BEEP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Team has a net margin of -13.44% compared to Mobile Infrastructure's net margin of -5.28%. Mobile Infrastructure's return on equity of -4.34% beat Team's return on equity of -152.04%.

Mobile Infrastructure has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Team has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 767.82%. Given that Team has higher upside potential than Mobile Infrastructure, analysts believe Team is more attractive than Mobile Infrastructure.

Mobile Infrastructure has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Team has a beta of 1.785, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.464%.

Mobile Infrastructure has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Team offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mobile Infrastructure pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Team pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mobile Infrastructure quarterly revenues are $9.8M, which are smaller than Team quarterly revenues of $210.8M. Mobile Infrastructure's net income of -$1.3M is higher than Team's net income of -$11.1M. Notably, Mobile Infrastructure's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Team's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mobile Infrastructure is 3.34x versus 0.08x for Team. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UL Solutions has a net margin of -13.44% compared to Mobile Infrastructure's net margin of 12.04%. Mobile Infrastructure's return on equity of -4.34% beat UL Solutions's return on equity of 35.73%.

Mobile Infrastructure has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand UL Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11.02%. Given that UL Solutions has higher upside potential than Mobile Infrastructure, analysts believe UL Solutions is more attractive than Mobile Infrastructure.

Mobile Infrastructure has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UL Solutions has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mobile Infrastructure has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. UL Solutions offers a yield of 0.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Mobile Infrastructure pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. UL Solutions pays out 261.54% of its earnings as a dividend.

Mobile Infrastructure quarterly revenues are $9.8M, which are smaller than UL Solutions quarterly revenues of $731M. Mobile Infrastructure's net income of -$1.3M is lower than UL Solutions's net income of $88M. Notably, Mobile Infrastructure's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while UL Solutions's PE ratio is 33.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mobile Infrastructure is 3.34x versus 3.61x for UL Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Verra Mobility has a net margin of -13.44% compared to Mobile Infrastructure's net margin of 15.4%. Mobile Infrastructure's return on equity of -4.34% beat Verra Mobility's return on equity of 22.99%.

Mobile Infrastructure has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Verra Mobility has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 22.86%. Given that Verra Mobility has higher upside potential than Mobile Infrastructure, analysts believe Verra Mobility is more attractive than Mobile Infrastructure.

Mobile Infrastructure has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verra Mobility has a beta of 1.229, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.947%.

Mobile Infrastructure has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Verra Mobility offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mobile Infrastructure pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Verra Mobility pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mobile Infrastructure quarterly revenues are $9.8M, which are smaller than Verra Mobility quarterly revenues of $225.6M. Mobile Infrastructure's net income of -$1.3M is lower than Verra Mobility's net income of $34.7M. Notably, Mobile Infrastructure's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Verra Mobility's PE ratio is 40.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mobile Infrastructure is 3.34x versus 4.60x for Verra Mobility. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xometry has a net margin of -13.44% compared to Mobile Infrastructure's net margin of -7.2%. Mobile Infrastructure's return on equity of -4.34% beat Xometry's return on equity of -15.74%.

Mobile Infrastructure has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xometry has an analysts' consensus of $33.70 which suggests that it could fall by -19.99%. Given that Xometry has higher upside potential than Mobile Infrastructure, analysts believe Xometry is more attractive than Mobile Infrastructure.

Mobile Infrastructure has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xometry has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mobile Infrastructure has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Xometry offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mobile Infrastructure pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xometry pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mobile Infrastructure quarterly revenues are $9.8M, which are smaller than Xometry quarterly revenues of $141.7M. Mobile Infrastructure's net income of -$1.3M is higher than Xometry's net income of -$10.2M. Notably, Mobile Infrastructure's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xometry's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mobile Infrastructure is 3.34x versus 3.91x for Xometry. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.