LZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

JNS Holdings has a net margin of 6.56% compared to LegalZoom.com's net margin of --. LegalZoom.com's return on equity of 20.24% beat JNS Holdings's return on equity of --.

LegalZoom.com has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 5.17%. On the other hand JNS Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that LegalZoom.com has higher upside potential than JNS Holdings, analysts believe LegalZoom.com is more attractive than JNS Holdings.

LegalZoom.com has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JNS Holdings has a beta of 0.365, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.492%.

LegalZoom.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. JNS Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LegalZoom.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JNS Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LegalZoom.com quarterly revenues are $168.6M, which are larger than JNS Holdings quarterly revenues of --. LegalZoom.com's net income of $11.1M is higher than JNS Holdings's net income of --. Notably, LegalZoom.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 59.77x while JNS Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LegalZoom.com is 2.14x versus -- for JNS Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Verra Mobility has a net margin of 6.56% compared to LegalZoom.com's net margin of 15.4%. LegalZoom.com's return on equity of 20.24% beat Verra Mobility's return on equity of 22.99%.

LegalZoom.com has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 5.17%. On the other hand Verra Mobility has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 22.86%. Given that Verra Mobility has higher upside potential than LegalZoom.com, analysts believe Verra Mobility is more attractive than LegalZoom.com.

LegalZoom.com has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verra Mobility has a beta of 1.229, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.947%.

LegalZoom.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Verra Mobility offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LegalZoom.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Verra Mobility pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LegalZoom.com quarterly revenues are $168.6M, which are smaller than Verra Mobility quarterly revenues of $225.6M. LegalZoom.com's net income of $11.1M is lower than Verra Mobility's net income of $34.7M. Notably, LegalZoom.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 59.77x while Verra Mobility's PE ratio is 40.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LegalZoom.com is 2.14x versus 4.60x for Verra Mobility. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Woodbridge Liquidation Trust has a net margin of 6.56% compared to LegalZoom.com's net margin of --. LegalZoom.com's return on equity of 20.24% beat Woodbridge Liquidation Trust's return on equity of --.

LegalZoom.com has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 5.17%. On the other hand Woodbridge Liquidation Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that LegalZoom.com has higher upside potential than Woodbridge Liquidation Trust, analysts believe LegalZoom.com is more attractive than Woodbridge Liquidation Trust.

LegalZoom.com has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Woodbridge Liquidation Trust has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

LegalZoom.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Woodbridge Liquidation Trust offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.18 per share. LegalZoom.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodbridge Liquidation Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LegalZoom.com quarterly revenues are $168.6M, which are larger than Woodbridge Liquidation Trust quarterly revenues of --. LegalZoom.com's net income of $11.1M is higher than Woodbridge Liquidation Trust's net income of --. Notably, LegalZoom.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 59.77x while Woodbridge Liquidation Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LegalZoom.com is 2.14x versus -- for Woodbridge Liquidation Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xometry has a net margin of 6.56% compared to LegalZoom.com's net margin of -7.2%. LegalZoom.com's return on equity of 20.24% beat Xometry's return on equity of -15.74%.

LegalZoom.com has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 5.17%. On the other hand Xometry has an analysts' consensus of $33.70 which suggests that it could fall by -19.99%. Given that LegalZoom.com has higher upside potential than Xometry, analysts believe LegalZoom.com is more attractive than Xometry.

LegalZoom.com has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xometry has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

LegalZoom.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Xometry offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LegalZoom.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xometry pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LegalZoom.com quarterly revenues are $168.6M, which are larger than Xometry quarterly revenues of $141.7M. LegalZoom.com's net income of $11.1M is higher than Xometry's net income of -$10.2M. Notably, LegalZoom.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 59.77x while Xometry's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LegalZoom.com is 2.14x versus 3.91x for Xometry. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.