Is the Market Going to Go Lower?
The last month has been extremely difficult for the stock…
Buy
57
UL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$58.76
Seasonality move
:
4.54%
Day range:
$59.36 - $59.97
52-week range:
$46.46 - $65.87
Dividend yield:
3.14%
P/E ratio:
24.31x
P/S ratio:
2.30x
P/B ratio:
7.09x
Volume:
2.3M
Avg. volume:
2.7M
1-year change:
22.03%
Market cap:
$147.4B
Revenue:
$65.8B
EPS (TTM):
$2.46
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
UL
Unilever PLC
|
$14.7B | -- | -- | -- | $66.96 |
|
BTI
British American Tobacco PLC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $40.96 |
|
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC
|
$5.3B | -- | -- | -- | $89.67 |
|
DEO
Diageo PLC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $126.71 |
|
RBGLY
Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TSCDY
Tesco PLC
|
$23.1B | -- | -- | -- | $14.40 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
UL
Unilever PLC
|
$59.72 | $66.96 | $147.4B | 24.31x | $0.47 | 3.14% | 2.30x |
|
BTI
British American Tobacco PLC
|
$41.84 | $40.96 | $91.9B | 24.57x | $0.73 | 7.15% | 2.83x |
|
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC
|
$84.74 | $89.67 | $39B | 25.66x | $1.30 | 2.47% | 1.78x |
|
DEO
Diageo PLC
|
$109.29 | $126.71 | $60.7B | 16.94x | $1.62 | 3.79% | 3.01x |
|
RBGLY
Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC
|
$13.49 | -- | $46.1B | 26.23x | $0.21 | 3.74% | 2.63x |
|
TSCDY
Tesco PLC
|
$12.81 | $14.40 | $28.6B | 20.10x | $0.16 | 3.68% | 0.34x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
UL
Unilever PLC
|
59.34% | 0.463 | 21.22% | 0.54x |
|
BTI
British American Tobacco PLC
|
42.28% | 1.245 | 56.73% | 0.38x |
|
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC
|
55.58% | 0.084 | 30.78% | 0.54x |
|
DEO
Diageo PLC
|
67.87% | 0.263 | 29.86% | 0.65x |
|
RBGLY
Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC
|
55.51% | 0.245 | 25.4% | 0.38x |
|
TSCDY
Tesco PLC
|
37.99% | 0.871 | 29% | 0.30x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
UL
Unilever PLC
|
-- | -- | 14.06% | 26% | -- | -- |
|
BTI
British American Tobacco PLC
|
-- | -- | 3.34% | 5.79% | -- | -- |
|
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC
|
-- | -- | 7.24% | 16.39% | -- | -- |
|
DEO
Diageo PLC
|
-- | -- | 10.69% | 29.79% | -- | -- |
|
RBGLY
Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC
|
-- | -- | 8.84% | 18.38% | -- | -- |
|
TSCDY
Tesco PLC
|
-- | -- | 6.83% | 11.13% | -- | -- |
Unilever PLC vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns UL or BTI?
British American Tobacco PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Unilever PLC's net margin of --. Unilever PLC's return on equity of 26% beat British American Tobacco PLC's return on equity of 5.79%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ULUnilever PLC-- -- $53.8B BTIBritish American Tobacco PLC-- -- $108.4B -
What do Analysts Say About UL or BTI?
Unilever PLC has a consensus price target of $66.96, signalling upside risk potential of 12.43%. On the other hand British American Tobacco PLC has an analysts' consensus of $40.96 which suggests that it could fall by -2.1%. Given that Unilever PLC has higher upside potential than British American Tobacco PLC, analysts believe Unilever PLC is more attractive than British American Tobacco PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ULUnilever PLC3 1 0 BTIBritish American Tobacco PLC0 2 1 -
Is UL or BTI More Risky?
Unilever PLC has a beta of 0.468, which suggesting that the stock is 53.158% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison British American Tobacco PLC has a beta of 0.499, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.097%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock UL or BTI?
Unilever PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.14%. British American Tobacco PLC offers a yield of 7.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share. Unilever PLC pays 75.19% of its earnings as a dividend. British American Tobacco PLC pays out 169.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Unilever PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but British American Tobacco PLC's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios UL or BTI?
Unilever PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than British American Tobacco PLC quarterly revenues of --. Unilever PLC's net income of -- is lower than British American Tobacco PLC's net income of --. Notably, Unilever PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.31x while British American Tobacco PLC's PE ratio is 24.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Unilever PLC is 2.30x versus 2.83x for British American Tobacco PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ULUnilever PLC2.30x 24.31x -- -- BTIBritish American Tobacco PLC2.83x 24.57x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns UL or CCEP?
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Unilever PLC's net margin of --. Unilever PLC's return on equity of 26% beat Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC's return on equity of 16.39%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ULUnilever PLC-- -- $53.8B CCEPCoca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC-- -- $20.4B -
What do Analysts Say About UL or CCEP?
Unilever PLC has a consensus price target of $66.96, signalling upside risk potential of 12.43%. On the other hand Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC has an analysts' consensus of $89.67 which suggests that it could grow by 5.82%. Given that Unilever PLC has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC, analysts believe Unilever PLC is more attractive than Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ULUnilever PLC3 1 0 CCEPCoca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC8 3 0 -
Is UL or CCEP More Risky?
