INSW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dorian LPG has a net margin of 18.41% compared to International Seaways's net margin of 26.48%. International Seaways's return on equity of 22.82% beat Dorian LPG's return on equity of 15.26%.

International Seaways has a consensus price target of $52.86, signalling upside risk potential of 58.54%. On the other hand Dorian LPG has an analysts' consensus of $32.00 which suggests that it could grow by 54.37%. Given that International Seaways has higher upside potential than Dorian LPG, analysts believe International Seaways is more attractive than Dorian LPG.

International Seaways has a beta of -0.007, which suggesting that the stock is 100.707% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dorian LPG has a beta of 0.765, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.492%.

International Seaways has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. Dorian LPG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. International Seaways pays 68.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Dorian LPG pays out 52.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

International Seaways quarterly revenues are $194.6M, which are larger than Dorian LPG quarterly revenues of $80.7M. International Seaways's net income of $35.8M is higher than Dorian LPG's net income of $21.4M. Notably, International Seaways's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.97x while Dorian LPG's PE ratio is 5.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Seaways is 1.74x versus 2.07x for Dorian LPG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plains All American Pipeline LP has a net margin of 18.41% compared to International Seaways's net margin of 0.29%. International Seaways's return on equity of 22.82% beat Plains All American Pipeline LP's return on equity of 5.71%.

International Seaways has a consensus price target of $52.86, signalling upside risk potential of 58.54%. On the other hand Plains All American Pipeline LP has an analysts' consensus of $21.56 which suggests that it could grow by 21.51%. Given that International Seaways has higher upside potential than Plains All American Pipeline LP, analysts believe International Seaways is more attractive than Plains All American Pipeline LP.

International Seaways has a beta of -0.007, which suggesting that the stock is 100.707% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plains All American Pipeline LP has a beta of 1.167, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.704%.

International Seaways has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. Plains All American Pipeline LP offers a yield of 7.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. International Seaways pays 68.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Plains All American Pipeline LP pays out 148.32% of its earnings as a dividend. International Seaways's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Plains All American Pipeline LP's is not.

International Seaways quarterly revenues are $194.6M, which are smaller than Plains All American Pipeline LP quarterly revenues of $12.4B. International Seaways's net income of $35.8M is lower than Plains All American Pipeline LP's net income of $36M. Notably, International Seaways's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.97x while Plains All American Pipeline LP's PE ratio is 24.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Seaways is 1.74x versus 0.25x for Plains All American Pipeline LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Permian Basin Royalty Trust has a net margin of 18.41% compared to International Seaways's net margin of 89.97%. International Seaways's return on equity of 22.82% beat Permian Basin Royalty Trust's return on equity of 12983.51%.

International Seaways has a consensus price target of $52.86, signalling upside risk potential of 58.54%. On the other hand Permian Basin Royalty Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that International Seaways has higher upside potential than Permian Basin Royalty Trust, analysts believe International Seaways is more attractive than Permian Basin Royalty Trust.

International Seaways has a beta of -0.007, which suggesting that the stock is 100.707% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Permian Basin Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.578, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.228%.

International Seaways has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. Permian Basin Royalty Trust offers a yield of 4.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. International Seaways pays 68.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Permian Basin Royalty Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. International Seaways's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

International Seaways quarterly revenues are $194.6M, which are larger than Permian Basin Royalty Trust quarterly revenues of $3.8M. International Seaways's net income of $35.8M is higher than Permian Basin Royalty Trust's net income of $3.4M. Notably, International Seaways's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.97x while Permian Basin Royalty Trust's PE ratio is 18.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Seaways is 1.74x versus 16.85x for Permian Basin Royalty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Titan NRG has a net margin of 18.41% compared to International Seaways's net margin of --. International Seaways's return on equity of 22.82% beat Titan NRG's return on equity of --.

International Seaways has a consensus price target of $52.86, signalling upside risk potential of 58.54%. On the other hand Titan NRG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that International Seaways has higher upside potential than Titan NRG, analysts believe International Seaways is more attractive than Titan NRG.

International Seaways has a beta of -0.007, which suggesting that the stock is 100.707% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Titan NRG has a beta of 0.635, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.456%.

International Seaways has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. Titan NRG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Seaways pays 68.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Titan NRG pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. International Seaways's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

International Seaways quarterly revenues are $194.6M, which are larger than Titan NRG quarterly revenues of --. International Seaways's net income of $35.8M is higher than Titan NRG's net income of --. Notably, International Seaways's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.97x while Titan NRG's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Seaways is 1.74x versus 0.31x for Titan NRG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.