CPF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Eagle Bancorp has a net margin of 19.61% compared to Central Pacific Financial's net margin of 20.43%. Central Pacific Financial's return on equity of 10.23% beat Eagle Bancorp's return on equity of -3.82%.

Central Pacific Financial has a consensus price target of $32.00, signalling upside risk potential of 26.53%. On the other hand Eagle Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $25.17 which suggests that it could grow by 25.4%. Given that Central Pacific Financial has higher upside potential than Eagle Bancorp, analysts believe Central Pacific Financial is more attractive than Eagle Bancorp.

Central Pacific Financial has a beta of 0.984, which suggesting that the stock is 1.572% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eagle Bancorp has a beta of 1.046, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.626%.

Central Pacific Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.15%. Eagle Bancorp offers a yield of 6.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Central Pacific Financial pays 52.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Eagle Bancorp pays out -96.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Central Pacific Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Central Pacific Financial quarterly revenues are $57.9M, which are smaller than Eagle Bancorp quarterly revenues of $74.9M. Central Pacific Financial's net income of $11.3M is lower than Eagle Bancorp's net income of $15.3M. Notably, Central Pacific Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.84x while Eagle Bancorp's PE ratio is 7.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Central Pacific Financial is 2.79x versus 1.96x for Eagle Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

First Bancorp has a net margin of 19.61% compared to Central Pacific Financial's net margin of 5.57%. Central Pacific Financial's return on equity of 10.23% beat First Bancorp's return on equity of 5.39%.

Central Pacific Financial has a consensus price target of $32.00, signalling upside risk potential of 26.53%. On the other hand First Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $49.33 which suggests that it could grow by 33.15%. Given that First Bancorp has higher upside potential than Central Pacific Financial, analysts believe First Bancorp is more attractive than Central Pacific Financial.

Central Pacific Financial has a beta of 0.984, which suggesting that the stock is 1.572% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Bancorp has a beta of 0.888, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.152%.

Central Pacific Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.15%. First Bancorp offers a yield of 2.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Central Pacific Financial pays 52.69% of its earnings as a dividend. First Bancorp pays out 47.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Central Pacific Financial quarterly revenues are $57.9M, which are smaller than First Bancorp quarterly revenues of $63.8M. Central Pacific Financial's net income of $11.3M is higher than First Bancorp's net income of $3.6M. Notably, Central Pacific Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.84x while First Bancorp's PE ratio is 20.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Central Pacific Financial is 2.79x versus 4.42x for First Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Independent Bank has a net margin of 19.61% compared to Central Pacific Financial's net margin of 24.95%. Central Pacific Financial's return on equity of 10.23% beat Independent Bank's return on equity of 6.37%.

Central Pacific Financial has a consensus price target of $32.00, signalling upside risk potential of 26.53%. On the other hand Independent Bank has an analysts' consensus of $73.50 which suggests that it could grow by 34.57%. Given that Independent Bank has higher upside potential than Central Pacific Financial, analysts believe Independent Bank is more attractive than Central Pacific Financial.

Central Pacific Financial has a beta of 0.984, which suggesting that the stock is 1.572% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Independent Bank has a beta of 0.841, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.869%.

Central Pacific Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.15%. Independent Bank offers a yield of 4.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Central Pacific Financial pays 52.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Independent Bank pays out 50.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Central Pacific Financial quarterly revenues are $57.9M, which are smaller than Independent Bank quarterly revenues of $178M. Central Pacific Financial's net income of $11.3M is lower than Independent Bank's net income of $44.4M. Notably, Central Pacific Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.84x while Independent Bank's PE ratio is 12.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Central Pacific Financial is 2.79x versus 3.34x for Independent Bank. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NBT Bancorp has a net margin of 19.61% compared to Central Pacific Financial's net margin of 24.35%. Central Pacific Financial's return on equity of 10.23% beat NBT Bancorp's return on equity of 9.53%.

Central Pacific Financial has a consensus price target of $32.00, signalling upside risk potential of 26.53%. On the other hand NBT Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $51.40 which suggests that it could grow by 29.67%. Given that NBT Bancorp has higher upside potential than Central Pacific Financial, analysts believe NBT Bancorp is more attractive than Central Pacific Financial.

Central Pacific Financial has a beta of 0.984, which suggesting that the stock is 1.572% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NBT Bancorp has a beta of 0.530, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.98%.

Central Pacific Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.15%. NBT Bancorp offers a yield of 3.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Central Pacific Financial pays 52.69% of its earnings as a dividend. NBT Bancorp pays out 44.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Central Pacific Financial quarterly revenues are $57.9M, which are smaller than NBT Bancorp quarterly revenues of $147.9M. Central Pacific Financial's net income of $11.3M is lower than NBT Bancorp's net income of $36M. Notably, Central Pacific Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.84x while NBT Bancorp's PE ratio is 13.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Central Pacific Financial is 2.79x versus 3.27x for NBT Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.