BTI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Imperial Brands PLC has a net margin of -- compared to British American Tobacco PLC's net margin of --. British American Tobacco PLC's return on equity of 5.79% beat Imperial Brands PLC's return on equity of 44.78%.

British American Tobacco PLC has a consensus price target of $40.96, signalling downside risk potential of -0.97%. On the other hand Imperial Brands PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -5.69%. Given that Imperial Brands PLC has more downside risk than British American Tobacco PLC, analysts believe British American Tobacco PLC is more attractive than Imperial Brands PLC.

British American Tobacco PLC has a beta of 0.499, which suggesting that the stock is 50.097% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Imperial Brands PLC has a beta of 0.597, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.289%.

British American Tobacco PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.23%. Imperial Brands PLC offers a yield of 5.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. British American Tobacco PLC pays 169.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Imperial Brands PLC pays out 49.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Imperial Brands PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but British American Tobacco PLC's is not.

British American Tobacco PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Imperial Brands PLC quarterly revenues of --. British American Tobacco PLC's net income of -- is lower than Imperial Brands PLC's net income of --. Notably, British American Tobacco PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.29x while Imperial Brands PLC's PE ratio is 9.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for British American Tobacco PLC is 2.80x versus 0.76x for Imperial Brands PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Philip Morris International has a net margin of -- compared to British American Tobacco PLC's net margin of -5.97%. British American Tobacco PLC's return on equity of 5.79% beat Philip Morris International's return on equity of --.

British American Tobacco PLC has a consensus price target of $40.96, signalling downside risk potential of -0.97%. On the other hand Philip Morris International has an analysts' consensus of $149.79 which suggests that it could fall by -1.38%. Given that Philip Morris International has more downside risk than British American Tobacco PLC, analysts believe British American Tobacco PLC is more attractive than Philip Morris International.

British American Tobacco PLC has a beta of 0.499, which suggesting that the stock is 50.097% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Philip Morris International has a beta of 0.527, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.259%.

British American Tobacco PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.23%. Philip Morris International offers a yield of 3.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share. British American Tobacco PLC pays 169.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Philip Morris International pays out 116.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

British American Tobacco PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Philip Morris International quarterly revenues of $9.7B. British American Tobacco PLC's net income of -- is lower than Philip Morris International's net income of -$579M. Notably, British American Tobacco PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.29x while Philip Morris International's PE ratio is 33.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for British American Tobacco PLC is 2.80x versus 6.24x for Philip Morris International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC has a net margin of -- compared to British American Tobacco PLC's net margin of --. British American Tobacco PLC's return on equity of 5.79% beat Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's return on equity of 18.38%.

British American Tobacco PLC has a consensus price target of $40.96, signalling downside risk potential of -0.97%. On the other hand Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that British American Tobacco PLC has higher upside potential than Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC, analysts believe British American Tobacco PLC is more attractive than Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC.

British American Tobacco PLC has a beta of 0.499, which suggesting that the stock is 50.097% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC has a beta of 0.406, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.441%.

British American Tobacco PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.23%. Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC offers a yield of 3.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. British American Tobacco PLC pays 169.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC pays out 96.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but British American Tobacco PLC's is not.

British American Tobacco PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC quarterly revenues of --. British American Tobacco PLC's net income of -- is lower than Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's net income of --. Notably, British American Tobacco PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.29x while Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's PE ratio is 25.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for British American Tobacco PLC is 2.80x versus 2.60x for Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unilever PLC has a net margin of -- compared to British American Tobacco PLC's net margin of --. British American Tobacco PLC's return on equity of 5.79% beat Unilever PLC's return on equity of 26%.

British American Tobacco PLC has a consensus price target of $40.96, signalling downside risk potential of -0.97%. On the other hand Unilever PLC has an analysts' consensus of $66.96 which suggests that it could grow by 14.36%. Given that Unilever PLC has higher upside potential than British American Tobacco PLC, analysts believe Unilever PLC is more attractive than British American Tobacco PLC.

British American Tobacco PLC has a beta of 0.499, which suggesting that the stock is 50.097% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unilever PLC has a beta of 0.468, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.158%.

British American Tobacco PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.23%. Unilever PLC offers a yield of 3.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. British American Tobacco PLC pays 169.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Unilever PLC pays out 75.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Unilever PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but British American Tobacco PLC's is not.

British American Tobacco PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Unilever PLC quarterly revenues of --. British American Tobacco PLC's net income of -- is lower than Unilever PLC's net income of --. Notably, British American Tobacco PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.29x while Unilever PLC's PE ratio is 23.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for British American Tobacco PLC is 2.80x versus 2.26x for Unilever PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.