%. Given that Karman Holdings has higher upside potential than TransDigm Group, analysts believe Karman Holdings is more attractive than TransDigm Group.

Karman Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TransDigm Group has a beta of 1.096, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.586%.

Karman Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TransDigm Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $75.00 per share. Karman Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TransDigm Group pays out 118.9% of its earnings as a dividend.

Karman Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TransDigm Group quarterly revenues of $2B. Karman Holdings's net income of -- is lower than TransDigm Group's net income of $493M. Notably, Karman Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TransDigm Group's PE ratio is 51.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Karman Holdings is -- versus 10.30x for TransDigm Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.