PM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coca-Cola has a net margin of -5.97% compared to Philip Morris International's net margin of 19.01%. Philip Morris International's return on equity of -- beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 38.7%.

Philip Morris International has a consensus price target of $149.79, signalling downside risk potential of -3.8%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $74.64 which suggests that it could grow by 6.44%. Given that Coca-Cola has higher upside potential than Philip Morris International, analysts believe Coca-Cola is more attractive than Philip Morris International.

Philip Morris International has a beta of 0.527, which suggesting that the stock is 47.259% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.571, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.943%.

Philip Morris International has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.4%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 2.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Philip Morris International pays 116.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Philip Morris International's is not.

Philip Morris International quarterly revenues are $9.7B, which are smaller than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.5B. Philip Morris International's net income of -$579M is lower than Coca-Cola's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Philip Morris International's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.53x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 28.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Philip Morris International is 6.40x versus 6.44x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Altria Group has a net margin of -5.97% compared to Philip Morris International's net margin of 59.52%. Philip Morris International's return on equity of -- beat Altria Group's return on equity of --.

Philip Morris International has a consensus price target of $149.79, signalling downside risk potential of -3.8%. On the other hand Altria Group has an analysts' consensus of $56.66 which suggests that it could fall by -3.8%. Given that Philip Morris International has more downside risk than Altria Group, analysts believe Altria Group is more attractive than Philip Morris International.

Philip Morris International has a beta of 0.527, which suggesting that the stock is 47.259% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Altria Group has a beta of 0.562, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.848%.

Philip Morris International has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.4%. Altria Group offers a yield of 6.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share. Philip Morris International pays 116.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Altria Group pays out 60.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Altria Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Philip Morris International's is not.

Philip Morris International quarterly revenues are $9.7B, which are larger than Altria Group quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Philip Morris International's net income of -$579M is lower than Altria Group's net income of $3B. Notably, Philip Morris International's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.53x while Altria Group's PE ratio is 8.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Philip Morris International is 6.40x versus 4.95x for Altria Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of -5.97% compared to Philip Morris International's net margin of 5.48%. Philip Morris International's return on equity of -- beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 50.31%.

Philip Morris International has a consensus price target of $149.79, signalling downside risk potential of -3.8%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $163.91 which suggests that it could grow by 8.58%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Philip Morris International, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Philip Morris International.

Philip Morris International has a beta of 0.527, which suggesting that the stock is 47.259% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.519, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.125%.

Philip Morris International has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.4%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 3.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. Philip Morris International pays 116.15% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Philip Morris International's is not.

Philip Morris International quarterly revenues are $9.7B, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $27.8B. Philip Morris International's net income of -$579M is lower than PepsiCo's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Philip Morris International's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.53x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 21.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Philip Morris International is 6.40x versus 2.27x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Walmart has a net margin of -5.97% compared to Philip Morris International's net margin of 2.91%. Philip Morris International's return on equity of -- beat Walmart's return on equity of 21.04%.

Philip Morris International has a consensus price target of $149.79, signalling downside risk potential of -3.8%. On the other hand Walmart has an analysts' consensus of $108.2908 which suggests that it could grow by 26.88%. Given that Walmart has higher upside potential than Philip Morris International, analysts believe Walmart is more attractive than Philip Morris International.

Philip Morris International has a beta of 0.527, which suggesting that the stock is 47.259% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Walmart has a beta of 0.534, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.583%.

Philip Morris International has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.4%. Walmart offers a yield of 0.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Philip Morris International pays 116.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Walmart pays out 34.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Walmart's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Philip Morris International's is not.

Philip Morris International quarterly revenues are $9.7B, which are smaller than Walmart quarterly revenues of $180.6B. Philip Morris International's net income of -$579M is lower than Walmart's net income of $5.3B. Notably, Philip Morris International's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.53x while Walmart's PE ratio is 35.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Philip Morris International is 6.40x versus 1.01x for Walmart. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.