VRRM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AtlasClear Holdings has a net margin of -30.09% compared to Verra Mobility's net margin of -15.28%. Verra Mobility's return on equity of 7.63% beat AtlasClear Holdings's return on equity of --.

Verra Mobility has a consensus price target of $29.08, signalling upside risk potential of 32.86%. On the other hand AtlasClear Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 190376.15%. Given that AtlasClear Holdings has higher upside potential than Verra Mobility, analysts believe AtlasClear Holdings is more attractive than Verra Mobility.

Verra Mobility has a beta of 0.908, which suggesting that the stock is 9.226% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AtlasClear Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Verra Mobility has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AtlasClear Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Verra Mobility pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AtlasClear Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Verra Mobility quarterly revenues are $221.5M, which are larger than AtlasClear Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.7M. Verra Mobility's net income of -$66.7M is lower than AtlasClear Holdings's net income of -$419.7K. Notably, Verra Mobility's price-to-earnings ratio is 128.76x while AtlasClear Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Verra Mobility is 4.18x versus 0.01x for AtlasClear Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Aurora Innovation has a net margin of -30.09% compared to Verra Mobility's net margin of --. Verra Mobility's return on equity of 7.63% beat Aurora Innovation's return on equity of --.

Verra Mobility has a consensus price target of $29.08, signalling upside risk potential of 32.86%. On the other hand Aurora Innovation has an analysts' consensus of $8.95 which suggests that it could grow by 45.6%. Given that Aurora Innovation has higher upside potential than Verra Mobility, analysts believe Aurora Innovation is more attractive than Verra Mobility.

Verra Mobility has a beta of 0.908, which suggesting that the stock is 9.226% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aurora Innovation has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Verra Mobility has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Aurora Innovation offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Verra Mobility pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aurora Innovation pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Verra Mobility quarterly revenues are $221.5M, which are larger than Aurora Innovation quarterly revenues of --. Verra Mobility's net income of -$66.7M is higher than Aurora Innovation's net income of -$193M. Notably, Verra Mobility's price-to-earnings ratio is 128.76x while Aurora Innovation's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Verra Mobility is 4.18x versus 146.38x for Aurora Innovation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cantaloupe has a net margin of -30.09% compared to Verra Mobility's net margin of 6.75%. Verra Mobility's return on equity of 7.63% beat Cantaloupe's return on equity of 8.34%.

Verra Mobility has a consensus price target of $29.08, signalling upside risk potential of 32.86%. On the other hand Cantaloupe has an analysts' consensus of $12.50 which suggests that it could grow by 64.47%. Given that Cantaloupe has higher upside potential than Verra Mobility, analysts believe Cantaloupe is more attractive than Verra Mobility.

Verra Mobility has a beta of 0.908, which suggesting that the stock is 9.226% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cantaloupe has a beta of 1.455, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.507%.

Verra Mobility has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cantaloupe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Verra Mobility pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cantaloupe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Verra Mobility quarterly revenues are $221.5M, which are larger than Cantaloupe quarterly revenues of $73.7M. Verra Mobility's net income of -$66.7M is lower than Cantaloupe's net income of $5M. Notably, Verra Mobility's price-to-earnings ratio is 128.76x while Cantaloupe's PE ratio is 38.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Verra Mobility is 4.18x versus 1.98x for Cantaloupe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Veea has a net margin of -30.09% compared to Verra Mobility's net margin of -65748.98%. Verra Mobility's return on equity of 7.63% beat Veea's return on equity of --.

Verra Mobility has a consensus price target of $29.08, signalling upside risk potential of 32.86%. On the other hand Veea has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Verra Mobility has higher upside potential than Veea, analysts believe Verra Mobility is more attractive than Veea.

Verra Mobility has a beta of 0.908, which suggesting that the stock is 9.226% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Veea has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Verra Mobility has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Veea offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Verra Mobility pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Veea pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Verra Mobility quarterly revenues are $221.5M, which are larger than Veea quarterly revenues of $50.7K. Verra Mobility's net income of -$66.7M is lower than Veea's net income of -$33.3M. Notably, Verra Mobility's price-to-earnings ratio is 128.76x while Veea's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Verra Mobility is 4.18x versus 341.38x for Veea. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.