PAA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kinetik Holdings has a net margin of 0.29% compared to Plains All American Pipeline LP's net margin of 4.21%. Plains All American Pipeline LP's return on equity of 5.71% beat Kinetik Holdings's return on equity of 8.48%.

Plains All American Pipeline LP has a consensus price target of $21.82, signalling upside risk potential of 30.03%. On the other hand Kinetik Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $57.68 which suggests that it could grow by 36.14%. Given that Kinetik Holdings has higher upside potential than Plains All American Pipeline LP, analysts believe Kinetik Holdings is more attractive than Plains All American Pipeline LP.

Plains All American Pipeline LP has a beta of 1.167, which suggesting that the stock is 16.704% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinetik Holdings has a beta of 2.678, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 167.769%.

Plains All American Pipeline LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.94%. Kinetik Holdings offers a yield of 8.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. Plains All American Pipeline LP pays 148.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinetik Holdings pays out 71.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinetik Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Plains All American Pipeline LP's is not.

Plains All American Pipeline LP quarterly revenues are $12.4B, which are larger than Kinetik Holdings quarterly revenues of $385.7M. Plains All American Pipeline LP's net income of $36M is higher than Kinetik Holdings's net income of $16.2M. Notably, Plains All American Pipeline LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.99x while Kinetik Holdings's PE ratio is 41.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plains All American Pipeline LP is 0.24x versus 1.71x for Kinetik Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dorian LPG has a net margin of 0.29% compared to Plains All American Pipeline LP's net margin of 26.48%. Plains All American Pipeline LP's return on equity of 5.71% beat Dorian LPG's return on equity of 15.26%.

Plains All American Pipeline LP has a consensus price target of $21.82, signalling upside risk potential of 30.03%. On the other hand Dorian LPG has an analysts' consensus of $32.00 which suggests that it could grow by 55.79%. Given that Dorian LPG has higher upside potential than Plains All American Pipeline LP, analysts believe Dorian LPG is more attractive than Plains All American Pipeline LP.

Plains All American Pipeline LP has a beta of 1.167, which suggesting that the stock is 16.704% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dorian LPG has a beta of 0.765, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.492%.

Plains All American Pipeline LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.94%. Dorian LPG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Plains All American Pipeline LP pays 148.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Dorian LPG pays out 52.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Dorian LPG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Plains All American Pipeline LP's is not.

Plains All American Pipeline LP quarterly revenues are $12.4B, which are larger than Dorian LPG quarterly revenues of $80.7M. Plains All American Pipeline LP's net income of $36M is higher than Dorian LPG's net income of $21.4M. Notably, Plains All American Pipeline LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.99x while Dorian LPG's PE ratio is 5.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plains All American Pipeline LP is 0.24x versus 2.05x for Dorian LPG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plains GP Holdings LP has a net margin of 0.29% compared to Plains All American Pipeline LP's net margin of -0.09%. Plains All American Pipeline LP's return on equity of 5.71% beat Plains GP Holdings LP's return on equity of 0.7%.

Plains All American Pipeline LP has a consensus price target of $21.82, signalling upside risk potential of 30.03%. On the other hand Plains GP Holdings LP has an analysts' consensus of $22.14 which suggests that it could grow by 23.91%. Given that Plains All American Pipeline LP has higher upside potential than Plains GP Holdings LP, analysts believe Plains All American Pipeline LP is more attractive than Plains GP Holdings LP.

Plains All American Pipeline LP has a beta of 1.167, which suggesting that the stock is 16.704% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plains GP Holdings LP has a beta of 1.113, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.27%.

Plains All American Pipeline LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.94%. Plains GP Holdings LP offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Plains All American Pipeline LP pays 148.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Plains GP Holdings LP pays out 243.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Plains All American Pipeline LP quarterly revenues are $12.4B, which are smaller than Plains GP Holdings LP quarterly revenues of $12.4B. Plains All American Pipeline LP's net income of $36M is higher than Plains GP Holdings LP's net income of -$11M. Notably, Plains All American Pipeline LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.99x while Plains GP Holdings LP's PE ratio is 33.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plains All American Pipeline LP is 0.24x versus 0.07x for Plains GP Holdings LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Permian Basin Royalty Trust has a net margin of 0.29% compared to Plains All American Pipeline LP's net margin of 89.97%. Plains All American Pipeline LP's return on equity of 5.71% beat Permian Basin Royalty Trust's return on equity of 12983.51%.

Plains All American Pipeline LP has a consensus price target of $21.82, signalling upside risk potential of 30.03%. On the other hand Permian Basin Royalty Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Plains All American Pipeline LP has higher upside potential than Permian Basin Royalty Trust, analysts believe Plains All American Pipeline LP is more attractive than Permian Basin Royalty Trust.

Plains All American Pipeline LP has a beta of 1.167, which suggesting that the stock is 16.704% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Permian Basin Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.578, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.228%.

Plains All American Pipeline LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.94%. Permian Basin Royalty Trust offers a yield of 5.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Plains All American Pipeline LP pays 148.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Permian Basin Royalty Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Plains All American Pipeline LP quarterly revenues are $12.4B, which are larger than Permian Basin Royalty Trust quarterly revenues of $3.8M. Plains All American Pipeline LP's net income of $36M is higher than Permian Basin Royalty Trust's net income of $3.4M. Notably, Plains All American Pipeline LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.99x while Permian Basin Royalty Trust's PE ratio is 17.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plains All American Pipeline LP is 0.24x versus 16.57x for Permian Basin Royalty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.