DRI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cracker Barrel Old Country Store has a net margin of 10.24% compared to Darden Restaurants's net margin of 2.34%. Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.6% beat Cracker Barrel Old Country Store's return on equity of 8.07%.

Darden Restaurants has a consensus price target of $206.72, signalling upside risk potential of 1.32%. On the other hand Cracker Barrel Old Country Store has an analysts' consensus of $47.57 which suggests that it could fall by -16.09%. Given that Darden Restaurants has higher upside potential than Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, analysts believe Darden Restaurants is more attractive than Cracker Barrel Old Country Store.

Darden Restaurants has a beta of 0.742, which suggesting that the stock is 25.833% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cracker Barrel Old Country Store has a beta of 1.361, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.07%.

Darden Restaurants has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Darden Restaurants pays 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store pays out 283.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Darden Restaurants's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Cracker Barrel Old Country Store's is not.

Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Cracker Barrel Old Country Store quarterly revenues of $949.4M. Darden Restaurants's net income of $323.4M is higher than Cracker Barrel Old Country Store's net income of $22.2M. Notably, Darden Restaurants's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.00x while Cracker Barrel Old Country Store's PE ratio is 35.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Darden Restaurants is 2.06x versus 0.36x for Cracker Barrel Old Country Store. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brinker International has a net margin of 10.24% compared to Darden Restaurants's net margin of 8.36%. Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.6% beat Brinker International's return on equity of 421.07%.

Darden Restaurants has a consensus price target of $206.72, signalling upside risk potential of 1.32%. On the other hand Brinker International has an analysts' consensus of $164.27 which suggests that it could grow by 6.3%. Given that Brinker International has higher upside potential than Darden Restaurants, analysts believe Brinker International is more attractive than Darden Restaurants.

Darden Restaurants has a beta of 0.742, which suggesting that the stock is 25.833% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brinker International has a beta of 1.656, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.618%.

Darden Restaurants has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. Brinker International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Darden Restaurants pays 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Brinker International quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Darden Restaurants's net income of $323.4M is higher than Brinker International's net income of $119.1M. Notably, Darden Restaurants's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.00x while Brinker International's PE ratio is 21.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Darden Restaurants is 2.06x versus 1.39x for Brinker International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kura Sushi USA has a net margin of 10.24% compared to Darden Restaurants's net margin of -5.83%. Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.6% beat Kura Sushi USA's return on equity of -5.55%.

Darden Restaurants has a consensus price target of $206.72, signalling upside risk potential of 1.32%. On the other hand Kura Sushi USA has an analysts' consensus of $64.44 which suggests that it could grow by 2.33%. Given that Kura Sushi USA has higher upside potential than Darden Restaurants, analysts believe Kura Sushi USA is more attractive than Darden Restaurants.

Darden Restaurants has a beta of 0.742, which suggesting that the stock is 25.833% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kura Sushi USA has a beta of 1.551, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.076%.

Darden Restaurants has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. Kura Sushi USA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Darden Restaurants pays 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Kura Sushi USA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Darden Restaurants's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Kura Sushi USA quarterly revenues of $64.9M. Darden Restaurants's net income of $323.4M is higher than Kura Sushi USA's net income of -$3.8M. Notably, Darden Restaurants's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.00x while Kura Sushi USA's PE ratio is 732.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Darden Restaurants is 2.06x versus 2.80x for Kura Sushi USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yum Brands has a net margin of 10.24% compared to Darden Restaurants's net margin of 14.16%. Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.6% beat Yum Brands's return on equity of --.

Darden Restaurants has a consensus price target of $206.72, signalling upside risk potential of 1.32%. On the other hand Yum Brands has an analysts' consensus of $158.39 which suggests that it could grow by 8.81%. Given that Yum Brands has higher upside potential than Darden Restaurants, analysts believe Yum Brands is more attractive than Darden Restaurants.

Darden Restaurants has a beta of 0.742, which suggesting that the stock is 25.833% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yum Brands has a beta of 0.774, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.641%.

Darden Restaurants has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. Yum Brands offers a yield of 1.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Darden Restaurants pays 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Yum Brands pays out 50.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Yum Brands quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Darden Restaurants's net income of $323.4M is higher than Yum Brands's net income of $253M. Notably, Darden Restaurants's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.00x while Yum Brands's PE ratio is 28.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Darden Restaurants is 2.06x versus 5.35x for Yum Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.