WING Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Domino's Pizza has a net margin of 16.53% compared to Wingstop's net margin of 11.74%. Wingstop's return on equity of -- beat Domino's Pizza's return on equity of --.

Wingstop has a consensus price target of $309.91, signalling upside risk potential of 33.38%. On the other hand Domino's Pizza has an analysts' consensus of $487.24 which suggests that it could grow by 9.69%. Given that Wingstop has higher upside potential than Domino's Pizza, analysts believe Wingstop is more attractive than Domino's Pizza.

Wingstop has a beta of 2.017, which suggesting that the stock is 101.691% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Domino's Pizza has a beta of 1.146, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.577%.

Wingstop has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.44%. Domino's Pizza offers a yield of 1.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.74 per share. Wingstop pays 26.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Domino's Pizza pays out 35.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wingstop quarterly revenues are $161.8M, which are smaller than Domino's Pizza quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Wingstop's net income of $26.8M is lower than Domino's Pizza's net income of $169.4M. Notably, Wingstop's price-to-earnings ratio is 62.63x while Domino's Pizza's PE ratio is 26.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wingstop is 10.91x versus 3.30x for Domino's Pizza. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Darden Restaurants has a net margin of 16.53% compared to Wingstop's net margin of 10.24%. Wingstop's return on equity of -- beat Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.6%.

Wingstop has a consensus price target of $309.91, signalling upside risk potential of 33.38%. On the other hand Darden Restaurants has an analysts' consensus of $208.25 which suggests that it could grow by 8.25%. Given that Wingstop has higher upside potential than Darden Restaurants, analysts believe Wingstop is more attractive than Darden Restaurants.

Wingstop has a beta of 2.017, which suggesting that the stock is 101.691% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Darden Restaurants has a beta of 0.936, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.442%.

Wingstop has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.44%. Darden Restaurants offers a yield of 2.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share. Wingstop pays 26.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Darden Restaurants pays out 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wingstop quarterly revenues are $161.8M, which are smaller than Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Wingstop's net income of $26.8M is lower than Darden Restaurants's net income of $323.4M. Notably, Wingstop's price-to-earnings ratio is 62.63x while Darden Restaurants's PE ratio is 21.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wingstop is 10.91x versus 1.95x for Darden Restaurants. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brinker International has a net margin of 16.53% compared to Wingstop's net margin of 8.73%. Wingstop's return on equity of -- beat Brinker International's return on equity of 4799.27%.

Wingstop has a consensus price target of $309.91, signalling upside risk potential of 33.38%. On the other hand Brinker International has an analysts' consensus of $183.06 which suggests that it could grow by 35.53%. Given that Brinker International has higher upside potential than Wingstop, analysts believe Brinker International is more attractive than Wingstop.

Wingstop has a beta of 2.017, which suggesting that the stock is 101.691% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brinker International has a beta of 2.206, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.618%.

Wingstop has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.44%. Brinker International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Wingstop pays 26.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wingstop quarterly revenues are $161.8M, which are smaller than Brinker International quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Wingstop's net income of $26.8M is lower than Brinker International's net income of $118.5M. Notably, Wingstop's price-to-earnings ratio is 62.63x while Brinker International's PE ratio is 23.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wingstop is 10.91x versus 1.29x for Brinker International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Texas Roadhouse has a net margin of 16.53% compared to Wingstop's net margin of 8.06%. Wingstop's return on equity of -- beat Texas Roadhouse's return on equity of 34.11%.

Wingstop has a consensus price target of $309.91, signalling upside risk potential of 33.38%. On the other hand Texas Roadhouse has an analysts' consensus of $191.57 which suggests that it could grow by 19.84%. Given that Wingstop has higher upside potential than Texas Roadhouse, analysts believe Wingstop is more attractive than Texas Roadhouse.

Wingstop has a beta of 2.017, which suggesting that the stock is 101.691% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 0.878, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.222%.

Wingstop has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.44%. Texas Roadhouse offers a yield of 1.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Wingstop pays 26.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Roadhouse pays out 37.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wingstop quarterly revenues are $161.8M, which are smaller than Texas Roadhouse quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Wingstop's net income of $26.8M is lower than Texas Roadhouse's net income of $115.8M. Notably, Wingstop's price-to-earnings ratio is 62.63x while Texas Roadhouse's PE ratio is 24.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wingstop is 10.91x versus 1.99x for Texas Roadhouse. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.