RWAY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Graystone has a net margin of 89.66% compared to Runway Growth Finance's net margin of --. Runway Growth Finance's return on equity of 7.63% beat The Graystone's return on equity of --.

Runway Growth Finance has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.26%. On the other hand The Graystone has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Runway Growth Finance has higher upside potential than The Graystone, analysts believe Runway Growth Finance is more attractive than The Graystone.

Runway Growth Finance has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Graystone has a beta of 0.841, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.884%.

Runway Growth Finance has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 16.61%. The Graystone offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Runway Growth Finance pays 165.36% of its earnings as a dividend. The Graystone pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Runway Growth Finance quarterly revenues are $27.9M, which are larger than The Graystone quarterly revenues of --. Runway Growth Finance's net income of $25M is higher than The Graystone's net income of --. Notably, Runway Growth Finance's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.37x while The Graystone's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Runway Growth Finance is 7.96x versus 0.00x for The Graystone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Income Opportunity Realty Investors has a net margin of 89.66% compared to Runway Growth Finance's net margin of 74.23%. Runway Growth Finance's return on equity of 7.63% beat Income Opportunity Realty Investors's return on equity of 5.06%.

Runway Growth Finance has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.26%. On the other hand Income Opportunity Realty Investors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Runway Growth Finance has higher upside potential than Income Opportunity Realty Investors, analysts believe Runway Growth Finance is more attractive than Income Opportunity Realty Investors.

Runway Growth Finance has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Income Opportunity Realty Investors has a beta of 0.199, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.103%.

Runway Growth Finance has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 16.61%. Income Opportunity Realty Investors offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Runway Growth Finance pays 165.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Income Opportunity Realty Investors pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Runway Growth Finance quarterly revenues are $27.9M, which are larger than Income Opportunity Realty Investors quarterly revenues of $1.6M. Runway Growth Finance's net income of $25M is higher than Income Opportunity Realty Investors's net income of $1.2M. Notably, Runway Growth Finance's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.37x while Income Opportunity Realty Investors's PE ratio is 12.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Runway Growth Finance is 7.96x versus 9.51x for Income Opportunity Realty Investors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Security National Financial has a net margin of 89.66% compared to Runway Growth Finance's net margin of 13.37%. Runway Growth Finance's return on equity of 7.63% beat Security National Financial's return on equity of 9.18%.

Runway Growth Finance has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.26%. On the other hand Security National Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Runway Growth Finance has higher upside potential than Security National Financial, analysts believe Runway Growth Finance is more attractive than Security National Financial.

Runway Growth Finance has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Security National Financial has a beta of 1.086, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.557%.

Runway Growth Finance has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 16.61%. Security National Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Runway Growth Finance pays 165.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Security National Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Runway Growth Finance quarterly revenues are $27.9M, which are smaller than Security National Financial quarterly revenues of $88.5M. Runway Growth Finance's net income of $25M is higher than Security National Financial's net income of $11.8M. Notably, Runway Growth Finance's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.37x while Security National Financial's PE ratio is 9.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Runway Growth Finance is 7.96x versus 0.85x for Security National Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SoFi Technologies has a net margin of 89.66% compared to Runway Growth Finance's net margin of 8.76%. Runway Growth Finance's return on equity of 7.63% beat SoFi Technologies's return on equity of 3.68%.

Runway Growth Finance has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.26%. On the other hand SoFi Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $11.37 which suggests that it could fall by -29.05%. Given that Runway Growth Finance has higher upside potential than SoFi Technologies, analysts believe Runway Growth Finance is more attractive than SoFi Technologies.

Runway Growth Finance has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SoFi Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Runway Growth Finance has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 16.61%. SoFi Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Runway Growth Finance pays 165.36% of its earnings as a dividend. SoFi Technologies pays out -13.44% of its earnings as a dividend.

Runway Growth Finance quarterly revenues are $27.9M, which are smaller than SoFi Technologies quarterly revenues of $693.8M. Runway Growth Finance's net income of $25M is lower than SoFi Technologies's net income of $60.7M. Notably, Runway Growth Finance's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.37x while SoFi Technologies's PE ratio is 160.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Runway Growth Finance is 7.96x versus 6.74x for SoFi Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.