KRMN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CPI Aerostructures has a net margin of -4.79% compared to Karman Holdings's net margin of 3.86%. Karman Holdings's return on equity of 1.61% beat CPI Aerostructures's return on equity of 84.62%.

Karman Holdings has a consensus price target of $46.38, signalling upside risk potential of 4.64%. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 31.58%. Given that CPI Aerostructures has higher upside potential than Karman Holdings, analysts believe CPI Aerostructures is more attractive than Karman Holdings.

Karman Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures has a beta of 1.196, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.609%.

Karman Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CPI Aerostructures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Karman Holdings pays 1.23% of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Karman Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Karman Holdings quarterly revenues are $100.1M, which are larger than CPI Aerostructures quarterly revenues of $19.4M. Karman Holdings's net income of -$4.8M is lower than CPI Aerostructures's net income of $749.7K. Notably, Karman Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 1,594.07x while CPI Aerostructures's PE ratio is 12.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Karman Holdings is 16.15x versus 0.48x for CPI Aerostructures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of -4.79% compared to Karman Holdings's net margin of 7.56%. Karman Holdings's return on equity of 1.61% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.4%.

Karman Holdings has a consensus price target of $46.38, signalling upside risk potential of 4.64%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $138.02 which suggests that it could grow by 0.6%. Given that Karman Holdings has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe Karman Holdings is more attractive than RTX.

Karman Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.604, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.563%.

Karman Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RTX offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Karman Holdings pays 1.23% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Karman Holdings quarterly revenues are $100.1M, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $20.3B. Karman Holdings's net income of -$4.8M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Karman Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 1,594.07x while RTX's PE ratio is 40.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Karman Holdings is 16.15x versus 2.26x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Servotronics has a net margin of -4.79% compared to Karman Holdings's net margin of 1.09%. Karman Holdings's return on equity of 1.61% beat Servotronics's return on equity of -4.61%.

Karman Holdings has a consensus price target of $46.38, signalling upside risk potential of 4.64%. On the other hand Servotronics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Karman Holdings has higher upside potential than Servotronics, analysts believe Karman Holdings is more attractive than Servotronics.

Karman Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Servotronics has a beta of 0.265, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.456%.

Karman Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Servotronics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Karman Holdings pays 1.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Servotronics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Karman Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Karman Holdings quarterly revenues are $100.1M, which are larger than Servotronics quarterly revenues of $11.7M. Karman Holdings's net income of -$4.8M is lower than Servotronics's net income of $128K. Notably, Karman Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 1,594.07x while Servotronics's PE ratio is 211.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Karman Holdings is 16.15x versus 2.08x for Servotronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TransDigm Group has a net margin of -4.79% compared to Karman Holdings's net margin of 22.28%. Karman Holdings's return on equity of 1.61% beat TransDigm Group's return on equity of --.

Karman Holdings has a consensus price target of $46.38, signalling upside risk potential of 4.64%. On the other hand TransDigm Group has an analysts' consensus of $1,521.32 which suggests that it could grow by 5.65%. Given that TransDigm Group has higher upside potential than Karman Holdings, analysts believe TransDigm Group is more attractive than Karman Holdings.

Karman Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TransDigm Group has a beta of 1.096, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.586%.

Karman Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TransDigm Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $75.00 per share. Karman Holdings pays 1.23% of its earnings as a dividend. TransDigm Group pays out 118.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Karman Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but TransDigm Group's is not.

Karman Holdings quarterly revenues are $100.1M, which are smaller than TransDigm Group quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Karman Holdings's net income of -$4.8M is lower than TransDigm Group's net income of $479M. Notably, Karman Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 1,594.07x while TransDigm Group's PE ratio is 48.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Karman Holdings is 16.15x versus 9.96x for TransDigm Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.