COLB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Citizens Financial Group has a net margin of 29.45% compared to Columbia Banking System's net margin of 20.07%. Columbia Banking System's return on equity of 9.74% beat Citizens Financial Group's return on equity of 5.41%.

Columbia Banking System has a consensus price target of $32.83, signalling upside risk potential of 22.49%. On the other hand Citizens Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $50.06 which suggests that it could grow by 16.97%. Given that Columbia Banking System has higher upside potential than Citizens Financial Group, analysts believe Columbia Banking System is more attractive than Citizens Financial Group.

Columbia Banking System has a beta of 0.644, which suggesting that the stock is 35.624% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citizens Financial Group has a beta of 1.336, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.623%.

Columbia Banking System has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.33%. Citizens Financial Group offers a yield of 3.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Columbia Banking System pays 77.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Citizens Financial Group pays out 57.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Columbia Banking System quarterly revenues are $496.4M, which are smaller than Citizens Financial Group quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Columbia Banking System's net income of $146.2M is lower than Citizens Financial Group's net income of $382M. Notably, Columbia Banking System's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.70x while Citizens Financial Group's PE ratio is 17.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbia Banking System is 2.88x versus 2.58x for Citizens Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Bank OZK has a net margin of 29.45% compared to Columbia Banking System's net margin of 42.84%. Columbia Banking System's return on equity of 9.74% beat Bank OZK's return on equity of 13.48%.

Columbia Banking System has a consensus price target of $32.83, signalling upside risk potential of 22.49%. On the other hand Bank OZK has an analysts' consensus of $52.25 which suggests that it could grow by 17.52%. Given that Columbia Banking System has higher upside potential than Bank OZK, analysts believe Columbia Banking System is more attractive than Bank OZK.

Columbia Banking System has a beta of 0.644, which suggesting that the stock is 35.624% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bank OZK has a beta of 1.181, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.145%.

Columbia Banking System has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.33%. Bank OZK offers a yield of 3.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Columbia Banking System pays 77.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Bank OZK pays out 25.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Columbia Banking System quarterly revenues are $496.4M, which are larger than Bank OZK quarterly revenues of $423M. Columbia Banking System's net income of $146.2M is lower than Bank OZK's net income of $181.2M. Notably, Columbia Banking System's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.70x while Bank OZK's PE ratio is 7.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbia Banking System is 2.88x versus 3.06x for Bank OZK. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Penns Woods Bancorp has a net margin of 29.45% compared to Columbia Banking System's net margin of 27.47%. Columbia Banking System's return on equity of 9.74% beat Penns Woods Bancorp's return on equity of 10.18%.

Columbia Banking System has a consensus price target of $32.83, signalling upside risk potential of 22.49%. On the other hand Penns Woods Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Columbia Banking System has higher upside potential than Penns Woods Bancorp, analysts believe Columbia Banking System is more attractive than Penns Woods Bancorp.

Columbia Banking System has a beta of 0.644, which suggesting that the stock is 35.624% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Penns Woods Bancorp has a beta of 0.482, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.813%.

Columbia Banking System has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.33%. Penns Woods Bancorp offers a yield of 4.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Columbia Banking System pays 77.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Penns Woods Bancorp pays out 55.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Columbia Banking System quarterly revenues are $496.4M, which are larger than Penns Woods Bancorp quarterly revenues of $17.5M. Columbia Banking System's net income of $146.2M is higher than Penns Woods Bancorp's net income of $4.8M. Notably, Columbia Banking System's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.70x while Penns Woods Bancorp's PE ratio is 11.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbia Banking System is 2.88x versus 3.38x for Penns Woods Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valley National Bancorp has a net margin of 29.45% compared to Columbia Banking System's net margin of 21.1%. Columbia Banking System's return on equity of 9.74% beat Valley National Bancorp's return on equity of 4.98%.

Columbia Banking System has a consensus price target of $32.83, signalling upside risk potential of 22.49%. On the other hand Valley National Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $11.15 which suggests that it could grow by 22.81%. Given that Valley National Bancorp has higher upside potential than Columbia Banking System, analysts believe Valley National Bancorp is more attractive than Columbia Banking System.

Columbia Banking System has a beta of 0.644, which suggesting that the stock is 35.624% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valley National Bancorp has a beta of 1.090, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.961%.

Columbia Banking System has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.33%. Valley National Bancorp offers a yield of 4.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Columbia Banking System pays 77.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Valley National Bancorp pays out 48.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Columbia Banking System quarterly revenues are $496.4M, which are larger than Valley National Bancorp quarterly revenues of $463.8M. Columbia Banking System's net income of $146.2M is higher than Valley National Bancorp's net income of $97.9M. Notably, Columbia Banking System's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.70x while Valley National Bancorp's PE ratio is 14.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbia Banking System is 2.88x versus 2.56x for Valley National Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.