KNTK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dorian LPG has a net margin of 4.35% compared to Kinetik Holdings's net margin of 10.66%. Kinetik Holdings's return on equity of 7.77% beat Dorian LPG's return on equity of 8.43%.

Kinetik Holdings has a consensus price target of $53.78, signalling upside risk potential of 18.05%. On the other hand Dorian LPG has an analysts' consensus of $31.00 which suggests that it could grow by 43.65%. Given that Dorian LPG has higher upside potential than Kinetik Holdings, analysts believe Dorian LPG is more attractive than Kinetik Holdings.

Kinetik Holdings has a beta of 3.031, which suggesting that the stock is 203.074% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dorian LPG has a beta of 0.803, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.705%.

Kinetik Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.78%. Dorian LPG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Kinetik Holdings pays 71.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Dorian LPG pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kinetik Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kinetik Holdings quarterly revenues are $443.3M, which are larger than Dorian LPG quarterly revenues of $75.9M. Kinetik Holdings's net income of $19.3M is higher than Dorian LPG's net income of $8.1M. Notably, Kinetik Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.96x while Dorian LPG's PE ratio is 9.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinetik Holdings is 1.74x versus 2.58x for Dorian LPG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plains All American Pipeline LP has a net margin of 4.35% compared to Kinetik Holdings's net margin of 3.69%. Kinetik Holdings's return on equity of 7.77% beat Plains All American Pipeline LP's return on equity of 7.11%.

Kinetik Holdings has a consensus price target of $53.78, signalling upside risk potential of 18.05%. On the other hand Plains All American Pipeline LP has an analysts' consensus of $20.92 which suggests that it could grow by 25.27%. Given that Plains All American Pipeline LP has higher upside potential than Kinetik Holdings, analysts believe Plains All American Pipeline LP is more attractive than Kinetik Holdings.

Kinetik Holdings has a beta of 3.031, which suggesting that the stock is 203.074% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plains All American Pipeline LP has a beta of 0.703, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.659%.

Kinetik Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.78%. Plains All American Pipeline LP offers a yield of 8.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Kinetik Holdings pays 71.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Plains All American Pipeline LP pays out 148.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinetik Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Plains All American Pipeline LP's is not.

Kinetik Holdings quarterly revenues are $443.3M, which are smaller than Plains All American Pipeline LP quarterly revenues of $12B. Kinetik Holdings's net income of $19.3M is lower than Plains All American Pipeline LP's net income of $443M. Notably, Kinetik Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.96x while Plains All American Pipeline LP's PE ratio is 17.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinetik Holdings is 1.74x versus 0.23x for Plains All American Pipeline LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Permian Basin Royalty Trust has a net margin of 4.35% compared to Kinetik Holdings's net margin of 84.53%. Kinetik Holdings's return on equity of 7.77% beat Permian Basin Royalty Trust's return on equity of 12224.88%.

Kinetik Holdings has a consensus price target of $53.78, signalling upside risk potential of 18.05%. On the other hand Permian Basin Royalty Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kinetik Holdings has higher upside potential than Permian Basin Royalty Trust, analysts believe Kinetik Holdings is more attractive than Permian Basin Royalty Trust.

Kinetik Holdings has a beta of 3.031, which suggesting that the stock is 203.074% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Permian Basin Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.559, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.142%.

Kinetik Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.78%. Permian Basin Royalty Trust offers a yield of 3.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Kinetik Holdings pays 71.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Permian Basin Royalty Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kinetik Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kinetik Holdings quarterly revenues are $443.3M, which are larger than Permian Basin Royalty Trust quarterly revenues of $3.1M. Kinetik Holdings's net income of $19.3M is higher than Permian Basin Royalty Trust's net income of $2.6M. Notably, Kinetik Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.96x while Permian Basin Royalty Trust's PE ratio is 23.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinetik Holdings is 1.74x versus 21.74x for Permian Basin Royalty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Titan NRG has a net margin of 4.35% compared to Kinetik Holdings's net margin of --. Kinetik Holdings's return on equity of 7.77% beat Titan NRG's return on equity of --.

Kinetik Holdings has a consensus price target of $53.78, signalling upside risk potential of 18.05%. On the other hand Titan NRG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kinetik Holdings has higher upside potential than Titan NRG, analysts believe Kinetik Holdings is more attractive than Titan NRG.

Kinetik Holdings has a beta of 3.031, which suggesting that the stock is 203.074% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Titan NRG has a beta of 1.204, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.396%.

Kinetik Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.78%. Titan NRG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kinetik Holdings pays 71.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Titan NRG pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kinetik Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kinetik Holdings quarterly revenues are $443.3M, which are larger than Titan NRG quarterly revenues of --. Kinetik Holdings's net income of $19.3M is higher than Titan NRG's net income of --. Notably, Kinetik Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.96x while Titan NRG's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinetik Holdings is 1.74x versus 0.31x for Titan NRG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.