GHLD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

KYN Capital Group has a net margin of -11.74% compared to Guild Holdings's net margin of --. Guild Holdings's return on equity of 3.7% beat KYN Capital Group's return on equity of --.

Guild Holdings has a consensus price target of $15.57, signalling upside risk potential of 9.81%. On the other hand KYN Capital Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guild Holdings has higher upside potential than KYN Capital Group, analysts believe Guild Holdings is more attractive than KYN Capital Group.

Guild Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KYN Capital Group has a beta of 3.487, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 248.715%.

Guild Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KYN Capital Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Guild Holdings pays 31.61% of its earnings as a dividend. KYN Capital Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Guild Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Guild Holdings quarterly revenues are $203.6M, which are larger than KYN Capital Group quarterly revenues of --. Guild Holdings's net income of -$23.9M is higher than KYN Capital Group's net income of --. Notably, Guild Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.55x while KYN Capital Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guild Holdings is 0.86x versus -- for KYN Capital Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Runway Growth Finance has a net margin of -11.74% compared to Guild Holdings's net margin of 38.65%. Guild Holdings's return on equity of 3.7% beat Runway Growth Finance's return on equity of 12.38%.

Guild Holdings has a consensus price target of $15.57, signalling upside risk potential of 9.81%. On the other hand Runway Growth Finance has an analysts' consensus of $10.94 which suggests that it could grow by 11.79%. Given that Runway Growth Finance has higher upside potential than Guild Holdings, analysts believe Runway Growth Finance is more attractive than Guild Holdings.

Guild Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Runway Growth Finance has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Guild Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Runway Growth Finance offers a yield of 14.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Guild Holdings pays 31.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Runway Growth Finance pays out 94.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Guild Holdings quarterly revenues are $203.6M, which are larger than Runway Growth Finance quarterly revenues of $4.8M. Guild Holdings's net income of -$23.9M is lower than Runway Growth Finance's net income of $1.9M. Notably, Guild Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.55x while Runway Growth Finance's PE ratio is 5.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guild Holdings is 0.86x versus 4.99x for Runway Growth Finance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Security National Financial has a net margin of -11.74% compared to Guild Holdings's net margin of 5.23%. Guild Holdings's return on equity of 3.7% beat Security National Financial's return on equity of 6.98%.

Guild Holdings has a consensus price target of $15.57, signalling upside risk potential of 9.81%. On the other hand Security National Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guild Holdings has higher upside potential than Security National Financial, analysts believe Guild Holdings is more attractive than Security National Financial.

Guild Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Security National Financial has a beta of 0.881, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.91%.

Guild Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Security National Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Guild Holdings pays 31.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Security National Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Guild Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Guild Holdings quarterly revenues are $203.6M, which are larger than Security National Financial quarterly revenues of $82.9M. Guild Holdings's net income of -$23.9M is lower than Security National Financial's net income of $4.3M. Notably, Guild Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.55x while Security National Financial's PE ratio is 10.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guild Holdings is 0.86x versus 0.70x for Security National Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SoFi Technologies has a net margin of -11.74% compared to Guild Holdings's net margin of 9.22%. Guild Holdings's return on equity of 3.7% beat SoFi Technologies's return on equity of 7.68%.

Guild Holdings has a consensus price target of $15.57, signalling upside risk potential of 9.81%. On the other hand SoFi Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $14.13 which suggests that it could grow by 6.06%. Given that Guild Holdings has higher upside potential than SoFi Technologies, analysts believe Guild Holdings is more attractive than SoFi Technologies.

Guild Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SoFi Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Guild Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SoFi Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Guild Holdings pays 31.61% of its earnings as a dividend. SoFi Technologies pays out 3.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Guild Holdings quarterly revenues are $203.6M, which are smaller than SoFi Technologies quarterly revenues of $771.8M. Guild Holdings's net income of -$23.9M is lower than SoFi Technologies's net income of $71.1M. Notably, Guild Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.55x while SoFi Technologies's PE ratio is 32.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guild Holdings is 0.86x versus 5.39x for SoFi Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.