VRRM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

LegalZoom.com has a net margin of 15.4% compared to Verra Mobility's net margin of 6.56%. Verra Mobility's return on equity of 22.99% beat LegalZoom.com's return on equity of 20.24%.

Verra Mobility has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.86%. On the other hand LegalZoom.com has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5.17%. Given that Verra Mobility has higher upside potential than LegalZoom.com, analysts believe Verra Mobility is more attractive than LegalZoom.com.

Verra Mobility has a beta of 1.229, which suggesting that the stock is 22.947% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LegalZoom.com has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Verra Mobility has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LegalZoom.com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Verra Mobility pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LegalZoom.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Verra Mobility quarterly revenues are $225.6M, which are larger than LegalZoom.com quarterly revenues of $168.6M. Verra Mobility's net income of $34.7M is higher than LegalZoom.com's net income of $11.1M. Notably, Verra Mobility's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.24x while LegalZoom.com's PE ratio is 59.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Verra Mobility is 4.60x versus 2.14x for LegalZoom.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Team has a net margin of 15.4% compared to Verra Mobility's net margin of -5.28%. Verra Mobility's return on equity of 22.99% beat Team's return on equity of -152.04%.

Verra Mobility has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.86%. On the other hand Team has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 767.82%. Given that Team has higher upside potential than Verra Mobility, analysts believe Team is more attractive than Verra Mobility.

Verra Mobility has a beta of 1.229, which suggesting that the stock is 22.947% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Team has a beta of 1.785, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.464%.

Verra Mobility has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Team offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Verra Mobility pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Team pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Verra Mobility quarterly revenues are $225.6M, which are larger than Team quarterly revenues of $210.8M. Verra Mobility's net income of $34.7M is higher than Team's net income of -$11.1M. Notably, Verra Mobility's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.24x while Team's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Verra Mobility is 4.60x versus 0.08x for Team. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UL Solutions has a net margin of 15.4% compared to Verra Mobility's net margin of 12.04%. Verra Mobility's return on equity of 22.99% beat UL Solutions's return on equity of 35.73%.

Verra Mobility has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.86%. On the other hand UL Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11.02%. Given that Verra Mobility has higher upside potential than UL Solutions, analysts believe Verra Mobility is more attractive than UL Solutions.

Verra Mobility has a beta of 1.229, which suggesting that the stock is 22.947% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UL Solutions has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Verra Mobility has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. UL Solutions offers a yield of 0.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Verra Mobility pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. UL Solutions pays out 261.54% of its earnings as a dividend.

Verra Mobility quarterly revenues are $225.6M, which are smaller than UL Solutions quarterly revenues of $731M. Verra Mobility's net income of $34.7M is lower than UL Solutions's net income of $88M. Notably, Verra Mobility's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.24x while UL Solutions's PE ratio is 33.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Verra Mobility is 4.60x versus 3.61x for UL Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xometry has a net margin of 15.4% compared to Verra Mobility's net margin of -7.2%. Verra Mobility's return on equity of 22.99% beat Xometry's return on equity of -15.74%.

Verra Mobility has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.86%. On the other hand Xometry has an analysts' consensus of $33.70 which suggests that it could fall by -19.99%. Given that Verra Mobility has higher upside potential than Xometry, analysts believe Verra Mobility is more attractive than Xometry.

Verra Mobility has a beta of 1.229, which suggesting that the stock is 22.947% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xometry has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Verra Mobility has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Xometry offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Verra Mobility pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xometry pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Verra Mobility quarterly revenues are $225.6M, which are larger than Xometry quarterly revenues of $141.7M. Verra Mobility's net income of $34.7M is higher than Xometry's net income of -$10.2M. Notably, Verra Mobility's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.24x while Xometry's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Verra Mobility is 4.60x versus 3.91x for Xometry. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.