Unilever PLC has a beta of 0.468, which suggesting that the stock is 53.158% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC has a beta of 0.922, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.778%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock UL or CCEP?
Unilever PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.14%. Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC offers a yield of 2.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share. Unilever PLC pays 75.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC pays out 64.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios UL or CCEP?
Unilever PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC quarterly revenues of --. Unilever PLC's net income of -- is lower than Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC's net income of --. Notably, Unilever PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.31x while Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC's PE ratio is 25.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Unilever PLC is 2.30x versus 1.78x for Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ULUnilever PLC2.30x 24.31x -- -- CCEPCoca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC1.78x 25.66x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns UL or DEO?
Diageo PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Unilever PLC's net margin of --. Unilever PLC's return on equity of 26% beat Diageo PLC's return on equity of 29.79%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ULUnilever PLC-- -- $53.8B DEODiageo PLC-- -- $34.1B -
What do Analysts Say About UL or DEO?
Unilever PLC has a consensus price target of $66.96, signalling upside risk potential of 12.43%. On the other hand Diageo PLC has an analysts' consensus of $126.71 which suggests that it could grow by 15.94%. Given that Diageo PLC has higher upside potential than Unilever PLC, analysts believe Diageo PLC is more attractive than Unilever PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ULUnilever PLC3 1 0 DEODiageo PLC3 2 1 -
Is UL or DEO More Risky?
Unilever PLC has a beta of 0.468, which suggesting that the stock is 53.158% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diageo PLC has a beta of 0.650, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.965%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock UL or DEO?
Unilever PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.14%. Diageo PLC offers a yield of 3.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share. Unilever PLC pays 75.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Diageo PLC pays out 57.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios UL or DEO?
Unilever PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Diageo PLC quarterly revenues of --. Unilever PLC's net income of -- is lower than Diageo PLC's net income of --. Notably, Unilever PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.31x while Diageo PLC's PE ratio is 16.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Unilever PLC is 2.30x versus 3.01x for Diageo PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ULUnilever PLC2.30x 24.31x -- -- DEODiageo PLC3.01x 16.94x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns UL or RBGLY?
Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Unilever PLC's net margin of --. Unilever PLC's return on equity of 26% beat Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's return on equity of 18.38%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ULUnilever PLC-- -- $53.8B RBGLYReckitt Benckiser Group PLC-- -- $18.9B -
What do Analysts Say About UL or RBGLY?
Unilever PLC has a consensus price target of $66.96, signalling upside risk potential of 12.43%. On the other hand Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Unilever PLC has higher upside potential than Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC, analysts believe Unilever PLC is more attractive than Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ULUnilever PLC3 1 0 RBGLYReckitt Benckiser Group PLC0 0 0 -
Is UL or RBGLY More Risky?
Unilever PLC has a beta of 0.468, which suggesting that the stock is 53.158% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC has a beta of 0.406, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.441%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock UL or RBGLY?
Unilever PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.14%. Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC offers a yield of 3.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Unilever PLC pays 75.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC pays out 96.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios UL or RBGLY?
Unilever PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC quarterly revenues of --. Unilever PLC's net income of -- is lower than Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's net income of --. Notably, Unilever PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.31x while Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC's PE ratio is 26.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Unilever PLC is 2.30x versus 2.63x for Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ULUnilever PLC2.30x 24.31x -- -- RBGLYReckitt Benckiser Group PLC2.63x 26.23x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns UL or TSCDY?
Tesco PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Unilever PLC's net margin of --. Unilever PLC's return on equity of 26% beat Tesco PLC's return on equity of 11.13%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ULUnilever PLC-- -- $53.8B TSCDYTesco PLC-- -- $24.5B -
What do Analysts Say About UL or TSCDY?
Unilever PLC has a consensus price target of $66.96, signalling upside risk potential of 12.43%. On the other hand Tesco PLC has an analysts' consensus of $14.40 which suggests that it could grow by 12.41%. Given that Unilever PLC has higher upside potential than Tesco PLC, analysts believe Unilever PLC is more attractive than Tesco PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ULUnilever PLC3 1 0 TSCDYTesco PLC0 1 0 -
Is UL or TSCDY More Risky?
Unilever PLC has a beta of 0.468, which suggesting that the stock is 53.158% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesco PLC has a beta of 0.710, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.04%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock UL or TSCDY?
Unilever PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.14%. Tesco PLC offers a yield of 3.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Unilever PLC pays 75.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesco PLC pays out 65.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios UL or TSCDY?
Unilever PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tesco PLC quarterly revenues of --. Unilever PLC's net income of -- is lower than Tesco PLC's net income of --. Notably, Unilever PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.31x while Tesco PLC's PE ratio is 20.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Unilever PLC is 2.30x versus 0.34x for Tesco PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ULUnilever PLC2.30x 24.31x -- -- TSCDYTesco PLC0.34x 20.10x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
2 Dividend Stocks to Buy in a Recession
While many economists and investors initially expected 2025 to be…
Is Ford Stock Undervalued Amid the EV Transition?
There is a lot going on in the electric vehicle…
Stock Ideas
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Buy
51
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Alerts
Buy
63
EXOD alert for Mar 18
Exodus Movement [EXOD] is down 3.96% over the past day.
Sell
45
MNPR alert for Mar 18
Monopar Therapeutics [MNPR] is up 0.93% over the past day.
Sell
47
CELH alert for Mar 18
Celsius Holdings [CELH] is up 1.44% over the past day.
